Quantum like modeling of decision making: Quantifying uncertainty with the aid of Heisenberg–Robertson inequality

This paper contributes to quantum-like modeling of decision making (DM) under uncertainty through application of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle (in the form of the Robertson inequality). In this paper we apply this instrument to quantify uncertainty in DM performed by quantum-like agents. As an example, we apply the Heisenberg uncertainty principle to the determination of mutual interrelation of uncertainties for “incompatible questions” used to be asked in political opinion pools. We also consider the problem of representation of decision problems, e.g., in the form of questions, by Hermitian operators, commuting and noncommuting, corresponding to compatible and incompatible questions respectively. Our construction unifies the two different situations (compatible versus incompatible mental observables), by means of a single Hilbert space and of a deformation parameter which can be tuned to describe these opposite cases. One of the main foundational consequences of this paper for cognitive psychology is formalization of the mutual uncertainty about incompatible questions with the aid of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle implying the mental state dependence of (in)compatibility of questions.

[1]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Context-Content Systems of Random Variables: The Contextuality-by-Default Theory , 2015, 1511.03516.

[2]  M. Machina "Expected Utility" Analysis without the Independence Axiom , 1982 .

[3]  Diederik Aerts,et al.  Generalizing Prototype Theory: A Formal Quantum Framework , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[4]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  On Selective Influences, Marginal Selectivity, and Bell/CHSH Inequalities , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[5]  Jennifer S Trueblood,et al.  A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment errors. , 2011, Psychological review.

[6]  Masanao Ozawa,et al.  Quantum Reality and Measurement: A Quantum Logical Approach , 2009, 0911.1147.

[7]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[8]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Contextuality is about identity of random variables , 2014, 1405.2116.

[9]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[10]  Sébastien Duchêne,et al.  Testing quantum-like models of judgment for question order effect , 2015, Math. Soc. Sci..

[11]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Statistical and subjective interpretations of probability in quantum-like models of cognition and decision making , 2016 .

[12]  Fintan Costello,et al.  Surprisingly rational: probability theory plus noise explains biases in judgment. , 2012, Psychological review.

[13]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum-like generalization of the Bayesian updating scheme for objective and subjective mental uncertainties , 2012 .

[14]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  On Quantum-Like Probabilistic Structure of Mental Information , 2004, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[15]  Stuart R. Hameroff,et al.  QUANTUM COHERENCE IN MICROTUBULES: A NEURAL BASIS FOR EMERGENT CONSCIOUSNESS? 1 , 1994 .

[16]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  Understanding cooperation in the Prisoner’s Dilemma game , 2011 .

[17]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Question Order Model Supported by Empirical Tests of an A Priori and Precise Prediction , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty , 1992 .

[19]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Quantum dynamics of human decision-making , 2006 .

[20]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Noncontextuality with marginal selectivity in reconstructing mental architectures , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[21]  Janne Kujala,et al.  Probabilistic foundations of contextuality , 2016, 1604.08412.

[22]  Andrei Khrennivov,et al.  Classical and Quantum Mechanics on Information Spaces with Applications to Cognitive, Psychological, Social, and Anomalous Phenomena , 1999, quant-ph/0003016.

[23]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  Instability of political preferences and the role of mass media: a dynamical representation in a quantum framework , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[24]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum Adaptivity in Biology: From Genetics to Cognition , 2015, Springer Netherlands.

[25]  Vincenzo Crupi,et al.  On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[26]  Masanao Ozawa,et al.  Quantum Set Theory Extending the Standard Probabilistic Interpretation of Quantum Theory , 2015, New Generation Computing.

[27]  David W. Moore Measuring New Types of Question-Order Effects: Additive and Subtractive , 2002 .

[28]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Contextuality in canonical systems of random variables , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  N. Schwarz ATTITUDE CONSTRUCTION: EVALUATION IN CONTEXT , 2007 .

[31]  D. Ellsberg Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[32]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Possibility to agree on disagree from quantum information and decision making , 2014 .

[33]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  A Quantum Probability Model of Causal Reasoning , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[34]  Emmanuel Haven,et al.  A Generalized Probability Framework to Model Economic Agents' Decisions Under Uncertainty , 2015, 1511.06734.

[35]  Masanao Ozawa Quantum perfect correlations , 2006 .

[36]  M. Allais Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[37]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[38]  Fabio Bagarello,et al.  (H, ρ)-induced dynamics and the quantum game of life , 2017 .

[39]  Andrei Khrennikov Quantum-like formalism for cognitive measurements. , 2003, Bio Systems.

[40]  J. Acacio de Barros,et al.  Quantum-like model of behavioral response computation using neural oscillators , 2012, Biosyst..

[41]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[42]  Gary Oas,et al.  Negative probabilities and counter-factual reasoning in quantum cognition , 2014, 1404.3921.

[43]  Fabio Bagarello,et al.  An Operator View on Alliances in Politics , 2015, SIAM J. Appl. Math..

[44]  Michael Barr,et al.  The Emperor's New Mind , 1989 .

[45]  Fabio Bagarello,et al.  Quantum Dynamics for Classical Systems: With Applications of the Number Operator , 2012 .

[46]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Bayesianism as the basis of general theory of decision-making , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[47]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Are quantum-mechanical-like models possible, or necessary, outside quantum physics? , 2014 .

[48]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  A quantum-like model of selection behavior , 2017, 1705.08536.