Methods for incorporating patients' views in health care

This is the third of three articles on research into improving the quality of health care Efforts to improve health care will be wasted unless they reflect what patients want from the service. But to be sure that surveys of patients' views are valid and have an effect on care, the methods used must be evaluated rigorously Society now acknowledges the importance of the views of users in developing services, and the healthcare sector has used a range of methods to identify the views of patients and the public. Examples are questionnaires to assess patients' needs before a consultation with the clinician, shared decision making, focus groups with patients to include their views in clinical guidelines, and surveys among patients to provide feedback to care providers or the public. Such methods need to be examined in terms of validity, effectiveness, and implementation.1 We describe some of the important issues related to measuring patients' views and evaluating their use in improving health care. #### Summary points Patients can contribute to debates on health care by giving their preferences for care, evaluations of what occurred, or factual reports of care Measures of patients' views should be assessed for validity, preferably by rigorous qualitative studies Methods to include patients' views must be shown to affect the processes and outcomes of health care; possible negative consequences should also be considered The methods used to determine patients' views can be divided into three types: measures of preferences, evaluations by users, and reports of health care (box). The types of measure used will depend on what aspect of health care is being assessed, but all have limitations. One problem with assessing preferences is that patients' decisions about what is important in health care often reflect their individual experience rather than a general view. Interaction between patients in focus …

[1]  R L Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--I: Measurement strategies. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  M. Adams,et al.  Patients as Reliable Reporters of Medical Care Process: Recall of Ambulatory Encounter Events , 1992, Medical care.

[3]  Michel Wensing,et al.  Patient Priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison , 1999 .

[4]  D M Trandel-Korenchuk,et al.  Patient participation in decision making. , 1982, The Nurse practitioner.

[5]  R. Grol,et al.  Comparison of patients' preferences and evaluations regarding aspects of general practice care. , 2000, Family practice.

[6]  T V Perneger,et al.  Analysis of non-response bias in a mailed health survey. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[7]  R. Grol,et al.  Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis. , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[8]  R. Baker,et al.  Pragmatic model of patient satisfaction in general practice: progress towards a theory. , 1997, Quality in health care : QHC.

[9]  W. Carter,et al.  Patient requests and expectations. Definitions and clinical applications. , 1984, Medical care.

[10]  G. C. Pascoe,et al.  Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. , 1983, Evaluation and program planning.

[11]  M. Ryan Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[12]  K. Cook,et al.  A Trial for Comparing Methods for Eliciting Treatment Preferences From Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer: Results From the Initial Visit , 2000, Medical care.

[13]  Glyn Elwyn,et al.  Consumers’ views of quality in the consultation and their relevance to ‘shared decision‐making’ approaches , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[14]  B. Williams Patient satisfaction: a valid concept? , 1994, Social science & medicine.

[15]  B. Thompson Low back pain management in primary care , 2004 .

[16]  Penelope M. Mullen,et al.  Public involvement in health care priority setting: an overview of methods for eliciting values , 1999, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[17]  Robert M. O’Brien,et al.  Generalizability coefficients are reliability coefficients , 1995 .

[18]  H R Rubin,et al.  Can Patients Evaluate the Quality of Hospital Care? , 1990, Medical care review.

[19]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  J. Sitzia How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. , 1999, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[21]  M. Clarke,et al.  Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[22]  M. Wensing,et al.  Evidence-based patient empowerment , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[23]  H. Sixma,et al.  Quality of care from the perspective of elderly people: the QUOTE-elderly instrument. , 2000, Age and ageing.