A Review of the Regulatory Energy Performance Gap and Its Underlying Causes in Non-domestic Buildings

This paper reviews the discrepancy between predicted and measured energy use in non-domestic buildings in a UK context with outlook to global studies. It explains differences between energy performance quantification and classifies this energy performance gap as a difference between compliance or performance modelling with measured energy use. Literary sources are reviewed in order to signify the magnitude between predicted and measured energy use, which is found to deviate by +34% with a standard deviation of 55% based on 62 buildings. It proceeds in describing the underlying causes for the performance gap, existent in all stages of the building life cycle, and identifies the dominant factors to be related to specification uncertainty in modelling, occupant behaviour and poor operational practices having an estimated effect of 20-60%, 10-80% and 15-80% on energy use respectively. Other factors that have a high impact are related to establishing the energy performance target, impact of early design decisions, heuristic uncertainty in modelling and occupant behaviour. Finally action measures and feedback processes in order to reduce the performance gap are discussed, indicating the need for energy in-use legislation, insight into design stage models, accessible energy data and expansion of research efforts towards building performance in-use in relation to predicted performance

[1]  J. New,et al.  Evaluation of weather datasets for building energy simulation , 2012 .

[2]  M. S. De Wit,et al.  Uncertainty in predictions of thermal comfort in buildings , 2001 .

[3]  Jelena Srebric,et al.  BUILDING CLASSIFICATION BASED ON SIMULATED ANNUAL RESULTS: TOWARDS REALISTIC BUILDING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS , 2013 .

[4]  Paul Raftery,et al.  CALIBRATION OF A DETAILED BES MODEL TO MEASURED DATA USING AN EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYTICAL OPTIMISATION APPROACH , 2011 .

[5]  J.L.M. Hensen.  Energy simulation in building design , 1992 .

[6]  Charles Culp,et al.  Uncalibrated Building Energy Simulation Modeling Results , 2006 .

[7]  Jeff Haberl,et al.  Procedures for Calibrating Hourly Simulation Models to Measured Building Energy and Environmental Data , 1998 .

[8]  Keith A. Jones,et al.  The potential for energy reduction in UK commercial offices through effective management and behaviour change , 2014 .

[9]  M. Mahdi Salehi,et al.  IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE OF A WHOLE-BUILDING ENERGY MODELING TOOL BY USING POST-OCCUPANCY MEASURED DATA , 2013 .

[10]  Alan Meier,et al.  Behavioral strategies to bridge the gap between potential and actual savings in commercial buildings , 2013 .

[11]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in building performance simulation for design support , 2011 .

[12]  Michael Wetter,et al.  A framework for simulation-based real-time whole building performance assessment , 2012 .

[13]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Analysis of uncertainty in building design evaluations and its implications , 2002 .

[14]  Tianzhen Hong,et al.  Occupant Behavior: Impact onEnergy Use of Private Offices , 2013 .

[15]  Rokia Raslan,et al.  Variations in results of building energy simulation tools, and their impact on BREEAM and LEED ratings: A case study , 2013 .

[16]  Rokia Raslan,et al.  Results variability in accredited building energy performance compliance demonstration software in the UK: an inter-model comparative study , 2010 .

[17]  A. Wright,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of energy metering data from non-domestic buildings , 2010 .

[18]  Tadj Oreszczyn,et al.  Challenges for energy and buildings research: objectives, methods and funding mechanisms , 2010 .

[19]  I. Agency,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2000 , 2000 .

[20]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  Towards measurement and verification of energy performance under the framework of the European directive for energy performance of buildings , 2014 .

[21]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap , 2012 .

[22]  Massimiliano Manfren,et al.  Calibration and uncertainty analysis for computer models – A meta-model based approach for integrated building energy simulation , 2013 .

[23]  Paul Raftery,et al.  Calibrating whole building energy models: An evidence-based methodology , 2011 .

[24]  Michael Kleber,et al.  Results of Monitoring a Naturally Ventilated and Passively Cooled Office Building in Frankfurt a.M., Germany , 2007 .

[25]  David Lee,et al.  ENERNET: Studying the dynamic relationship between building occupancy and energy consumption , 2012 .

[26]  Piette,et al.  Over the energy edge: Results from a seven year new commercial buildings research and demonstration project , 1994 .

[27]  Rick Diamond,et al.  Evaluating the energy performance of the first generation of LEED-certified commercial buildings , 2006 .

[28]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Uncertainty in developing supervisory demand-side controls in buildings: A framework and guidance , 2013 .

[29]  Xiufeng Pang,et al.  Uncertainties in Energy Consumption Introduced by Building Operations and Weather for a Medium-Size Office Building , 2012 .

