Legislative Change Management with Akoma-Ntoso

The dynamicity of the law enables legislative texts to adapt to changes in society, as well as to correct iniquities and to effectively set out rights and duties. In the Web 2.0 era, an overabundance of obsolete legal information can be disorienting, not only for the citizen but also for enterprises and for government agencies tasked with making enforceable decisions. The goal of legal-information systems, legal databanks, and recently the collections of legal documents on the Web is thus to provide pertinent and updated legal information to legal experts and citizens alike, this in a dynamic scenario and possibly with semantic annotation explaining outcomes. In this chapter we explain how Akoma Ntoso provides an exhaustive mechanism for managing the changes a legal system undergoes over time and in multiple scenarios. To this end, we start out by looking at the different kinds of changes involved and defining them. We analyse the components of change in depth and provide a classification for qualifying the provisions found in a legal text. Then we introduce some methods for managing the different types of change identified. And finally, we explain how such changes are managed in Akoma Ntoso.

[1]  Rinke Hoekstra,et al.  MetaVex: Regulation Drafting Meets the Semantic Web , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[2]  Radboud Winkels,et al.  A next step towards automated modelling of sources of law , 2009, ICAIL.

[3]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  Towards a country-independent data format: the Akoma Ntoso experience , 2007 .

[4]  Alessandro Mazzei,et al.  NLP-based extraction of modificatory provisions semantics , 2009, ICAIL.

[5]  Simonetta Montemagni,et al.  Semantic Processing of Legal Texts: Where the Language of Law Meets the Law of Language , 2010, Semantic Processing of Legal Texts.

[6]  Angelo Di Iorio,et al.  Managing semantics in XML vocabularies: an experience in the legal and legislative domain , 2010 .

[7]  Fabio Vitali,et al.  MetaLex XML and the Legal Knowledge Interchange Format , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[8]  Guido Governatori,et al.  Changing legal systems: legal abrogations and annulments in Defeasible Logic , 2010, Log. J. IGPL.

[9]  Angelo Di Iorio,et al.  A Natural and Multi-layered Approach to Detect Changes in Tree-Based Textual Documents , 2009, ICEIS.

[10]  Monica Palmirani,et al.  Legal Change Management with a Native XML Repository , 2009, JURIX.

[11]  Pompeu Casanovas,et al.  Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies , 2008, Computable Models of the Law, Languages, Dialogues, Games, Ontologies.

[12]  Giuseppe Contissa,et al.  Fill the Gap in the Legal Knowledge Modelling , 2009, RuleML.

[13]  Graham Greenleaf Jon Bing and the History of Computerised Legal Research - Some Missing Links , 2004 .

[14]  Timothy Arnold-Moore,et al.  Connected to the Law: Tasmanian Legislation Using EnAct , 2000, J. Inf. Law Technol..

[15]  Aldous Huxley,et al.  Looking Back at The Future , 2008 .

[16]  Simonetta Montemagni,et al.  NLP-based metadata extraction for legal text consolidation , 2009, ICAIL.

[17]  Timothy Arnold-Moore Automatically processing amendments to legislation , 1995, ICAIL '95.

[18]  Patrick Brézillon,et al.  Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , 1999 .

[19]  Monica Palmirani Time Model in Normative Information Systems , 2005 .