Development of a clinical prediction rule to improve peripheral intravenous cannulae first attempt success in the emergency department and reduce post insertion failure rates: the Vascular Access Decisions in the Emergency Room (VADER) study protocol

Introduction Peripheral intravenous cannula (PIVC) insertion is one of the most common clinical interventions performed in emergency care worldwide. However, factors associated with successful PIVC placement and maintenance are not well understood. This study seeks to determine the predictors of first time PIVC insertion success in emergency department (ED) and identify the rationale for removal of the ED inserted PIVC in patients admitted to the hospital ward. Reducing failed insertion attempts and improving peripheral intravenous cannulation practice could lead to better staff and patient experiences, as well as improving hospital efficiency. Methods and analysis We propose an observational cohort study of PIVC insertions in a patient population presenting to ED, with follow-up observation of the PIVC in subsequent admissions to the hospital ward. We will collect specific PIVC observational data such as; clinician factors, patient factors, device information and clinical practice variables. Trained researchers will gather ED PIVC insertion data to identify predictors of insertion success. In those admitted from the ED, we will determine the dwell time of the ED-inserted PIVC. Multivariate regression analyses will be used to identify factors associated with insertions success and PIVC failure and standard statistical validation techniques will be used to create and assess the effectiveness of a clinical predication rule. Ethics and dissemination The findings of our study will provide new evidence to improve insertion success rates in the ED setting and identify strategies to reduce premature device failure for patients admitted to hospital wards. Results will unravel a complexity of factors that contribute to unsuccessful PIVC attempts such as patient and clinician factors along with the products, technologies and infusates used. Trial registration number ACTRN12615000588594; Pre-results.

[1]  J. Aguado,et al.  Hospital-wide survey of the adequacy in the number of vascular catheters and catheter lumens. , 2014, Journal of hospital medicine.

[2]  S. Weiner,et al.  Single-Operator Ultrasound-Guided IV Placement by Emergency Nurses , 2011 .

[3]  W. Satz,et al.  Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access vs. the external jugular vein as the initial approach to the patient with difficult vascular access. , 2010, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[4]  P. Juvin,et al.  Is Peripheral Line Placement More Difficult in Obese Than in Lean Patients? , 2003, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[5]  E. Winslow,et al.  Variables influencing intravenous catheter insertion difficulty and failure: an analysis of 339 intravenous catheter insertions. , 2005, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[6]  J. Fields,et al.  Risk factors associated with difficult venous access in adult ED patients. , 2014, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[7]  Frey Am Success rates for peripheral i.v. insertion in a children's hospital. Financial implications. , 1998 .

[8]  M. Wallis,et al.  Inter-rater agreement on PIVC-associated phlebitis signs, symptoms and scales. , 2015, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[9]  L. Dougherty Intravenous therapy in older patients. , 2013, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[10]  A. Moss,et al.  Injury to the lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm after venous cannulation: A case report and literature review , 2012, Clinical anatomy.

[11]  K. Yen,et al.  Validation and refinement of the difficult intravenous access score: a clinical prediction rule for identifying children with difficult intravenous access. , 2011, Academic Emergency Medicine.

[12]  J. Catineau,et al.  Prospective evaluation of peripheral venous access difficulty in emergency care , 2007, Intensive Care Medicine.

[13]  J. C. de la Torre-Montero,et al.  Venous International Assessment, VIA Scale, Validated Classification Procedure for the Peripheral Venous System , 2014, The journal of vascular access.

[14]  Joan Webster,et al.  Development and validation of a Vein Assessment Tool (VAT). , 2007, The Australian journal of advanced nursing : a quarterly publication of the Royal Australian Nursing Federation.

[15]  H. M. Kim Sample Size Determination and Power , 2015 .

[16]  A J Barton,et al.  Improving patient outcomes through CQI: vascular access planning. , 1998, Journal of nursing care quality.

[17]  E. Snoey,et al.  Ultrasound-guided brachial and basilic vein cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[18]  M. Drissi,et al.  [Peripheral intravenous access in the operating room: characteristics and predictors of difficulty]. , 2012, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[19]  R. Moorehead,et al.  Back to basics: iatrogenic intravenous cannula embolus. , 2013, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[20]  G. Hendey,et al.  Predictors of success in nurse-performed ultrasound-guided cannulation. , 2007, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[21]  G. Cicolini,et al.  Position of peripheral venous cannulae and the incidence of thrombophlebitis: an observational study. , 2009, Journal of advanced nursing.

[22]  E. Gillespie,et al.  Peripheral intravenous catheter‐associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: more than 5 years of prospective data from two tertiary health services , 2013, The Medical journal of Australia.

[23]  M. Wilcox,et al.  epic3: National Evidence-Based Guidelines for Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections in NHS Hospitals in England , 2007, Journal of Hospital Infection.

[24]  Darren Braude,et al.  Ultrasound-guidance vs. standard technique in difficult vascular access patients by ED technicians. , 2009, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[25]  D. Phelan,et al.  Vessel Health and Preservation (Part 1): A New Evidence-Based Approach to Vascular Access Selection and Management , 2012, The journal of vascular access.

[26]  J. Fields,et al.  Association between Multiple IV attempts and Perceived Pain levels in the Emergency Department , 2014, The journal of vascular access.

[27]  K. Yen,et al.  Derivation of the DIVA Score: A Clinical Prediction Rule for the Identification of Children With Difficult Intravenous Access , 2008, Pediatric emergency care.

[28]  K. Jenkins II. Needle phobia: a psychological perspective. , 2014, British journal of anaesthesia.

[29]  Morgan Le Guen,et al.  Efficacy of AccuVein to facilitate peripheral intravenous placement in adults presenting to an emergency department: a randomized clinical trial. , 2014, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[30]  A. Hornero,et al.  Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of peripheral venous catheter-related bloodstream infections at a university-affiliated hospital. , 2007, The Journal of hospital infection.

