Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. I. Measurements and mechanisms.

Sound transmission through ears with tympanic-membrane (TM) perforations is not well understood. Here, measurements on human-cadaver ears are reported that describe sound transmission through the middle ear with experimentally produced perforations, which range from 0.5 to 5.0 mm in diameter. Three response variables were measured with acoustic stimulation at the TM: stapes velocity, middle-ear cavity sound pressure, and acoustic impedance at the TM. The stapes-velocity measurements show that perforations cause frequency-dependent losses; at low frequencies losses are largest and increase as perforation size increases. Measurements of middle-ear cavity pressure coupled with the stapes-velocity measurements indicate that the dominant mechanism for loss with TM perforations is reduction in pressure difference across the TM; changes in TM-to-ossicular coupling generally contribute less than 5 dB to the loss. Measurements of middle-ear input impedance indicate that for low frequencies, the input impedance with a perforation approximates the impedance of the middle-ear cavity; as the perforation size increases, the similarity to the cavity's impedance extends to higher frequencies. The collection of results suggests that the effects of perforations can be represented by the path for air-volume flow from the ear canal to the middle-ear cavity. The quantitative description of perforation-induced losses may help clinicians determine, in an ear with a perforation, whether poor hearing results only from the perforation or whether other pathology should be expected.

[1]  A. Møller,et al.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE OF THE MIDDLE EAR AND ITS TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES. , 1965, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  J J Rosowski,et al.  Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the Mongolian gerbil Meriones unguiculatus. I: Middle-ear input impedance. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  C. W. Harrison,et al.  Tympanic membrane perforation. Effect on audiogram. , 1972, Archives of otolaryngology.

[4]  M. Kringlebotn,et al.  The size of the middle ear and the mastoid air cell. , 1978, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[5]  R. Goode,et al.  Effect of Changes in Mass on Middle Ear Function , 1993, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[6]  J J Rosowski,et al.  Measurements of the acoustic input impedance of cat ears: 10 Hz to 20 kHz. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Saunders,et al.  The Effect of Tympanic Membrane Perforation Size on Umbo Velocity in the Rat , 1996, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  Sahar Ahmad,et al.  Hearing loss in perforations of the tympanic membrane , 1979, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[9]  D. Lim,et al.  Human tympanic membrane. An ultrastructural observation. , 1970, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[10]  John J. Rosowski,et al.  Acoustic responses of the human middle ear , 2000, Hearing Research.

[11]  W M Rabinowitz,et al.  Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  David P. Egolf Mathematical modeling of a probe-tube microphone , 1977 .

[13]  S. Hamburger,et al.  The prevalence of tympanostomy tubes in children in the United States, 1988. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[14]  S. E. Voss,et al.  Middle Ear Pathology Can Affect the Ear‐Canal Sound Pressure Generated by Audiologic Earphones , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[15]  J J Rosowski,et al.  Middle-ear function with tympanic-membrane perforations. II. A simple model. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  W. Peake,et al.  The middle ear of a lion: comparison of structure and function to domestic cat. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  W. T. Peake,et al.  Is the pressure difference between the oval and round windows the effective acoustic stimulus for the cochlea? , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  D. Austin Sound conduction of the diseased ear , 1978, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[19]  M. C. Payne,et al.  Effects of perforations of the tympanic membrane on cochlear potentials. , 1951, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[20]  R. Ruben,et al.  Hearing results with the use of different tympanostomy tubes: a prospective study. , 1988, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[21]  J J Rosowski,et al.  Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.