Metabolic and Demographic Feedbacks Shape the Emergent Spatial Structure and Function of Microbial Communities

Microbes are predominantly found in surface-attached and spatially structured polymicrobial communities. Within these communities, microbial cells excrete a wide range of metabolites, setting the stage for interspecific metabolic interactions. The links, however, between metabolic and ecological interactions (functional relationships), and species spatial organization (structural relationships) are still poorly understood. Here, we use an individual-based modelling framework to simulate the growth of a two-species surface-attached community where food (resource) is traded for detoxification (service) and investigate how metabolic constraints of individual species shape the emergent structural and functional relationships of the community. We show that strong metabolic interdependence drives the emergence of mutualism, robust interspecific mixing, and increased community productivity. Specifically, we observed a striking and highly stable emergent lineage branching pattern, generating a persistent lineage mixing that was absent when the metabolic exchange was removed. These emergent community properties are driven by demographic feedbacks, such that aid from neighbouring cells directly enhances focal cell growth, which in turn feeds back to neighbour fecundity. In contrast, weak metabolic interdependence drives conflict (exploitation or competition), and in turn greater interspecific segregation. Together, these results support the idea that species structural and functional relationships represent the net balance of metabolic interdependencies.

[1]  J. Bull,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 2004, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[2]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  Shihu Hu,et al.  Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage , 2013, Nature.

[4]  S. Séror,et al.  Branched swarming patterns on a synthetic medium formed by wild-type Bacillus subtilis strain 3610: detection of different cellular morphologies and constellations of cells as the complex architecture develops. , 2004, Microbiology.

[5]  William R. Harcombe,et al.  NOVEL COOPERATION EXPERIMENTALLY EVOLVED BETWEEN SPECIES , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  R. Kassen The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity , 2002 .

[7]  V. Cooper,et al.  Ecological succession in long-term experimentally evolved biofilms produces synergistic communities , 2011, The ISME Journal.

[8]  David A. Stahl,et al.  Rapid evolution of stability and productivity at the origin of a microbial mutualism , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  S. Molin,et al.  Spatial Organization of Microbial Biofilm Communities , 2000, Microbial Ecology.

[10]  J. Bronstein Our Current Understanding of Mutualism , 1994, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[11]  Hassan Sakhtah,et al.  Convergent evolution of hyperswarming leads to impaired biofilm formation in pathogenic bacteria. , 2013, Cell reports.

[12]  S. Frank Genetics of mutualism: the evolution of altruism between species. , 1994, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Microbial evolution in a simple unstructured environment: genetic differentiation in Escherichia coli. , 1994, Genetics.

[14]  G Stephanopoulos,et al.  Coexistence of S. cerevisiae and E. coli in chemostat under substrate competition and product inhibition , 1986, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  V. Bucci,et al.  The Evolution of Bacteriocin Production in Bacterial Biofilms , 2011, The American Naturalist.

[16]  J. Kreft,et al.  Biofilms promote altruism. , 2004, Microbiology.

[17]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Spatial structure often inhibits the evolution of cooperation in the snowdrift game , 2022 .

[18]  Wenying Shou,et al.  Strong inter-population cooperation leads to partner intermixing in microbial communities , 2013, eLife.

[19]  J. Ghigo,et al.  Multi-species biofilms: how to avoid unfriendly neighbors. , 2012, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[20]  P. Kolenbrander,et al.  Mutualistic Biofilm Communities Develop with Porphyromonas gingivalis and Initial, Early, and Late Colonizers of Enamel , 2009, Journal of bacteriology.

[21]  Carey D. Nadell,et al.  Emergence of Spatial Structure in Cell Groups and the Evolution of Cooperation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[22]  C. van Delden,et al.  Swarming of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is Dependent on Cell-to-Cell Signaling and Requires Flagella and Pili , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[23]  Measuring the Costs of Microbial Mutualism , 2011 .

[24]  A. Phillimore,et al.  Species Interactions Alter Evolutionary Responses to a Novel Environment , 2012, PLoS biology.

