Specification of cell fate along the proximal-distal axis in the developing chick limb bud

Pattern formation along the proximal-distal (PD) axis in the developing limb bud serves as a good model for learning how cell fate and regionalization of domains, which are essential processes in morphogenesis during development, are specified by positional information. In the present study, detailed fate maps for the limb bud of the chick embryo were constructed in order to gain insights into how cell fate for future structures along the PD axis is specified and subdivided. Our fate map revealed that there is a large overlap between the prospective autopod and zeugopod in the distal limb bud at an early stage (stage 19), whereas a limb bud at this stage has already regionalized the proximal compartments for the prospective stylopod and zeugopod. A clearer boundary of cell fate specifying the prospective autopod and zeugopod could be seen at stage 23, but cell mixing was still detectable inside the prospective autopod region at this stage. Detailed analysis of HOXA11 AND HOXA13 expression at single cell resolution suggested that the cell mixing is not due to separation of some different cell populations existing in a mosaic. Our findings suggest that a mixable unregionalized cell population is maintained in the distal area of the limb bud, while the proximal region starts to be regionalized at the early stage of limb development.

[1]  J. W. Saunders.  Is the Progress Zone Model a Victim of Progress? , 2002, Cell.

[2]  L. Wolpert,et al.  Morphogenesis of the vertebrate limb. , 1975, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[3]  J. W. Saunders.  The proximo-distal sequence of origin of the parts of the chick wing and the role of the ectoderm. , 1948, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[4]  C. Tickle,et al.  Negative Feedback Regulation of FGF Signaling Levels by Pyst1/MKP3 in Chick Embryos , 2003, Current Biology.

[5]  D. Summerbell.  A quantitative analysis of the effect of excision of the AER from the chick limb-bud. , 1974, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[6]  T. J. Horder,et al.  The fate map of the chick forelimb-bud and its bearing on hypothesized developmental control mechanisms , 2004, Anatomy and Embryology.

[7]  A. Kuroiwa,et al.  Distinct signaling molecules control Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 expression in the muscle precursor and mesenchyme of the chick limb bud. , 1999, Development.

[8]  J H Lewis,et al.  Fate maps and the pattern of cell division: a calculation for the chick wing-bud. , 1975, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[9]  J. Lewis,et al.  Time, place and positional value in the chick limb-bud. , 1975, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[10]  K. Muneoka,et al.  Cell migration and chick limb development: chemotactic action of FGF-4 and the AER. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[11]  A. Kuroiwa,et al.  Transition of Hox expression during limb cartilage development , 2002, Mechanisms of Development.

[12]  D. Summerbell.  A descriptive study of the rate of elongation and differentiation of the skeleton of the developing chick wing. , 1976, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[13]  Clifford J. Tabin,et al.  A re-examination of proximodistal patterning during vertebrate limb development , 2002, Nature.

[14]  Viktor Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo , 1992, Journal of morphology.

[15]  Lewis Wolpert.  Limb Patterning: Reports of Model's Death Exaggerated , 2002, Current Biology.

[16]  L. Wolpert,et al.  The progress zone — alive or dead? , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[17]  J. Rossant,et al.  Spatial and temporal patterns of ERK signaling during mouse embryogenesis , 2003, Development.

[18]  L Wolpert,et al.  Cell fate in the chick limb bud and relationship to gene expression. , 1997, Development.

[19]  N. Hacohen,et al.  Vertebrate Sprouty genes are induced by FGF signaling and can cause chondrodysplasia when overexpressed. , 1999, Development.

[20]  K. Tamura,et al.  MRC-5 cells induce the AER prior to the duplicated pattern formation in chick limb bud. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[21]  V. Hamburger,et al.  A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951. , 2012, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[22]  A. Kuroiwa,et al.  Homeobox gene expression correlated with the bifurcation process of limb cartilage development , 1991, Nature.

[23]  C. Stern,et al.  Fate and plasticity of the endoderm in the early chick embryo. , 2006, Developmental biology.

[24]  F. Mallein-Gerin,et al.  Temporal and spatial analysis of cartilage proteoglycan core protein gene expression during limb development by in situ hybridization. , 1988, Developmental biology.

[25]  G. Martin,et al.  Functions of FGF signalling from the apical ectodermal ridge in limb development , 2002, Nature.

[26]  K. Hara,et al.  Cell adhesiveness and affinity for limb pattern formation. , 2002, The International journal of developmental biology.

[27]  L. Wolpert.  Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  K. Tamura,et al.  Role of N‐cadherin in the sorting‐out of mesenchymal cells and in the positional identity along the proximodistal axis of the chick limb bud , 1999, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[29]  J. C. Belmonte,et al.  MKP3 mediates the cellular response to FGF8 signalling in the vertebrate limb , 2003, Nature Cell Biology.

[30]  C. Tabin,et al.  Proximodistal patterning of the limb: insights from evolutionary morphology , 2004, Evolution & development.

[31]  C. Tabin,et al.  Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. , 1996, Development.

[32]  J. Clarke,et al.  Fate maps old and new , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[33]  A. Kuroiwa,et al.  Coordinated expression of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 during limb muscle patterning. , 1998, Development.

[34]  R. L. Searls,et al.  A description of chick wing bud development and a model of limb morphogenesis. , 1973, Developmental biology.

[35]  Pier Paolo Pandolfi,et al.  Gli3 and Plzf cooperate in proximal limb patterning at early stages of limb development , 2005, Nature.

[36]  D. Stocum.  Outgrowth and pattern formation during limb ontogeny and regeneration. , 1975, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.