Participatory-based risk impact propagation and interaction pattern analysis using social network analysis

Purpose: This paper aims to develop a novel risk analysis model that uses both participatory and computerized techniques to capture and model the dynamic of risk impact propagation and interaction pattern. Design/methodology/approach: In this research, an integrated model, applying modified participatory method and novel dichotomize procedure in the perspectives of social network topological analysis, is developed. Findings: Based on the analysis output, it is found that; (i) the risk propagation is characterized by its dynamic and non-linear impact pattern, and (ii) the risk interaction is distinguished based on the degree of connectedness between various risks. Research limitations/implications: This research assumes that the risk impact propagation and interaction pattern within the risk network are static. Further research is required to analyze the risk network in dynamic circumstances. Practical implications: This research contributes in delivering practical tools that could potentially provide a further path for developing mitigation strategy and policies that seek to address the complexity of risk phenomena, and thus enhance community resilience. Social implications: This research reveals some underlying patterns of how the risk impact propagation and interaction pattern are structured. Thus, it can help decision-makers make formal arrangements of particular urban infrastructure (UI) governance visible toward building risk plan and mitigation strategies. Originality/value: This research contributes to filling the risk management knowledge gap. It is suggested that analyzing risk using a network approach is suited to capture the intricate processes that shape the complexity of UI risk structural network. By validating the model, this research shows the applicability and capability of the model to improve both the RA accuracy and decision making effectiveness towards risk mitigation plan and strategy.

[1]  K. Ingold,et al.  Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[2]  C. Prell,et al.  Stakeholder Analysis and Social Network Analysis in Natural Resource Management , 2009, Society & Natural Resources.

[3]  Ludovic-Alexandre Vidal,et al.  Understanding project complexity: implications on project management , 2008, Kybernetes.

[4]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Application of dynamic Bayesian network to risk analysis of domino effects in chemical infrastructures , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[5]  Arjen Boin,et al.  Managing Transboundary Crises: Identifying the Building Blocks of an Effective Response System , 2010 .

[6]  Jose M. Yusta,et al.  Using interconnected risk maps to assess the threats faced by electricity infrastructures , 2013, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructure Prot..

[7]  Jin Wang,et al.  A risk assessment approach to improve the resilience of a seaport system using Bayesian networks , 2016 .

[8]  Rebecca J. Yang,et al.  Stakeholder-associated risks and their interactions in complex green building projects: a social network model , 2014 .

[9]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices , 2007 .

[10]  Dong Liu,et al.  Social network analysis of the vulnerabilities of interdependent critical infrastructures , 2008, Int. J. Crit. Infrastructures.

[11]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework , 1988 .

[12]  R. Yang,et al.  An investigation of stakeholder analysis in urban development projects: empirical or rationalistic perspectives , 2014 .

[13]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Domino effect analysis of dust explosions using Bayesian networks , 2016 .

[14]  To dichotomize or not to dichotomize? , 2008, Nutrition.

[15]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Network theory-based analysis of risk interactions in large engineering projects , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..