Word frequency in fast priming: Evidence for immediate cognitive control of eye movements during reading

Numerous studies have demonstrated effects of word frequency on eye movements during reading, but the precise timing of this influence has remained unclear. The fast priming paradigm was previously used to study influences of related versus unrelated primes on the target word. Here, we use this procedure to investigate whether the frequency of the prime word has a direct influence on eye movements during reading when the prime–target relation is not manipulated. We found that with average prime intervals of 32 ms readers made longer single fixation durations on the target word in the low than in the high frequency prime condition. Distributional analyses demonstrated that the effect of prime frequency on single fixation durations occurred very early, supporting theories of immediate cognitive control of eye movements. Finding prime frequency effects only 207 ms after visibility of the prime and for prime durations of 32 ms yields new time constraints for cognitive processes controlling eye movements during reading. Our variant of the fast priming paradigm provides a new approach to test early influences of word processing on eye movement control during reading.

[1]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  K. Rayner.  The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations , 2012, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  G. McConkie,et al.  Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times , 2001, Vision Research.

[5]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[6]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  A Theoretical Analysis of the Perceptual Span based on SWIFT Simulations of the n + 2 Boundary Paradigm , 2014, Visual cognition.

[7]  Andreas A. Ioannides,et al.  Precise mapping of early visual responses in space and time , 2007, NeuroImage.

[8]  Simon P. Liversedge,et al.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: The importance of the word to the right of fixation , 2006, Vision Research.

[9]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Saccadic Inhibition in Voluntary and Reflexive Saccades , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. , 1998, Psychological review.

[11]  Distributional Effects , 2003 .

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[13]  S. Lupker,et al.  Testing for lexical competition during reading: fast priming with orthographic neighbors. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Albrecht W. Inhoff,et al.  Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose , 1984 .

[15]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing , 2002, Vision Research.

[17]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Evidence for delayed parafoveal-on-foveal effects from word n+2 in reading. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  ICAT: a computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Establishing a time‐line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event‐related potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[20]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Experimental Effects and Individual Differences in Linear Mixed Models: Estimating the Relationship between Spatial, Object, and Attraction Effects in Visual Attention , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[21]  R. Solomon,et al.  Visual duration threshold as a function of word-probability. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  Johan Mårtensson,et al.  Do Intensive Studies of a Foreign Language Improve Associative Memory Performance? , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[23]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[24]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[25]  K. Rayner,et al.  Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Synchronizing timelines: Relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading , 2007, Brain Research.

[27]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Reading Disappearing Text , 2003, Psychological science.

[28]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading: Serial-attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects , 2014 .

[29]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements and display change detection during reading. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  R. Reilly,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: A simulation of some word-targeting strategies , 1998, Vision Research.

[31]  Steven Frisson,et al.  Phonological and Orthographic Overlap Effects in Fast and Masked Priming , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  S. Sereno.  Resolution of lexical ambiguity: evidence from an eye movement priming paradigm. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  John Sibert,et al.  AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear models , 2012, Optim. Methods Softw..

[34]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  Neurophysiological constraints on the eye-mind link , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[35]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  Robert W. Kentridge,et al.  Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading? , 2004, Vision Research.

[37]  A. Jacobs,et al.  Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  R C JOHNSON,et al.  Word values, word frequency, and visual duration thresholds. , 1960, Psychological review.

[39]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Latency of sequential eye movements: implications for reading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Kevin O’Regan,et al.  Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance The Distribution of Fixation Durations During Reading : Effects of Stimulus Quality , 2011 .

[42]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[43]  K. Rayner.  The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[44]  Eyal M Reingold,et al.  Saccadic inhibition in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Activation of phonological codes during eye fixations in reading. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[46]  F. C. Volkmann,et al.  Time course of visual inhibition during voluntary saccades. , 1968, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[47]  K. Rayner,et al.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  Shun-Nan Yang,et al.  An oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: The competition/interaction model , 2006, Cognitive Systems Research.

[49]  J Jonides,et al.  Programming saccadic eye movements. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Phonological Codes Are Automatically Activated During Reading: Evidence From an Eye Movement Priming Paradigm , 1995 .

[51]  D. Barr,et al.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. , 2013, Journal of memory and language.

[52]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[53]  J. O'Regan.  Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[54]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  G. McConkie,et al.  The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading , 1975 .

[56]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The processing of consonants and vowels in reading: Evidence from the fast priming paradigm , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  Adrian Staub,et al.  The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[58]  Sarah J. White,et al.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.

[60]  A Pollatsek,et al.  The time course of phonological, semantic, and orthographic coding in reading: Evidence from the fast-priming technique , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  Ralf Engbert,et al.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model , 2012, Visual cognition.

[62]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movement Control during Reading: Evidence for Direct Control , 1981, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[63]  Reinhold Kliegl,et al.  Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[64]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in nonreading tasks: a unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link. , 2012, Psychological review.