IEA SHC Task 61 / EBC Annex 77 Integrated Solutions for Daylighting and Electric Lighting / Subtask D: Lab and Field Study Performance Tracking

The recently launched IEA SHC Task 61 aims at fostering the integration of daylighting and electric lighting solutions for the benefit of higher user satisfaction and energy savings at the same time. In order to drastically reduce the energy use of buildings daylighting, electric lighting and associated controls must be integrated, and the role of the user should be considered in the integration process. An effective means for promoting good examples of integration is reporting on successful case studies. In this perspective, a part of the IEA SHC Task 61, Subtask D, investigates existing knowledge for integrated solutions, proposes a monitoring protocol to evaluate integrated projects and, finally, presents exemplary case studies of integrated design. In this paper, we describe the structure and current status of IEA SHC Task 61 Subtask D. (Less)

[1]  Harald Haas,et al.  What is LiFi? , 2015, 2015 European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[2]  T. Laike,et al.  The effects of user interface designs on lighting use , 2017 .

[3]  Alan Meier.  New standby power targets , 2019 .

[4]  Harald Haas,et al.  A guide to wireless networking by light , 2017 .

[5]  Veronica Garcia-Hansen,et al.  ENERGY SAVING POTENTIAL FOR INTEGRATED DAYLIGHTING AND ELECTRIC LIGHTING DESIGN VIA USER-DRIVEN SOLUTIONS: A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2019, PROCEEDINGS OF the 29th Quadrennial Session of the CIE.

[6]  Iason Konstantzos,et al.  Occupant interactions with shading and lighting systems using different control interfaces: A pilot field study , 2016 .

[7]  E. J. van Loenen,et al.  Automated blinds with light feedback to increase occupant satisfaction and energy saving , 2016 .

[8]  Werner Osterhaus,et al.  Tangible lighting controls—Reporting end-users' interactions with lighting control interfaces , 2011 .

[9]  M. Narayan,et al.  Environmental assessment. , 1997, Home healthcare nurse.

[10]  Alexander Rosemann,et al.  Photometric measurements of lighting quality: An overview , 2018, Building and Environment.

[11]  Niko Gentile,et al.  Field data and simulations to estimate the role of standby energy use of lighting control systems in individual offices , 2017 .

[12]  A. Carrico,et al.  Motivating energy conservation in the workplace: An evaluation of the use of group-level feedback and peer education , 2011 .

[13]  Brian Orland,et al.  Saving energy in an office environment: A serious game intervention , 2014 .

[14]  Staffan Hygge,et al.  POE Post occupancy evaluation of daylight in buildings : A report of IEA SHC TASK 21/ECBCS ANNEX 29 , 2000 .

[15]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  Measuring and using light in the melanopsin age , 2014, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  Cláudia Naves David Amorim,et al.  A toolbox to evaluate non-residential lighting and daylighting retrofit in practice , 2016 .