Comparison of radiographic and electronic working lengths.

The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of radiographic and electronic methods to determine reliably the location of the apical constriction. The working length of root canals in human cadaver teeth was determined by positioning an endodontic file at the apical termination point as indicated by an apex locator. These same teeth were radiographed at various angles with the file in place. The radiographs were evaluated by five examiners to determine a radiographic termination point for each canal. Teeth were extracted and examined histologically to determine the ideal termination point. The deviations of the two experimental termination points from the ideal termination point were compared. The mean of the absolute value of the deviations from the apical constriction for the apex locator was significantly less (p < 0.05) than that for the radiographic method. Thus, the method using the apex locator was slightly more reliable.

[1]  I. Sunada New Method for Measuring the Length of the Root Canal , 1962 .

[2]  L. Berman,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of the Neosono-D electronic apex locator. , 1984, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  D GREEN,et al.  Stereomicroscopic study of 700 root apices of maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth. , 1960, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[4]  J F Corcoran,et al.  Influence of the major and minor foramen diameters on apical electronic probe measurements. , 1990, Journal of endodontics.

[5]  B H Seidberg,et al.  Clinical investigation of measuring working lengths of root canals with an electronic device and with digital-tactile sense. , 1975, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[6]  A Tamse,et al.  Zygomatic arch interference with correct radiographic diagnosis in maxillary molar endodontics. , 1980, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[7]  C M Bramante,et al.  A critical evaluation of some methods of determining tooth length. , 1974, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[8]  L. Huang,et al.  An experimental study of the principle of electronic root canal measurement. , 1987, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  R. Olson,et al.  Clinical evaluation of five electronic root canal length measuring instruments. , 1990, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  Y. Kuttler,et al.  Microscopic investigation of root apexes. , 1955, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[11]  N Inoue,et al.  An audiometric method for determining the length of root canals. , 1973, Journal of the Canadian Dental Association.

[12]  J. Ushiyama,et al.  New principle and method for measuring the root canal length. , 1983, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  G B Pelleu,et al.  Reliability of electronic measuring devices in endodontic therapy. , 1975, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  E J Hovland,et al.  An evaluation of the Apex Locator Endocater. , 1990, Journal of endodontics.

[15]  M Ohashi,et al.  A new method and apparatus for measuring root canal length. , 1986, The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry.

[16]  L J O'Neill A clinical evaluation of electronic root canal measurement. , 1974, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.