Getting into the mind of an "in-auction" fraud perpetrator

Online auctions are a popular means for exchanging items over the Internet. However, participants can behave in an undesirable manner during an auction in an attempt to gain an unfair advantage at the expense of rivals. Such conduct is a problem as it results in market failure, thereby inhibiting the usefulness of online auctions as an exchange medium. This paper presents a taxonomy of the fraudulent behaviour that can occur while an online auction is in-progress. We examine the perpetrator’s mindset for the following dubious practices: shill bidding, bid sniping, bid shielding, and bid siphoning. We propose the characteristics of such behaviour, the strategies employed, identify the expected pay-off for the perpetrator, and present a novel “Victim Sphere” that outlines who is negatively affected by bad behaviour. We also briefly outline the current state of prevention and detection mechanisms—identifying gaps and open questions where applicable. We contrast the types of undesirable and fraudulent behaviour, describe how they are interrelated, and discuss the challenges researchers face when devising and testing fraud detection/prevention techniques for in-auction fraud. This paper serves as a platform to raise research interest in tackling the remaining challenges for combating in-auction fraud.

[1]  Shi-Jen Lin,et al.  Fuzzy rule optimization for online auction frauds detection based on genetic algorithm , 2013, Electronic Commerce Research.

[2]  Matthew K. Franklin,et al.  The Design and Implementation of a Secure Auction Service , 1996, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[3]  Jie Lu,et al.  A Proficient and Dynamic Bidding Agent for Online Auctions , 2012, ADMI.

[4]  Ladislav Beránek,et al.  The Use of Contextual Information to Detection of Fraud on Online Auctions , 2013 .

[5]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  An Adaptive Shill Bidding Agent , 2007, ICE-B.

[6]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  The effects of shilling on final bid prices in online auctions , 2005, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[8]  Haiping Xu,et al.  Model checking bidding behaviors in internet concurrent auctions , 2007, Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng..

[9]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Running up the bid: detecting, predicting, and preventing reserve price shilling in online auctions , 2003, ICEC '03.

[10]  Paul F. Syverson,et al.  Fair On-Line Auctions without Special Trusted Parties , 1999, Financial Cryptography.

[11]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A Fuzzy-Logic Based Bidding Strategy for Autonomous Agents in Continuous Double Auctions , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[12]  Haiping Xu,et al.  Inference of Online Auction Shills Using Dempster-Shafer Theory , 2009, 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[13]  Abdolkarim Sadrieh,et al.  Sudden Termination Auctions - An Experimental Study , 2012 .

[14]  Shi-Jen Lin,et al.  Combining ranking concept and social network analysis to detect collusive groups in online auctions , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[15]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  Disarming the bid sniper , 2011 .

[16]  Gillian Dobbie,et al.  Evaluating Fraud Detection Algorithms Using an Auction Data Generator , 2012, 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[17]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  A Software Tool for Collecting Data from Online Auctions , 2009, 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations.

[18]  J. Snyder Online Auction Fraud: Are the Auction Houses Doing All They Should or Could to Stop Online Fraud? , 2000 .

[19]  Haiping Xu,et al.  Combating online in-auction fraud: Clues, techniques and challenges , 2009, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[20]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  Investigating Shill Bidding Behaviour Involving Colluding Bidders , 2007, J. Comput..

[21]  Gillian Dobbie,et al.  Detecting online auction shilling frauds using supervised learning , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[23]  Haiping Xu,et al.  A Multi-State Bayesian Network for Shill Verification in Online Auctions , 2010, SEKE.

[24]  Ian M. Atkinson,et al.  Targeting the Strategies of a Bid Sniper , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Dibyen Majumdar,et al.  Price comparison: A reliable approach to identifying shill bidding in online auctions? , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[26]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  A Simple Shill Bidding Agent , 2007, Fourth International Conference on Information Technology (ITNG'07).

[27]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Designing Mechanisms for E-Commerce Security: An Example from Sealed-Bid Auctions , 2001, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[28]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Shill bidding in multi-round online auctions , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[29]  Jeffrey C. Ely,et al.  Sniping and Squatting in Auction Markets , 2009 .

[30]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  An Anonymous and Secure Continuous Double Auction Scheme , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[31]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  A typology of complaints about eBay sellers , 2008, CACM.