The Hydrodynamics of a Graesser (“Raining Bucket”) Contactor with a Reverse Micellar Phase

A variety of contactor types have been assessed for the liquid‐liquid extraction of proteins using reversed micelles; however, many of these contactors suffer from drawbacks such as emulsion formation and poor mass transfer performance. In this study, a small (1.25 L) Graesser “raining bucket” contactor was assessed for use with this system since it has the potential to ameliorate many of these problems. The aim of the work was to evaluate the hydrodynamics of the contactor in order to use this information for future work on mass transfer performance. Hydrodynamic characteristics such as the axial mixing coefficient were determined by residence time distribution studies using a tracer injection method. The effect of rotor speed and flow rate of each phase on axial mixing was investigated, and as a result of its unusual structure, i.e., falling/rising sheet, the interfacial mass transfer area in the Graesser was determined by image analysis. It was found that rotor speed had more influence on the axial mixing coefficient in the aqueous phase than in the reverse micellar phase. The axial mixing coefficient in each phase increased by increasing the flow rate of the same phase. The images obtained in a dropping cell showed that under the conditions of this study (3 rpm, 22 °C), the bucket pours one phase through the other in the form of a curtain or sheet. A new image technique was developed to determine the interfacial area of both phases, and it was found that the specific area was 8.6 m2/m3, which was higher than in a spray column but considerably lower than in a RDC or a Graesser run at high rotational speed (50 rpm) without the addition of a surfactant.

[1]  S. Furusaki,et al.  Mass Transfer Performance and Mathematical Modeling of Rotating Disc Contactors Used for Reversed Micellar Extraction of Proteins. , 1997 .

[2]  J. Crespo,et al.  Extraction and re-extraction of phenylalanine by cationic reversed micelles in hollow fibre contactors , 1999 .

[3]  M. Kula,et al.  Continuous separation of whey proteins with aqueous two-phase systems in a Graesser contactor , 1994 .

[4]  Edward L Cussler,et al.  Protein extractions with hollow fibers , 1988 .

[5]  D. Armstrong,et al.  Highly selective protein separations with reversed micellar liquid membranes. , 1988, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  J. Asenjo,et al.  Reverse micellar mass‐transfer processes: Spray column extraction of lysozyme , 1996 .

[7]  D. Stuckey,et al.  Backward extraction of reverse micellar encapsulated proteins using a counterionic surfactant. , 1999, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  E. Tambourgi,et al.  Recovery of a recombinant cutinase with reversed micelles in a continuous perforated rotating disc contactor , 1994 .

[9]  Yajun Shi,et al.  Study of a Centrifugal Extractor for Protein Extraction Using Reversed Micellar Solutions , 1998 .

[10]  D. Stuckey,et al.  Lysozyme extraction from egg white using reverse micelles in a Graesser contactor: mass transfer characterization. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  A. A. Al,et al.  Drop size distribution in a graesser contactor , 1990 .

[12]  H. Takeuchi,et al.  Extraction of Proteins by Reversed Micellar Solution in a Packed Column , 1999 .

[13]  S. Lee,et al.  Separation of intracellular proteins from Candida utilis using reverse micelles in a spray column , 1993 .

[14]  M. Dekker,et al.  Enzyme recovery by liquid-liquid extraction using reversed micelles. , 1986 .

[15]  M. Kula,et al.  Performance of a Graesser contactor in the continuous extraction of whey proteins: mixing, mass transfer and efficiency. , 1995, Bioseparation.

[16]  V. Weekman,et al.  Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1974 .