Visual Assessment of Alleged Plagiarism Cases

We developed a visual analysis tool to support the verification, assessment, and presentation of alleged cases of plagiarism. The analysis of a suspicious document typically results in a compilation of categorized “finding spots”. The categorization reveals the way in which the suspicious text fragment was created from the source, e.g. by obfuscation, translation, or by shake and paste. We provide a three‐level approach for exploring the finding spots in context. The overview shows the relationship of the entire suspicious document to the set of source documents. A glyph‐based view reveals the structural and textual differences and similarities of a set of finding spots and their corresponding source text fragments. For further analysis and editing of the finding spot's assessment, the actual text fragments can be embedded side‐by‐side in the diffline view. The different views are tied together by versatile navigation and selection operations. Our expert reviewers confirm that our tool provides a significant improvement over existing static visualizations for assessing plagiarism cases.

[1]  Andreas Nürnberger,et al.  Demonstration of citation pattern analysis for plagiarism detection , 2013, SIGIR.

[2]  Benno Stein,et al.  WORDGRAPH: Keyword-in-Context Visualization for NETSPEAK's Wildcard Search , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Visualizing Activity on Wikipedia with Chromograms , 2007, INTERACT.

[4]  Debora Weber-Wulff,et al.  False Feathers: A Perspective on Academic Plagiarism , 2014 .

[5]  Marco Büchler,et al.  Visualizations for Text Re-use , 2015, 2014 International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications (IVAPP).

[6]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Using text animated transitions to support navigation in document histories , 2010, CHI.

[7]  Norman Meuschke,et al.  State-of-the-art in detecting academic plagiarism , 2013 .

[8]  Aniket Kittur,et al.  Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard , 2008, CHI.

[9]  Thomas Ertl,et al.  VarifocalReader — In-Depth Visual Analysis of Large Text Documents , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[10]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations , 2004, CHI.

[11]  J. Evan Noynaert,et al.  Plagiarism Detection Software , 2005 .

[12]  Matthias Hagen,et al.  Overview of the 1st international competition on plagiarism detection , 2009 .

[13]  Marlin Thomas,et al.  Plagiarism Detection Software , 2008 .