Cross‐validation‐based kernel support selection for improved GRAPPA reconstruction

The extended version of the generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) technique incorporates multiple lines and multiple columns of measured k‐space data to estimate missing data. For a given accelerated dataset, the selection of the measured data points for fitting a missing datum (i.e., the kernel support) that provides optimal reconstruction depends on coil array configuration, noise level in the acquired data, imaging configuration, and number and position of autocalibrating signal lines. In this work, cross‐validation is used to select the kernel support that best balances the conflicting demands of fit accuracy and stability in GRAPPA reconstruction. The result is an optimized tradeoff between artifacts and noise. As demonstrated with experimental data, the method improves image reconstruction with GRAPPA. Because the method is simple and applied in postprocessing, it can be used with GRAPPA routinely. Magn Reson Med 59:819–825, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  P M Jakob,et al.  VD‐AUTO‐SMASH imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  C A McKenzie,et al.  Coil‐by‐coil image reconstruction with SMASH , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  W. Manning,et al.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): Fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Jiongjiong Wang,et al.  Improved data reconstruction method for GRAPPA , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  A tour of accelerated parallel MR imaging from a linear systems perspective , 2005 .

[7]  Jing Yuan,et al.  Tailored utilization of acquired k-space points for GRAPPA reconstruction. , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[8]  Mark Bydder,et al.  Generalized SMASH imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  D. Sodickson Tailored SMASH image reconstructions for robust in vivo parallel MR imaging , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  P. Bottomley,et al.  An analytical SMASH procedure (ASP) for sensitivity‐encoded MRI , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Robert A. Lordo,et al.  Learning from Data: Concepts, Theory, and Methods , 2001, Technometrics.

[12]  M. Stone Cross‐Validatory Choice and Assessment of Statistical Predictions , 1976 .

[13]  Daniel K Sodickson,et al.  3Parallel magnetic resonance imaging with adaptive radius in k‐space (PARS): Constrained image reconstruction using k‐space locality in radiofrequency coil encoded data , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Peter M. Jakob,et al.  AUTO-SMASH: A self-calibrating technique for SMASH imaging , 1998, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[15]  H. Akaike Statistical predictor identification , 1970 .