Screening models for integrated environmental planning – A feasibility study for Flanders

Abstract The Flemish environment is under increasing pressure of urbanization, air and water pollution, the fragmentation of the natural landscape and other anthropogenic stressors. Although the regulatory frameworks imposed by the EU, Belgian and Flemish government to address these problems are based on clear time paths for reaching the objectives, the level of thematic integration is low. Long-term prospective studies such as the Environment Outlook 2030 and the Nature Outlook 2030 have been carried out to evaluate the existing status of the environment and nature and associated policies, anticipating on the long-term developments. Sectoral and static models cannot adequately describe the interactions between the themes and consequences of system feedback. A four-step approach using a skeleton model framework is proposed here to describe the functioning of Flanders as an integrated social, economic and environmental system at a high level of abstraction. A feasibility study was carried out to examine and compare the potential applicability of a broad range of models in the framework of the four-step approach. The analysis includes a graphical representation of the causalities linking the key state variables of the system, criteria to assess the extent to which thematic models could be applied in the four-step approach, and a ranking for a selection of models. The conceptual difficulties of the approach and usefulness for model selection are discussed.

[1]  Elmar Kriegler,et al.  Improving environmental change research with systematic techniques for qualitative scenarios , 2012 .

[2]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Integrated assessment and modelling: Overview and synthesis of salient dimensions , 2015, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  John N. Warfield,et al.  World dynamics , 1973 .

[4]  G. Turner A comparison of The Limits to Growth with 30 years of reality , 2008 .

[5]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[7]  Norman,et al.  Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. , 1966 .

[8]  A. Bagheri,et al.  Navigating towards sustainable development: A system dynamics approach , 2006 .

[9]  Olaf Helmer Reassessment of cross-impact analysis , 1981 .

[10]  Wout Dullaert,et al.  An analysis of household waste management policy using system dynamics modelling , 2011, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[11]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Virtual Worlds as Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1994, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[12]  M. Borowitzka Limits to Growth , 1998 .

[13]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[14]  John Icely,et al.  A review of the application and evolution of the DPSIR framework with an emphasis on coastal social-ecological systems , 2015 .

[15]  Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle,et al.  Cross-impact balances: A system-theoretical approach to cross-impact analysis , 2006 .

[16]  John D. Sterman,et al.  System Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002 .

[17]  R G Coyle,et al.  System Dynamics Modelling: A Practical Approach , 1996 .

[18]  Alexey A. Voinov,et al.  'Integronsters', integral and integrated modeling , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  B. Hayes Computation and the Human Predicament , 2012 .

[20]  Other Modelling environmental change in Europe: towards a model inventory (SEIS/Forward) , 2008 .

[21]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps as a communication and learning tool , 2010 .

[22]  Guy Engelen Models in Policy Formulation and Assessment: The WadBOS Decision‐Support System , 2013 .

[23]  Antonie J. Jetter,et al.  Building scenarios with Fuzzy Cognitive Maps: An exploratory study of solar energy , 2011 .

[24]  Kasper Kok,et al.  The potential of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil , 2009 .

[25]  R. Axelrod Structure of decision : the cognitive maps of political elites , 2015 .

[26]  Joseph H. A. Guillaume,et al.  Characterising performance of environmental models , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[27]  K. Stave Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions , 2002 .

[28]  J. Forrester Principles of systems : text and workbook, chapters 1 through 10 , 1968 .

[29]  J. B. Gregersen,et al.  OpenMI: Open modelling interface , 2007 .

[30]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Environmental decision support systems (EDSS) development - Challenges and best practices , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[31]  E. Papageorgiou,et al.  Using Fuzzy Cognitive Mapping in Environmental Decision Making and Management: A Methodological Primer and an Application , 2012 .

[32]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Business dynamics : systems thinking and modelling for acomplex world , 2002 .

[33]  Olaf Helmer,et al.  Cross-impact gaming☆ , 1972 .

[34]  A. Bassi,et al.  Informing the US Energy Policy Debate with Threshold 21 , 2010 .

[35]  Jude Herijadi Kurniawan,et al.  Systematically linking qualitative elements of scenarios across levels, scales, and sectors , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[36]  Guillermo A. Mendoza,et al.  Participatory modeling and analysis for sustainable forest management: Overview of soft system dynamics models and applications ☆ , 2006 .

[37]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Progress in integrated assessment and modelling , 2002, Environ. Model. Softw..

[38]  Diana Wright,et al.  Thinking in systems: a primer , 2012 .

[39]  Jean-Luc de Kok,et al.  Elbe DSS: a planning support system for strategic river basin planning , 2009 .

[40]  Uygar Özesmi,et al.  Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach , 2004 .