Barriers to Participation in Polarized Online Discussions About Covid-19 and the Russo-Ukrainian War

Even though social networking sites create a unique online public space for the exchange of opinions, only a small share of citizens participate in online discussions. Moreover, research has depicted current online discussions as highly uncivil, hostile, and polarized, and the number of heated discussions has escalated in the last two years because of health, social, and security crises. This study investigates the perceived barriers to participation in Facebook discussions, focusing on two topics: the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russo-Ukrainian War. It explores the role that the negativity of these online discussions has on participation. To investigate the perspectives of users and their personal experiences with online discussions in times of crisis, we apply a qualitative research method and interviews with participants. We collected and analyzed 50 semi-structured interviews with Czech Facebook users who participated in discussions during the spring of 2021 (i.e., Covid-19) and the spring of 2022 (i.e., Russo-Ukrainian War). The results show that, after initial mobilization at the beginning of the pandemic, the crisis reinforced several crucial barriers to participation in discussions due to the perceived persistence of polarization (e.g., the spread of disinformation, the bipolar character of discussions, negative perception of opponents), which subsequently spread to other areas and issues. The data also implies that these barriers tend to demobilize less active participants, those who do not have strong opinions, and participants who think the subject matter is not worth the heated exchange of opinions.

[1]  J. Habermas.  Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere , 2022, Theory, Culture & Society.

[2]  Gareth Tyson,et al.  A Reddit Dataset for the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict in 2022 , 2022, ArXiv.

[3]  Ian Hawkins,et al.  The Language of Extremism on Social Media: An Examination of Posts, Comments, and Themes on Reddit , 2022, Frontiers in Political Science.

[4]  Marike Bormann.  Perceptions and Evaluations of Incivility in Public Online Discussions—Insights From Focus Groups With Different Online Actors , 2022, Frontiers in Political Science.

[5]  E. Malova.  Understanding online conversations about COVID-19 vaccine on Twitter: vaccine hesitancy amid the public health crisis , 2021, Communication Research Reports.

[6]  Nahema Marchal.  “Be Nice or Leave Me Alone”: An Intergroup Perspective on Affective Polarization in Online Political Discussions , 2021, Communication Research.

[7]  B. Nyhan,et al.  The Distorting Prism of Social Media: How Self-Selection and Exposure to Incivility Fuel Online Comment Toxicity , 2021, Journal of Communication.

[8]  C. D. Vreese,et al.  Does a Crisis Change News Habits? A Comparative Study of the Effects of COVID-19 on News Media Use in 17 European Countries , 2021, Digital Journalism.

[9]  Tim Groot Kormelink,et al.  From “Far Away” to “Shock” to “Fatigue” to “Back to Normal”: How Young People Experienced News During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic , 2021, Journalism Studies.

[10]  V. Štětka,et al.  Audience Engagement with COVID-19 News: The Impact of Lockdown and Live Coverage, and the Role of Polarization , 2021, Journalism Studies.

[11]  Hsuan-Ting Chen,et al.  Cross-cutting and Like-minded Discussion on Social Media: The Moderating Role of Issue Importance in the (De)mobilizing Effect of Political Discussion on Political Participation , 2021 .

[12]  Lenka Buštíková,et al.  Best in Covid: Populists in the Time of Pandemic , 2020, Politics and Governance.

[13]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse Online: An Examination of Types and Predictors , 2020 .

[14]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Political polarization drives online conversations about COVID‐19 in the United States , 2020, Human behavior and emerging technologies.

[15]  Patrícia Rossini,et al.  Beyond Incivility: Understanding Patterns of Uncivil and Intolerant Discourse in Online Political Talk , 2020, Communication Research.

[16]  D. Lazer,et al.  Demographics and (Equal?) Voice: Assessing Participation in Online Deliberative Sessions , 2020, Political Studies.

[17]  Peter Van Aelst,et al.  Resilience to Online Disinformation: A Framework for Cross-National Comparative Research , 2020 .

[18]  Jae Kook Lee,et al.  Determinants of cross-cutting discussion on Facebook: Political interest, news consumption, and strong-tie heterogeneity , 2020, New Media Soc..

[19]  Jakob Ohme.  Updating citizenship? The effects of digital media use on citizenship understanding and political participation , 2019 .

[20]  V. Štětka,et al.  The vaccination debate in the "post-truth" era: social media as sites of multi-layered reflexivity. , 2019, Sociology of health & illness.

[21]  Emily Sydnor,et al.  Disrespectful Democracy , 2019 .

[22]  Renee Barnes,et al.  Online Incivility and Public Debate: Nasty Talk, Gina Masullo Chen (2017) , 2019, Australian Journalism Review.

[23]  The Oxford Handbook of Electoral Persuasion , 2019 .

[24]  Adina Nerghes,et al.  Refugee or Migrant Crisis? Labels, Perceived Agency, and Sentiment Polarity in Online Discussions , 2018, Social Media + Society.

[25]  Ashley Muddiman,et al.  Personal and Public Levels of Political Incivility , 2017 .

[26]  Jae Kook Lee,et al.  Filtering out the other side? Cross-cutting and like-minded discussions on social networking sites , 2017, New Media Soc..

[27]  V. Štětka,et al.  Good girls don't comment on politics? Gendered character of online political participation in the Czech Republic , 2016 .

[28]  Leonie Rösner,et al.  Dangerous minds? Effects of uncivil online comments on aggressive cognitions, emotions, and behavior , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  David A. Askay.  Silence in the crowd: The spiral of silence contributing to the positive bias of opinions in an online review system , 2015, New Media Soc..

[30]  Emily K. Vraga,et al.  How individual sensitivities to disagreement shape youth political expression on Facebook , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Youngjune Kim,et al.  Seeing is Believing: Effects of Uncivil Online Debate on Political Polarization and Expectations of Deliberation , 2014 .

[32]  Vincent Cicchirillo,et al.  Living in an age of online incivility: examining the conditional indirect effects of online discussion on political flaming , 2014 .

[33]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments , 2014 .

[34]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  The "Nasty Effect: " Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies , 2014, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[35]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Affect, Not Ideology A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization , 2012 .

[36]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[37]  P. J. Conover,et al.  Studying ‘Everyday Political Talk’ in the Deliberative System , 2005 .

[38]  Lincoln Dahlberg.  The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[39]  M. Schudson,et al.  Why conversation is not the soul of democracy , 1997 .

[40]  J. Habermas.  The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society , 1986 .

[41]  Jihyang Choi.  Cross-Cutting Scanning, Integrating, and Interacting: Dimensions of Cross-Cutting Exposure on Social Media and Political Participation , 2021 .

[42]  Porismita Borah,et al.  Social media filtering and democracy: Effects of social media news use and uncivil political discussions on social media unfriending , 2021, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  G. Chen,et al.  Online Incivility and Public Debate , 2017 .

[44]  V. Štětka,et al.  A dialogue of the deaf, or communities of debate? The use of facebook in the 2013 Czech parliamentary elections campaign , 2014 .

[45]  Diana C. Mutz.  Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy , 2006 .

[46]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Why deliberative democracy , 2004 .

[47]  J. Dryzek.  Deliberative Democracy And Beyond , 2000 .

[48]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .