Key determinants and barriers in digital innovation among small architectural organizations

The rapid development of digital technology has made architecture a succession of different evolutionary design methodologies. As a result, the rise of computationally driven processes has gain popularity in research and shows a great potential to dramatically improve the design process and productivity that evoke innovations in architectural practices wherein computer-based project plays a vital role. However, as these technologies rapidly develop and are increasingly used in practice, there is a realization that substantial organizational and technological barriers exist that inhibit the effective adoption of these technologies in architectural practices wherein complex projects are being handled. Undeniably it happens in small architectural practices whereby resources are very limited. Relevant literature of the subject shows that research in innovations in manufacturing, product design, technology, construction and engineering practices is substantially conducted but research in digital innovation in design practices is very limited. This paper investigates the factors that impede the effective adoption of emerging digital technologies for the efficient delivery of design projects that are computationally and digitally driven. This involves evaluating digital technologies, technical, financial and organizational barriers when digital innovation is implemented. In order to gain insights of these issues, a pilot study was conducted from several small architectural organizations, and found out relevant attributes and pattern of variables that can be used in establishing a framework for digital innovation.

[1]  Salman Azhar,et al.  Building Information Modeling ( BIM ) : Benefits , Risks and Challenges , 2008 .

[2]  J. Schumpeter The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle , 1934 .

[3]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[4]  Samuel Hollander,et al.  The Sources of Increased Efficiency: A Study of DuPont Rayon Plants , 1965 .

[5]  Ernest R. Gilmont Making Innovation Work: How to Manage It, Measure It, and Profit from It , 2007 .

[6]  D. Gregori,et al.  Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics , 1984 .

[7]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[8]  Dennis R. Shelden Digital surface representation and the constructibility of Gehry's architecture , 2002 .

[9]  Sven Havemann,et al.  Generative mesh modeling , 2005 .

[10]  Clark A. Cory,et al.  3D Modeling for the Architectural Engineering and Construction Industry , 2001 .

[11]  Ricardo Cabral,et al.  Adoption of a Process Innovation with Learning‐by‐Doing: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry , 2003 .

[12]  Kristina Shea,et al.  CDO: Computational Design + Optimisation in Building Practice , 2005 .

[13]  Robert E. and Laepple Eberhard S. Johnson Digital Innovation and Organizational Change in Design Practice , 2003 .

[14]  Jesper Svensson Living Lab Principles: Supporting Digital Innovation , 2012 .

[15]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Innovation Policy - A Systemic Approach , 2001 .

[16]  Marco Vivarelli,et al.  The economics of technology and employment : theory and empirical evidence , 1995 .

[17]  Singh Intrachooto Technological innovation in architecture : effective practices for energy efficient implementation , 2002 .

[18]  Branko Kolravic ARCHITECTURE IN THE DIGITAL AGE: DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING , 2003 .

[19]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[20]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Path Creation in Digital Innovation: A Multi-Layered Dialectics Perspective , 2009 .

[21]  Christoph M. Hoffmann Constraint-Based Computer-Aided Design , 2005, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[22]  W. E. G. Salter,et al.  Productivity and Technical Change. , 1961 .

[23]  Carrie Sturts Dossick,et al.  Organizational Divisions in BIM-Enabled Commercial Construction , 2010 .

[24]  Sambit Datta,et al.  Experiments with Stochastic Processes: Façade Subdivision based on Wind Motion , 2009 .

[25]  Brian Johnson Book Review: Architecture in the Digital Age , 2003 .

[26]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop 'Digital Challenges in Innovation Research' , 2010 .

[27]  Yusuf Arayici Building information modelling , 2015 .

[28]  Benjamin Naumann The Economics Of Technology And Employment Theory And Empirical Evidence , 2016 .

[29]  Martyn Jones,et al.  Managing Innovation in Construction , 2003 .

[30]  Michael Hensel Emergence : morphogenetic design strategies , 2004 .

[31]  Roberto Simonetti,et al.  Product and process innovations: How are they defined? How are they quantified? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[32]  Paul N. Cheremisinoff,et al.  Techniques for managing technological innovation: overcoming process barriers , 1983 .

[33]  Richard Luecke,et al.  Managing creativity and innovation , 2003 .

[34]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Wakes of Innovation in Project Networks: The Case of Digital 3-D Representations in Architecture, Engineering, and Construction , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[35]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma , 1997 .

[36]  In-Ho Kim,et al.  CDO : Computational Design + Optimization in Building Practice , 2006 .

[37]  Mario Pianta,et al.  The employment impact of innovation: Evidence and policy , 2000 .