[30]  Minoru Mizuno,et al.  Energy saving potential of office equipment power management , 2004 .

[31]  Paul Raftery,et al.  A review of methods to match building energy simulation models to measured data , 2014 .

[32]  Paul Raftery,et al.  CALIBRATION OF WHOLE BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION MODELS: DETAILED CASE STUDY OF A NATURALLY VENTILATED BUILDING USING HOURLY MEASURED DATA , 2012 .

[33]  Jon Hand,et al.  CONTRASTING THE CAPABILITIES OF BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE SIMULATION PROGRAMS , 2008 .

[34]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Modelling Electricity Consumption in Office Buildings: An Agent Based Approach , 2013, ArXiv.

[35]  Kimberly M. Fowler,et al.  Re-Assessing Green Building Performance: A Post Occupancy Evaluation of 22 GSA Buildings , 2010 .

[36]  Duane Jonlin.  Bridging the Energy Performance Gap: Real-World Tools , 2014 .

[37]  R. Judkoff,et al.  Lessons Learned from Case Studies of Six High-Performance Buildings , 2006 .

[38]  Ardeshir Mahdavi,et al.  USER BEHAVIOR AND ENERGY PERFORMANCE IN BUILDINGS , 2009 .

[39]  Dejan Mumovic,et al.  PERFORMANCE GAP AND THERMAL MODELLING: A COMPARISON OF SIMULATION RESULTS AND ACTUAL ENERGY PERFORMANCE FOR AN ACADEMY IN NORTH WEST ENGLAND , 2012 .

[40]  CARBON COMPLIANCE FOR TOMORROW’S NEW HOMES A REVIEW OF THE MODELLING TOOL AND ASSUMPTIONS , 2010 .

[41]  Fu Xiao,et al.  Quantitative energy performance assessment methods for existing buildings , 2012 .

[42]  Raymond J. Cole,et al.  Learning from failure: understanding the anticipated–achieved building energy performance gap , 2015 .

[43]  Gang Wu,et al.  Calibrated building energy simulation and its application in a high-rise commercial building in Shanghai , 2007 .

[44]  Ian Paul Knight,et al.  Predicting Operational Energy Consumption Profiles - Findings from Detailed Surveys and Modelling in a UK Educational Building Compared to Measured Consumption , 2008 .

[45]  O. T. Masoso,et al.  The dark side of occupants’ behaviour on building energy use , 2010 .

[46]  Vincent Lemort,et al.  Evidence-based calibration of a building energy simulation model: Application to an office building in Belgium , 2012 .

[47]  Elie Azar,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of the impact of occupancy parameters in energy simulation of office buildings , 2012 .

[48]  J. Prins.  Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council , 2006 .

[49]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation , 2014 .

[50]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Uncertainty quantification of microclimate variables in building energy models , 2014 .

[51]  Robert Cohen,et al.  Mandating transparency about building energy performance in use , 2015 .

[52]  Martin Fischer,et al.  A method to compare simulated and measured data to assess building energy performance , 2012 .

[53]  J. Saunderson.  Briefing: Carbon reductions in new non-domestic buildings , 2008 .

[54]  Anthony Calderone.  SIMULATION VERSUS REALITY - 4 CASE STUDIES , 2011 .

[55]  Paul Cooper,et al.  Understanding the risks and uncertainties introduced by common assumptions in energy simulations for Australian commercial buildings , 2014 .

[56]  R. Judkoff,et al.  Applying the building energy simulation test (BESTEST) diagnostic method to verification of space conditioning equipment models used in whole-building energy simulation programs , 2002 .

[57]  Pieter de Wilde,et al.  Longitudinal prediction of the operational energy use of buildings , 2011 .

[58]  L. K. Norford,et al.  Two-to-one discrepancy between measured and predicted performance of a ‘low-energy’ office building: insights from a reconciliation based on the DOE-2 model , 1994 .

[59]  E Burman,et al.  S-curves to model and visualise the energy performance gap between design and reality – first steps to a practical tool , 2015 .

[60]  Yeonsook Heo,et al.  Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty , 2012 .

[61]  Adrian Leaman,et al.  Assessing building performance in use 3: energy performance of the Probe buildings , 2001 .

[62]  Dirk Saelens,et al.  Implementing realistic occupant behavior in building energy simulations – the effect on the results of an optimization of office buildings , 2010 .

[63]  Michael Wetter,et al.  A view on future building system modeling and simulation , 2011, Building Performance Simulation for Design and Operation.

[64]  Thomas Bednar,et al.  Validation and evaluation of total energy use in office buildings: A case study , 2012 .

[65]  Andreas K. Athienitis,et al.  A methodology for identifying the influence of design variations on building energy performance , 2014 .