A statistical approach for detecting common features

BACKGROUND With increasing numbers of datasets in neuroimaging studies, it has become an important task to pool information, in order to increase the statistical power of tests and for cross validation. However, no robust global approach unambiguously identifies the common biological abnormalities in, for example, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in a number of mental disorders, where there are multiple datasets/attributes. Here we propose a novel and efficient statistical approach to this problem that finds common features in multiple datasets. NEW METHOD By collecting the statistics of each dataset into a vector, our method uses a 'multi-dimensional local false discovery' rate to pool information and make full use of the joint distribution of datasets. RESULTS We have tested our approach extensively on both simulated and clinical datasets. By conducting simulation studies, we find that our approach has a higher statistical power than existing approaches, especially on correlated datasets. Employing our approach on clinical data yields findings that are consistent with the existing literature. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS Conventional methods cannot determine the false discovery rate underlying multiple datasets/attributes. Our approach can effectively handle these datasets. It has a solid Bayesian interpretation, and a higher power than other approaches in numerical simulations. This can be explained by the incorporation of correlations, between different attributes, into the new method. CONCLUSIONS In this work, we present a natural, novel and powerful statistical approach to tackle situations involving multiple datasets or attributes. This new method has significant advantages over existing approaches and wide applications.

[1]  E. Suchman,et al.  The American soldier: Adjustment during army life. (Studies in social psychology in World War II), Vol. 1 , 1949 .

[2]  M. Phillips,et al.  Identifying functional neuroimaging biomarkers of bipolar disorder: toward DSM-V. , 2007, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[3]  Isaac Dialsingh,et al.  Large-scale inference: empirical Bayes methods for estimation, testing, and prediction , 2012 .

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[5]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  A. Meyer-Lindenberg,et al.  Psychopathology and the Human Connectome: Toward a Transdiagnostic Model of Risk For Mental Illness , 2012, Neuron.

[7]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Auditory hallucinations and the temporal cortical response to speech in schizophrenia: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1997, The American journal of psychiatry.

[8]  P. Hall,et al.  Robustness of multiple testing procedures against dependence , 2009, 0903.0464.

[9]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review , 2003, Statistical methods in medical research.

[10]  Govind S. Mudholkar,et al.  The Logit Statistic for Combining Probabilities - An Overview , 1977 .

[11]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Conjunction group analysis: An alternative to mixed/random effect analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  Clive E Adams,et al.  Schizophrenia. Full National Clinical Guideline on Core Interventions in Primary and Secondary Care National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health , 2004 .

[13]  B. Sinha,et al.  Statistical Meta-Analysis with Applications , 2008 .

[14]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[15]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  Journal of the American Statistical Association Estimating False Discovery Proportion under Arbitrary Covariance Dependence Estimating False Discovery Proportion under Arbitrary Covariance Dependence , 2022 .

[16]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2009 .

[17]  Daniel B. Rowe,et al.  An evaluation of thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[18]  Tyrone D. Cannon,et al.  Common genetic determinants of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Swedish families: a population-based study , 2009, The Lancet.

[19]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 1989 .

[20]  Daniel R. Weinberger,et al.  Schizophrenia and the frontal lobe , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[21]  Weiss,et al.  Cerebral metabolic correlates as potential predictors of response to anterior cingulotomy for treatment of major depression. , 2003, Journal of neurosurgery.

[22]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  E G Jones,et al.  Cortical development and thalamic pathology in schizophrenia. , 1997, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[24]  Rongjun Yu,et al.  Key functional circuitry altered in schizophrenia involves parietal regions associated with sense of self , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[25]  Karuturi R. Krishna Murthy,et al.  Bias in the estimation of false discovery rate in microarray studies , 2005, Bioinform..

[26]  S. Kay,et al.  The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. , 1987, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[27]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[28]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[29]  G. Glover,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Major Depression: Abnormally Increased Contributions from Subgenual Cingulate Cortex and Thalamus , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[30]  R. Fisher FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF THE VALUES OF THE CORRELATION COEFFIENTS IN SAMPLES FROM AN INDEFINITELY LARGE POPU;ATION , 1915 .

[31]  David Adam,et al.  Mental health: On the spectrum , 2013, Nature.

[32]  M. Daly,et al.  Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis , 2013, The Lancet.

[33]  Beatriz Luna,et al.  Combining Brains: A Survey of Methods for Statistical Pooling of Information , 2002, NeuroImage.

[34]  E G Jones,et al.  Subnucleus-specific loss of neurons in medial thalamus of schizophrenics. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  A. Kring,et al.  Anhedonia in schizophrenia: a review of assessment strategies. , 2006, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[36]  R. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers. , 1955 .

[37]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  John D. Storey,et al.  Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment , 2001 .

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Cognitive Conjunction: A New Approach to Brain Activation Experiments , 1997, NeuroImage.

[40]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Empirical bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarrays , 2002, Genetic epidemiology.

[41]  M. Kendall Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1937, Nature.

[42]  M. LeMay,et al.  Abnormalities of the left temporal lobe and thought disorder in schizophrenia. A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[43]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[44]  K. Kendrick,et al.  Depression uncouples brain hate circuit , 2011, Molecular Psychiatry.

[45]  Nicole A Lazar,et al.  Assessing the sensitivity of fMRI group maps , 2004, NeuroImage.

[46]  Yudi Pawitan,et al.  Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies , 2006, Bioinform..

[47]  P. Cowen,et al.  Neural representation of reward in recovered depressed patients , 2009, Psychopharmacology.