Determining the price for pharmaceuticals in Germany: comparing a shortcut for IQWiG's efficiency frontier method with the price set by the manufacturer for ticagrelor

Under the recently enacted pharmaceutical price and reimbursement regulation in Germany, manufacturers and payers negotiate an appropriate reimbursement price for new products. If one of the parties involved wishes so, a formal evaluation of costs and benefits will be conducted by the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). IQWiG makes recommendations for a reimbursement price based on the ‘efficiency frontier’ in a therapeutic area. The analysis requires, when applicable, to calculate savings in other areas of the healthcare system (cost offsets) and healthcare costs during the years of life gained (i.e., downstream costs). A recent paper described the conditions under which calculation of downstream costs is not required. The purpose of this study is to use the drug ticagrelor as an example to demonstrate this shortcut for the efficiency frontier method. The analysis shows that applying the IQWiG approach would result in substantial savings.

[1]  Anthony J. Culyer,et al.  Cost-effectiveness Analysis Registry , 2014 .

[2]  A. Gandjour Presenting Germany’s drug pricing rule as a cost-per-QALY rule , 2011, Health Care Management Science.

[3]  A. Gafni,et al.  The German method for setting ceiling prices for drugs: in some cases less data are required , 2011, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[4]  V. Serebruany Viewpoint: Paradoxical excess mortality in the PLATO trial should be independently verified , 2011, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[5]  A. Gandjour Germany’s decision rule for setting ceiling prices of drugs , 2011, Applied health economics and health policy.

[6]  Claes Held,et al.  Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  A. Gafni,et al.  Changing the problem to fit the solution: Johannesson and Weinstein's (mis) application of economics to real world problems. , 1993, Journal of health economics.

[9]  L Goldman,et al.  Stability of Time-tradeoff Utilities in Survivors of Myocardial Infarction , 1993, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[10]  A Gafni,et al.  Cost effectiveness/utility analyses. Do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be? , 1992, Journal of health economics.

[11]  Richard J. Zeckhauser,et al.  Critical ratios and efficient allocation , 1973 .

[12]  A. Gandjour Reference Pricing and Price Negotiations for Innovative New Drugs , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[13]  K. Günther Identifikation von Risikogruppen für myokardinfarktbedingte Letalität und nicht-leitliniengerechte Versorgung unter Patienten mit Nicht-ST-Streckenhebungs-Myokardinfarkt (NSTEMI) oder ST-Streckenhebungs-Myokardinfarkt (STEMI) in Bremen , 2010 .