Evaluation of performance indicators applied to a material recovery facility fed by mixed packaging waste.

Most of the integrated systems for municipal solid waste management aim to increase the recycling of secondary materials by means of physical processes including sorting, shredding and reprocessing. Several restrictions prevent from reaching a very high material recycling efficiency: the variability of the composition of new-marketed materials used for packaging production and its shape and complexity are critical issues. The packaging goods are in fact made of different materials (aluminium, polymers, paper, etc.), possibly assembled, having different shape (flat, cylindrical, one-dimensional, etc.), density, colours, optical properties and so on. These aspects limit the effectiveness and efficiency of the sorting and reprocessing plants. The scope of this study was to evaluate the performance of a large scale Material Recovery Facility (MRF) by utilizing data collected during a long period of monitoring. The database resulted from the measured data has been organized in four sections: (1) data related to the amount and type of inlet waste; (2) amount and composition of output products and waste; (3) operating data (such as worked hours for shift, planned and unscheduled maintenance time, setting parameters of the equipment, and energy consumption for shift); (4) economic data (value of each product, disposal price for the produced waste, penalty for non-compliance of products and waste, etc.). A part of this database has been utilized to build an executive dashboard composed by a set of performance indicators suitable to measure the effectiveness and the efficiency of the MRF operations. The dashboard revealed itself as a powerful tool to support managers and engineers in their decisions in respect to the market demand or compliance regulation variation as well as in the designing of the lay-out improvements. The results indicated that the 40% of the input waste was recovered as valuable products and that a large part of these (88%) complied with the standards of the recycling companies. The evaluation of the indicators led to the decision to modify the layout to improve the interception of some polymers for which the performance indicators were poor. In particular, two additional optical sorters have to be inserted to increase the yield indicator and to the overall performance of the facility. Definitely, the results of the work allowed to: increase the yield and purity of products' flows; ensure the compliance of waste flows; increase the workability.

[1]  A Feil,et al.  Technical assessment of processing plants as exemplified by the sorting of beverage cartons from lightweight packaging wastes. , 2016, Waste management.

[2]  Per Stromberg,et al.  Market imperfections in recycling markets: conceptual issues and empirical study of price volatility in plastics , 2004 .

[3]  Raffaele Cremiato,et al.  Evaluation of municipal solid waste management performance by material flow analysis: Theoretical approach and case study , 2015, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[4]  Isaac Muise,et al.  Attitudes to the recovery and recycling of agricultural plastics waste: A case study of Nova Scotia, Canada , 2016 .

[5]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Techno-economic assessment of central sorting at material recovery facilities: the case of lightweight packaging waste , 2016 .

[6]  J. Baeyens,et al.  Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): a review. , 2009, Waste management.

[7]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration , 2009 .

[8]  P. M Subramanian,et al.  Plastics recycling and waste management in the US , 2000 .

[9]  Marta Cabral,et al.  Packaging waste recycling in Europe: is the industry paying for it? , 2014, Waste management.

[10]  O Schlosser,et al.  Extension of the sorting instructions for household plastic packaging and changes in exposure to bioaerosols at materials recovery facilities. , 2015, Waste management.

[11]  Henrik Wenzel,et al.  Central sorting and recovery of MSW recyclable materials: A review of technological state-of-the-art, cases, practice and implications for materials recycling. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  Gorka Bueno,et al.  Comparative LCA of two approaches with different emphasis on energy or material recovery for a municipal solid waste management system in Gipuzkoa , 2015 .