[25]  R. Lenski,et al.  Tests of Ecological Mechanisms Promoting the Stable Coexistence of Two Bacterial Genotypes , 1996 .

[26]  P. Stewart,et al.  Quantitative analysis of biofilm thickness variability , 1995, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  A. Griffin,et al.  Cooperation and Competition Between Relatives , 2002, Science.

[28]  K R Foster,et al.  A general model for the evolution of mutualisms , 2006, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[29]  R. Connor The Benefits of Mutualism: A Conceptual Framework , 1995 .

[30]  J. Gordon,et al.  A humanized gnotobiotic mouse model of host-archaeal-bacterial mutualism. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Choi,et al.  Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies bacterial community , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Paul B. Rainey,et al.  Evolution of species interactions in a biofilm community , 2007, Nature.

[33]  S. West,et al.  Spatial Structure and Interspecific Cooperation: Theory and an Empirical Test Using the Mycorrhizal Mutualism , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[34]  K. Foster,et al.  The Evolution of Mutualism in Gut Microbiota Via Host Epithelial Selection , 2012, PLoS biology.

[35]  K. Foster,et al.  A molecular mechanism that stabilizes cooperative secretions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2011, Molecular microbiology.

[36]  J. Seoane,et al.  Growth dependence of conjugation explains limited plasmid invasion in biofilms: an individual-based modelling study. , 2011, Environmental microbiology.

[37]  J. Hofkens,et al.  Architecture and spatial organization in a triple-species bacterial biofilm synergistically degrading the phenylurea herbicide linuron. , 2008, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[38]  Ehud Banin,et al.  Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. , 2012, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[39]  Sam P. Brown,et al.  From Metabolism to Ecology: Cross-Feeding Interactions Shape the Balance between Polymicrobial Conflict and Mutualism , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[40]  M. Doebeli,et al.  The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  Victoria J. Orphan,et al.  Diverse syntrophic partnerships from deep-sea methane vents revealed by direct cell capture and metagenomics , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  K. Foster,et al.  Cooperation and conflict in microbial biofilms , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Søren Molin,et al.  Metabolic Commensalism and Competition in a Two-Species Microbial Consortium , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[44]  A. Buckling,et al.  The interplay between microevolution and community structure in microbial populations. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[45]  S. Frank Foundations of Social Evolution , 2019 .

[46]  J. Costerton,et al.  Microbial Biofilms , 2011 .

[47]  J. Keasling,et al.  Commensal Interactions in a Dual-Species Biofilm Exposed to Mixed Organic Compounds , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[48]  Bernhard Schink,et al.  Synergistic interactions in the microbial world , 2002, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[49]  Cristian Picioreanu,et al.  iDynoMiCS: next-generation individual-based modelling of biofilms. , 2011, Environmental microbiology.

[50]  S. Molin,et al.  Role of commensal relationships on the spatial structure of a surface-attached microbial consortium. , 2000, Environmental microbiology.

[51]  M. Whiteley,et al.  A Novel Exclusion Mechanism for Carbon Resource Partitioning in Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[52]  K. Rumbaugh,et al.  Metabolite Cross-Feeding Enhances Virulence in a Model Polymicrobial Infection , 2011, PLoS pathogens.

[53]  C. Fuqua,et al.  Quorum sensing and motility mediate interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in biofilm cocultures. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Structured growth and genetic drift raise relatedness in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2012, Biology Letters.

[55]  Sam P. Brown,et al.  Molecular and regulatory properties of a public good shape the evolution of cooperation , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Sara Mitri,et al.  Social evolution in multispecies biofilms , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  D. Queller,et al.  Does population viscosity promote kin selection? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[58]  M. Baalen,et al.  Self-structuring in spatial evolutionary ecology. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[59]  Frances H. Arnold,et al.  Self-Organization, Layered Structure, and Aggregation Enhance Persistence of a Synthetic Biofilm Consortium , 2011, PloS one.