[31]  P. Ishimine,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement Versus Traditional Techniques in Difficult-Access Pediatric Patients , 2009, Pediatric emergency care.

[32]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Clinical Prediction Rules , 2004 .

[33]  M. Wallis,et al.  Risk Factors for Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Failure: A Multivariate Analysis of Data from a Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[34]  J Matthew Fields,et al.  Decrease in central venous catheter placement due to use of ultrasound guidance for peripheral intravenous catheters. , 2012, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[35]  M. Stone,et al.  Ultrasonographically guided insertion of a 15-cm catheter into the deep brachial or basilic vein in patients with difficult intravenous access. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[36]  A. Arribi Vilela,et al.  Indwell times, complications and costs of open vs closed safety peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomized study. , 2014, The Journal of hospital infection.

[37]  M. Witting IV access difficulty: incidence and delays in an urban emergency department. , 2012, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[38]  L. Mermel,et al.  Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia , 2011, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[39]  L. Furtado,et al.  Maintenance of peripheral venous access and its impact on the development of phlebitis: a survey of 186 catheters in a general surgery department in Portugal. , 2011 .

[40]  P. Claret,et al.  Predicting peripheral venous access difficulty in the emergency department using body mass index and a clinical evaluation of venous accessibility. , 2013, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[41]  C. Kalkman,et al.  Predictive factors for difficult intravenous cannulation in pediatric patients at a tertiary pediatric hospital , 2012, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[42]  G. de Filippi,et al.  Standard-length catheters vs long catheters in ultrasound-guided peripheral vein cannulation. , 2012, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[43]  J. Concato,et al.  A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[44]  Martha Sajatovic,et al.  Clinical Prediction Models , 2013 .

[45]  W. Satz,et al.  Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous access versus traditional approaches in patients with difficult intravenous access. , 2005, Annals of emergency medicine.

[46]  S. Harrison,et al.  Implementing and standardising the use of peripheral vascular access devices. , 2010, Journal of clinical nursing.

[47]  Tzung-Yi Tsai,et al.  Risk factors for peripheral intravenous catheter infection in hospitalized patients: a prospective study of 3165 patients. , 2009, American journal of infection control.

[48]  Daniel McDermott,et al.  Ultrasonographically guided peripheral intravenous cannulation in emergency department patients with difficult intravenous access: a randomized trial. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[49]  C. Kalkman,et al.  The Effectiveness of a Near-Infrared Vascular Imaging Device to Support Intravenous Cannulation in Children with Dark Skin Color: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial , 2013, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[50]  K. Boniface,et al.  ED technicians can successfully place ultrasound-guided intravenous catheters in patients with poor vascular access. , 2011, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[51]  Thomas P. Ryan,et al.  Sample Size Determination and Power: Ryan/Sample , 2013 .

[52]  T. Kropmans,et al.  A pilot intravenous cannulation team: an Irish perspective. , 2010, British journal of nursing.

[53]  J. Feldman,et al.  Ultrasonography-guided peripheral intravenous catheter survival in ED patients with difficult access. , 2010, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[54]  A. M. Frey,et al.  Success rates for peripheral i.v. insertion in a children's hospital. Financial implications. , 1998, Journal of intravenous nursing : the official publication of the Intravenous Nurses Society.

[55]  M. Blaivas,et al.  Emergency nurses' utilization of ultrasound guidance for placement of peripheral intravenous lines in difficult-access patients. , 2004, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[56]  G. Mihala,et al.  Vascular access specialist teams for device insertion and prevention of failure. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[57]  R. Stuart,et al.  Half of all peripheral intravenous lines in an Australian tertiary emergency department are unused: pain with no gain? , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[58]  D Mbamalu,et al.  Methods of obtaining peripheral venous access in difficult situations , 1999, Postgraduate medical journal.

[59]  Gabrielle Walsh Difficult Peripheral Venous Access: Recognizing and Managing the Patient at Risk , 2008 .

[60]  J Matthew Fields,et al.  The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity. , 2012, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[61]  L. Mermel,et al.  International prevalence of the use of peripheral intravenous catheters. , 2015, Journal of hospital medicine.

[62]  M. Drissi,et al.  Accès veineux périphériques au bloc opératoire : caractéristiques et facteurs prédictifs de difficulté , 2012 .

[63]  J. Pines,et al.  What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[64]  Cheryl Tatano Beck,et al.  The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. , 2006, Research in nursing & health.

[65]  C. Budgeon,et al.  Insertion of Peripheral Intravenous Cannulae in the Emergency Department: Factors Associated with First-time Insertion Success , 2015, The journal of vascular access.

[66]  P. Scuffham,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Clinically Indicated Versus Routine Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters , 2014, Applied Health Economics and Health Policy.

[67]  Charles E McCulloch,et al.  Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[68]  M. B. O’Neill,et al.  Validating the Difficult Intravenous Access Clinical Prediction Rule , 2012, Pediatric emergency care.

[69]  R. Cydulka,et al.  Success of ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access with skin marking. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[70]  M. Pedreira,et al.  Predisposing factors for peripheral intravenous puncture failure in children. , 2012, Revista latino-americana de enfermagem.

[71]  Didier Pittet,et al.  Peripheral venous catheters: an under-evaluated problem. , 2009, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[72]  A. Jacobson,et al.  Intradermal normal saline solution, self-selected music, and insertion difficulty effects on intravenous insertion pain. , 1999, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[73]  P. Scuffham,et al.  The epic3 recommendation that clinically indicated replacement of peripheral venous catheters is safe and cost-saving: how much would the NHS save? , 2014, The Journal of hospital infection.