Validity of actigraphs uniaxial and triaxial accelerometers for assessment of physical activity in adults in laboratory conditions

BackgroundFew studies to date have directly compared the Actigraphs GT1M and the GT3X, it would be of tremendous value to know if these accelerometers give similar information about intensities of PA. Knowing if output is similar would have implications for cross-examination of studies. The purpose of the study was to assess the validity of the GT1M and the GT3X Actigraph accelerometers for the assessment of physical activity against oxygen consumption in laboratory conditions.MethodsForty-two college-aged participants aged 18-25 years wore the GT1M and the GT3X on their right hip during treadmill exercise at three different speeds, slow walking 4.8 km.h-1, fast walking 6.4 km.h-1, and running 9.7 km.h-1). Oxygen consumption was measured minute-by minute using a metabolic system. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between activity counts from the GT3X and GT1M, and correlations were assessed the ability of the accelerometers to assess physical activity.ResultsBias for 4.8 km.h-1 was 2814.4 cpm (limits 1211.3 to 4417.4), for 6.4 km.h-1 was 3713.6 cpm (limits 1573.2 to 5854.0), and for 9.7 km.h-1 was−3811.2 cpm (limits 842.1 to 6780.3). Correlations between counts per minute for the GT1M and the GT3X were significantly correlated with VO2 (r = 0.881, p < 0.001; r = 0.810, p < 0.001 respectively).ConclusionThe present study showed that both the GT1M and the GT3X accurately measure physical activity when compared to oxygen consumption.

[1]  L. Epstein,et al.  Relationships between TriTrac-R3D vectors, heart rate, and self-report in obese children. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  James F Sallis,et al.  Comparison of older and newer generations of ActiGraph accelerometers with the normal filter and the low frequency extension , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[3]  K. Janz.  Validation of the CSA accelerometer for assessing children's physical activity. , 1994, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[6]  Guy Plasqui,et al.  Measuring free-living energy expenditure and physical activity with triaxial accelerometry. , 2005, Obesity research.

[7]  J. D. Janssen,et al.  Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water. , 1996, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  S. Grant,et al.  Low physical activity levels and high levels of sedentary behaviour are characteristic of rural Irish primary school children. , 2005, Irish medical journal.

[9]  P S Freedson,et al.  Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  Gregory J. Welk,et al.  Technical Reliability Assessment of the Actigraph GT1M Accelerometer , 2010 .

[11]  Charlie Potter,et al.  Comparison of activity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[12]  D. Bassett,et al.  The technology of accelerometry-based activity monitors: current and future. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  S. Grant,et al.  Tracking physical activity and sedentary behavior in young children. , 2007, Pediatric exercise science.

[14]  D. Bassett.  Validity and reliability issues in objective monitoring of physical activity. , 2000, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[15]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  Refined two-regression model for the ActiGraph accelerometer. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  Ross C Brownson,et al.  The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[17]  John J Reilly,et al.  Objectively measured physical activity in a representative sample of 3- to 4-year-old children. , 2003, Obesity research.

[18]  A. Rowlands,et al.  Validation of the GT3X ActiGraph in children and comparison with the GT1M ActiGraph. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[19]  Catrine Tudor-Locke,et al.  Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer accuracy under controlled conditions. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Karsten Froberg,et al.  Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running. , 2003, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. (CSA) activity monitor. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[22]  Gautier Zunquin,et al.  Equivalence of accelerometer data for walking and running: Treadmill versus on land , 2009, Journal of sports sciences.

[23]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  A novel method for using accelerometer data to predict energy expenditure. , 2006, Journal of applied physiology.

[24]  S. Grant,et al.  Total energy expenditure and physical activity in young Scottish children: mixed longitudinal study , 2004, The Lancet.

[25]  Barbara E Ainsworth,et al.  Comparison of pedometer and accelerometer measures of free-living physical activity. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[26]  S. Grant,et al.  Effect of socioeconomic status on objectively measured physical activity , 2005, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[27]  P. D. Watson,et al.  Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. , 1998, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[28]  KR Westerterp,et al.  Physical activity assessment with accelerometers , 1999, International Journal of Obesity.

[29]  B. Ainsworth,et al.  Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[30]  K R Westerterp,et al.  Wrist-worn accelerometers in assessment of energy expenditure during intensive training , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[31]  R. Eston,et al.  Influence of speed and step frequency during walking and running on motion sensor output. , 2007, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[32]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[33]  R. Eston,et al.  Validity of heart rate, pedometry, and accelerometry for predicting the energy cost of children's activities. , 1998, Journal of applied physiology.

[34]  Maciej S Buchowski,et al.  Validation of the ActiGraph two-regression model for predicting energy expenditure. , 2010, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[35]  T. Cole,et al.  Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[36]  Alejandro Santos-Lozano,et al.  Technical variability of the GT3X accelerometer. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[37]  E. Fitzhugh,et al.  Leisure-time walking and compliance with ACSM/AHA aerobic-related physical activity recommendations: 1999-2004 NHANES. , 2009, Journal of physical activity & health.

[38]  D. Bassett,et al.  Estimating energy expenditure using accelerometers , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[39]  S. Blair,et al.  A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[40]  John W Staudenmayer,et al.  Accelerometer prediction of energy expenditure: vector magnitude versus vertical axis. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[41]  Kong Y Chen,et al.  Comparing the performance of three generations of ActiGraph accelerometers. , 2008, Journal of applied physiology.

[42]  P. Freedson,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.