Using guitar learning to probe the Action Observation Network's response to visuomotor familiarity

&NA; Watching other people move elicits engagement of a collection of sensorimotor brain regions collectively termed the Action Observation Network (AON). An extensive literature documents more robust AON responses when observing or executing familiar compared to unfamiliar actions, as well as a positive correlation between amplitude of AON response and an observer's familiarity with an observed or executed movement. On the other hand, emerging evidence shows patterns of AON activity counter to these findings, whereby in some circumstances, unfamiliar actions lead to greater AON engagement than familiar actions. In an attempt to reconcile these conflicting findings, some have proposed that the relationship between AON response amplitude and action familiarity is nonlinear in nature. In the present study, we used an elaborate guitar training intervention to probe the relationship between movement familiarity and AON engagement during action execution and action observation tasks. Participants underwent fMRI scanning while executing one set of guitar sequences with a scanner‐compatible bass guitar and observing a second set of sequences. Participants then acquired further physical practice or observational experience with half of these stimuli outside the scanner across 3 days. Participants then returned for an identical scanning session, wherein they executed and observed equal numbers of familiar (trained) and unfamiliar (untrained) guitar sequences. Via region of interest analyses, we extracted activity within AON regions engaged during both scanning sessions, and then fit linear, quadratic and cubic regression models to these data. The data best support the cubic regression models, suggesting that the response profile within key sensorimotor brain regions associated with the AON respond to action familiarity in a nonlinear manner. Moreover, by probing the subjective nature of the prediction error signal, we show results consistent with a predictive coding account of AON engagement during action observation and execution that also takes into account effects of changes in neural efficiency. HighlightsThe impact of familiarity on AON engagement is debated to be linear vs. nonlinear.We fit regression models to AON ROIs for guitar riff observation and execution.A cubic model best captured AON responses to familiarity for both conditions.Participants' subjective ratings of familiarity reflected a similar cubic function.Findings support a predictive coding + neural efficiency account of familiarity and AON engagement.

[1]  Farsin Hamzei,et al.  Daily iTBS worsens hand motor training — A combined TMS, fMRI and mirror training study , 2015, NeuroImage.

[2]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Imitation and observational learning of hand actions: Prefrontal involvement and connectivity , 2012, NeuroImage.

[3]  James M. Kilner,et al.  More than one pathway to action understanding , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  S. Zeki,et al.  Neural correlates of beauty. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  A F Bobick,et al.  Movement, activity and action: the role of knowledge in the perception of motion. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  C. Urgesi,et al.  Simulating the future of actions in the human corticospinal system. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  M. Giese,et al.  Nonvisual Motor Training Influences Biological Motion Perception , 2006, Current Biology.

[8]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The mirror-neuron system: a Bayesian perspective. , 2007, Neuroreport.

[10]  S. Liew,et al.  Both novelty and expertise increase action observation network activity , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[11]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Dance experience sculpts aesthetic perception and related brain circuits , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[13]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Keysers,et al.  The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[16]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.

[17]  大友 邦,et al.  217 Statistical Parametric Mapping 5による脳容積測定の装置依存性(MR検査 脳-計測,第36回日本放射線技術学会秋季学術大会) , 2008 .

[18]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Goal Representation in Human Anterior Intraparietal Sulcus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  Response of face-selective brain regions to trustworthiness and gender of faces , 2012, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Prefrontal involvement in imitation learning of hand actions: Effects of practice and expertise , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  S. Gotts Incremental learning of perceptual and conceptual representations and the puzzle of neural repetition suppression , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[22]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[23]  R. Schubotz Prediction of external events with our motor system: towards a new framework , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  J. Kilner,et al.  The time course of eye movements during action observation reflects sequence learning , 2013, Neuroreport.

[25]  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore,et al.  The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  The Human Motor System Supports Sequence-Specific Representations over Multiple Training-Dependent Timescales. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  “Neural efficiency” of experts’ brain during judgment of actions: A high-resolution EEG study in elite and amateur karate athletes , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Body language in the brain: constructing meaning from expressive movement , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  Scott T. Grafton Embodied Cognition and the Simulation of Action to Understand Others , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[30]  C. Sinigaglia What type of action understanding is subserved by mirror neurons? , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[32]  M. Costa,et al.  Types of nerves in the enteric nervous system , 1980, Neuroscience.

[33]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Underlying Imitation Learning of Hand Actions An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2004, Neuron.

[34]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Action Prediction in Younger versus Older Adults: Neural Correlates of Motor Familiarity , 2013, PloS one.

[35]  D. Perrett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.8 No.11 November 2004 Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective , 2022 .

[36]  Jörn Diedrichsen,et al.  Skill learning strengthens cortical representations of motor sequences , 2013, eLife.

[37]  G. Csibra Mirror neurons and action observation. Is simulation involved , 2005 .

[38]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  CHAPTER 2 – Statistical parametric mapping , 2007 .

[39]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Brain regions with mirror properties: A meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[41]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Movement-Specific Repetition Suppression in Ventral and Dorsal Premotor Cortex during Action Observation , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Comparing the neural distance effect derived from the non–symbolic comparison and the same–different task , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[43]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Additive Routes to Action Learning: Layering Experience Shapes Engagement of the Action Observation Network , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[44]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[45]  A. Goldman,et al.  Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[47]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Mapping the flow of information within the putative mirror neuron system during gesture observation , 2011, NeuroImage.

[48]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Dynamic Modulation of the Action Observation Network by Movement Familiarity , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Claus Lamm,et al.  The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-taking and Cognitive Appraisal , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Martin Lotze,et al.  Kinesthetic imagery of musical performance , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[51]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited , 2007, NeuroImage.

[52]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  I Know What You Are Doing A Neurophysiological Study , 2001, Neuron.

[53]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[54]  A. V. van Duijvenvoorde,et al.  Longitudinal Changes in Adolescent Risk-Taking: A Comprehensive Study of Neural Responses to Rewards, Pubertal Development, and Risk-Taking Behavior , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Expanding the mirror: vicarious activity for actions, emotions, and sensations , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[56]  Antonia F. de C. Hamilton,et al.  The mirror neuron system contributes to social responding , 2013, Cortex.

[57]  A. Kelly,et al.  Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Robotic movement preferentially engages the action observation network , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[59]  K. Doya,et al.  A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[60]  R. Shadmehr,et al.  Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. , 1997, Science.

[61]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  The Impact of Aesthetic Evaluation and Physical Ability on Dance Perception , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[62]  Sotaro Shimada,et al.  Deactivation in the sensorimotor area during observation of a human agent performing robotic actions , 2010, Brain and Cognition.