Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data

Intensity-based classification of MR images has proven problematic, even when advanced techniques are used. Intrascan and interscan intensity inhomogeneities are a common source of difficulty. While reported methods have had some success in correcting intrascan inhomogeneities, such methods require supervision for the individual scan. This paper describes a new method called adaptive segmentation that uses knowledge of tissue intensity properties and intensity inhomogeneities to correct and segment MR images. Use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm leads to a method that allows for more accurate segmentation of tissue types as well as better visualization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, that has proven to be effective in a study that includes more than 1000 brain scans. Implementation and results are described for segmenting the brain in the following types of images: axial (dual-echo spin-echo), coronal [three dimensional Fourier transform (3-DFT) gradient-echo T1-weighted] all using a conventional head coil, and a sagittal section acquired using a surface coil. The accuracy of adaptive segmentation was found to be comparable with manual segmentation, and closer to manual segmentation than supervised multivariant classification while segmenting gray and white matter.

[1]  Jorge Herbert de Lira,et al.  Two-Dimensional Signal and Image Processing , 1989 .

[2]  L. Axel,et al.  Intensity correction in surface-coil MR imaging. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  D. Kennedy,et al.  Anatomic segmentation and volumetric calculations in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. , 1989, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[4]  M. LeMay,et al.  Abnormalities of the left temporal lobe and thought disorder in schizophrenia. A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  William M. Wells,et al.  Efficient Synthesis of Gaussian Filters by Cascaded Uniform Filters , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  K. K. Tan,et al.  The brain: integrated three-dimensional display of MR and PET images. , 1989, Radiology.

[7]  D. B. Davis,et al.  Sun Microsystems Inc. , 1993 .

[8]  W. Lorensen,et al.  Two algorithms for the three-dimensional reconstruction of tomograms. , 1988, Medical physics.

[9]  Andreas Pommert,et al.  Framework for the generation of 3-D anatomical atlases , 1992, Other Conferences.

[10]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  An automatic registration method for frameless stereotaxy, image guided surgery, and enhanced reality visualization , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Nonlinear anisotropic filtering of MRI data , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  B. Rosen,et al.  Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging. , 1991, Science.

[13]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Model-based 3-D segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions in dual-echo MRI data , 1992, Other Conferences.

[14]  R. Lufkin,et al.  Dynamic-range compression in surface-coil MRI. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  Stephen R. Aylward,et al.  Spatially invariant classification of tissues in MR images , 1994, Other Conferences.

[16]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[17]  Guido Gerig,et al.  Medical Imaging and Computer Vision: An Integrated Approach for Diagnosis and Planning , 1989, DAGM-Symposium.

[18]  B. Roy Frieden,et al.  Probability, Statistical Optics, And Data Testing , 1982 .

[19]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Correction of intensity variations in MR images for computer-aided tissue classification , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Routine quantitative analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid spaces with MR imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  A. Alavi,et al.  Analysis of brain and cerebrospinal fluid volumes with MR imaging: impact on PET data correction for atrophy. Part II. Aging and Alzheimer dementia. , 1991, Radiology.

[22]  R. Kikinis,et al.  Three-dimensional segmentation of MR images of the head using probability and connectivity. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[23]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[24]  R. L. Butterfield,et al.  Multispectral analysis of magnetic resonance images. , 1985, Radiology.

[25]  J. Hogg Magnetic resonance imaging. , 1994, Journal of the Royal Naval Medical Service.

[26]  G. Glover,et al.  Rapid in vivo proton shimming , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Tomas Lozano-Perez,et al.  Automatic : Registration for Multiple Sclerosis Change Detection , 2004 .

[28]  M W Vannier,et al.  Multispectral analysis of MR images of the breast. , 1987, Radiology.

[29]  K. Lim,et al.  Segmentation of MR Brain Images into Cerebrospinal Fluid Spaces, White and Gray Matter , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[30]  L O Hall,et al.  Review of MR image segmentation techniques using pattern recognition. , 1993, Medical physics.