Identification of surgeon–individual treatment profiles to support the provision of an optimum treatment service for cataract patients

One objective of ophthalmological departments is the optimization of patient treatment services. A strategy for optimization is the identification of individual potential for advanced training of surgeons based on their daily working results. The objective of this feasibility study was the presentation and evaluation of a strategy for the computation of surgeon–individual treatment profiles (SiTPs). We observed experienced surgeons during their standard daily performance of cataract procedures in the Ophthalmological Department of the University Medical Center Leipzig, Germany. One hundred five cases of cataract procedures were measured as Surgical Process Models (SPMs) with a detailed-to-the-second resolution. The procedures were performed by three different surgeons during their daily work. Subsequently, SiTPs were computed and analyzed from the SPMs as statistical ‘mean’ treatment strategies for each of the surgeons. The feasibility study demonstrated that it is possible to identify differences in surgeon–individual treatment profiles beyond the resolution of cut–suture times. Surgeon–individual workflows, activity frequencies and average performance durations of surgical activities during cataract procedures were analyzed. Highly significant (p < 0.001) workflow differences were found between the treatment profiles of the three surgeons. Conclusively, the generation of SiTPs is a convenient strategy to identify surgeon–individual training potentials in cataract surgery. Concrete recommendations for further education can be derived from the profiles.

[1]  B. Little,et al.  Use of low-cost video recording device in reflective practice in cataract surgery. , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  T. Oetting,et al.  Impact of a structured surgical curriculum on ophthalmic resident cataract surgery complication rates , 2009, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  C. Hashimoto,et al.  Teaching continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis using a postmortem pig eye with simulated cataract , 2001, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[4]  G. Binenbaum,et al.  Development and face and content validity of an eye surgical skills assessment test for ophthalmology residents. , 2006, Ophthalmology.

[5]  Thomas Neumuth,et al.  Assessment of technical needs for surgical equipment by surgical process models , 2009, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[6]  Gero Strauß,et al.  Research Paper: Validation of Knowledge Acquisition for Surgical Process Models , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  V. Rajaratnam,et al.  Surgical process re-engineering: carpal tunnel decompression--a model. , 2004, Hand surgery : an international journal devoted to hand and upper limb surgery and related research : journal of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand.

[8]  P S White,et al.  Using human reliability analysis to detect surgical error in endoscopic DCR surgery. , 2003, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[9]  A. Ayanniyi,et al.  Trainee ophthalmologists' opinions on ways to improve cataract surgical rate. , 2009, Annals of African medicine.

[10]  L. MacKenzie,et al.  Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic surgery: a human factors approach to investigating the operating room environment , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[11]  T. Neumuth,et al.  Structured recording of intraoperative surgical workflows , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  Heinz Wörn,et al.  Operation planning of robot supported surgical interventions , 2000, Proceedings. 2000 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2000) (Cat. No.00CH37113).

[13]  V. Jhanji,et al.  Assessment of perceived difficulties by residents in performing routine steps in phacoemulsification surgery and in managing complications. , 2009, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[14]  A. K. Chung,et al.  Objective structured assessment of cataract surgical skill. , 2007, Archives of ophthalmology.

[15]  Anthony Arnold,et al.  Evaluation of the virtual mentor cataract training program. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[16]  P. Jannin,et al.  Model of Surgical Procedures for Multimodal Image-Guided Neurosurgery , 2003, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[17]  H. U. Lemke,et al.  Bestimmung der Effizienz von intraoperativer Technologie , 2006, HNO.

[18]  P. McDonnell,et al.  Higher surgical training in ophthalmology: trends in cumulative surgical experience 1993–2008 , 2010, Eye.

[19]  J Meixensberger,et al.  [Workflow analysis to assess the efficiency of intraoperative technology using the example of functional endoscopic sinus surgery]. , 2006, HNO.

[20]  Pierre Jannin,et al.  Surgical models for computer-assisted neurosurgery , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  Bonnie An Henderson,et al.  Objective Assessment of Skills in Intraocular Surgery (OASIS). , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[22]  S. Skalicky,et al.  The grape: an appropriate model for continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis. , 2008, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[23]  Thomas Neumuth,et al.  Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[24]  M. Frecker,et al.  Sequence and task analysis of instrument use in common laparoscopic procedures , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[25]  G. Binenbaum,et al.  Microsurgical lab testing is a reliable method for assessing ophthalmology residents’ surgical skills , 2007, British Journal of Ophthalmology.