The effect of postmortem time and freezer storage on the mechanical properties of skeletal muscle

Data is currently lacking to define the state of skeletal muscle properties within the cadaver. This study sought to define changes in the postmortem properties of skeletal muscle as a function of mechanical loading and freezer storage. The tibialis anterior of the New Zealand White rabbit was chosen for study. Modulus and no-load strain were found to vary greatly from live after 8 hours postmortem. Following the dynamic changes that occur at the onset and during rigor mortis, a semi-stable region of postmortem, post-rigor properties occurred between 36 to 72 hours postmortem. A freeze-thaw process was not found to have a significant effect on the post-rigor response. The first loading cycle response of post-rigor muscle was unrepeatable but stiffer than live passive muscle. After preconditioning, the post-rigor muscle response was repeatable but significantly less stiff than live passive muscle due to an increase in no-load strain. Failure properties of postmortem muscle were found to be significantly different than live passive muscle with significant decreases in failure stress (61%) and energy (81%), while failure strain was unchanged. Results suggest that the post-rigor response of cadaver muscle is unaffected by freezing but sensitive to even a few cycles of mechanical loading.

[1]  J Baulieux,et al.  Mechanical characteristics of fresh and frozen human descending thoracic aorta. , 1996, The Journal of surgical research.

[2]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Investigation of the Kinematics and Kinetics of Whiplash , 1967 .

[3]  A Viidik,et al.  Freezing for postmortal storage influences the biomechanical properties of linear skin wounds. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  G. E. Goslow,et al.  The cat step cycle: Hind limb joint angles and muscle lengths during unrestrained locomotion , 1973, Journal of morphology.

[5]  A. Quali,et al.  Proteolytic and physicocohemical mechanisms involved in meat texture development , 1992 .

[6]  E Y Chao,et al.  Effects of freeze/thaw conditioning on the tensile properties and failure mode of bone‐muscle‐bone units: A biomechanical and histological study in dogs , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[7]  S. McGill,et al.  Frozen storage increases the ultimate compressive load of porcine vertebrae , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[8]  A. Magid,et al.  Myofibrils bear most of the resting tension in frog skeletal muscle. , 1985, Science.

[9]  N Yoganandan,et al.  Human head-neck biomechanics under axial tension. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Effects of freezing and freeze‐drying on the biomechanical properties of rat bone , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  Bechtold Je,et al.  Biomechanical properties of canine corticocancellous bone frozen in normal saline solution. , 1995 .

[12]  R L Lieber,et al.  Skeletal muscle architecture of the rabbit hindlimb: Functional implications of muscle design , 1989, Journal of morphology.

[13]  L. M. Patrick,et al.  Strength and response of the human neck , 1971 .

[14]  J. Rodrigo,et al.  An in vitro study of the structural properties of deep-frozen versus freeze-dried, ethylene oxide-sterilized canine anterior cruciate ligament bone-ligament-bone preparations. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  John W. Melvin,et al.  Head impact response comparisons of human surrogates , 1979 .

[16]  A. Sances,et al.  Dynamic Response of Human Cervical Spine Ligaments , 1989, Spine.

[17]  S. Woo,et al.  Effects of postmortem storage by freezing on ligament tensile behavior. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  D. E. Brooks,et al.  Effects of postmortem freezing on tensile failure properties of rabbit extensor digitorum longus muscle tendon complex , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[19]  B S Myers,et al.  Experimental Impact Injury to the Cervical Spine: Relating Motion of the Head and the Mechanism of Injury* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[20]  C B Frank,et al.  The effect of cryopreservation on the biomechanical behavior of bovine articular cartilage , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[21]  J C Goh,et al.  Effect of preservation medium on the mechanical properties of cat bones. , 1989, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[22]  Dimitrios Kallieris,et al.  Comparison of Human Volunteer and Cadaver Head-Neck Response in Frontal Flexion , 1987 .

[23]  J E Smeathers,et al.  Dynamic compressive properties of human lumbar intervertebral joints: a comparison between fresh and thawed specimens. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  James H. McElhaney,et al.  Cervical Spine Compression Responses , 1983 .

[25]  W C Hayes,et al.  Effects of selected thermal variables on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[26]  E. R. Fitzgerald,et al.  Dynamic mechanical measurements during the life to death transition in animal tissues. , 1975, Biorheology.

[27]  D. E. Goll,et al.  Is Z-disk degradation responsible for postmortem tenderization? , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[28]  M. Panjabi,et al.  Biomechanical time‐tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens , 1985, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[29]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Cervical spine mechanics as a function of transection of components. , 1975, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  B S Myers,et al.  The viscoelastic responses of the human cervical spine in torsion: experimental limitations of quasi-linear theory, and a method for reducing these effects. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  F. Linde,et al.  The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  T Merrill,et al.  Three-dimensional response of a lumped parameter head-neck model due to impact and impulsive loading. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  I. S. Young,et al.  Mechanical properties of tendons: changes with sterilization and preservation. , 1996, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[34]  Narayan Yoganandan,et al.  Injury biomechanics of the human cervical column. , 1990 .

[35]  Claude Tarriere,et al.  Head and Neck Responses under High G-Level Lateral Deceleration , 1987 .

[36]  Roger W. Nightingale,et al.  The influence of end condition on human cervical spine injury mechanisms , 1991 .

[37]  M. Koohmaraie,et al.  Effect of pH, temperature, and inhibitors on autolysis and catalytic activity of bovine skeletal muscle mu-calpain. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[38]  K. Takahashi,et al.  Non-enzymatic weakening of myofibrillar structures during conditioning of meat: calcium ions at 0.1 mM and their effect on meat tenderization. , 1992, Biochimie.

[39]  M. Koohmaraie,et al.  The role of Ca(2+)-dependent proteases (calpains) in post mortem proteolysis and meat tenderness. , 1992, Biochimie.

[40]  E. Sedlin,et al.  A rheologic model for cortical bone. A study of the physical properties of human femoral samples. , 1965, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[41]  C F Abrams,et al.  Effects of freezing on mechanical properties of rat skin. , 1992, American journal of veterinary research.

[42]  F. Zajac.  Muscle and tendon: properties, models, scaling, and application to biomechanics and motor control. , 1989, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[43]  G. Demartino,et al.  Calcium-activated neutral protease (calpain) system: structure, function, and regulation. , 1991, Physiological reviews.

[44]  A. Ouali,et al.  An introduction to the workshop , 1992 .