Protective efficacy in humans of killed whole-vibrio oral cholera vaccine with and without the B subunit of cholera toxin

Natural protection from cholera is associated with local intestinal antibacterial and antitoxic antibodies, which appear to act synergistically. Although current parenteral cholera vaccines offer insufficient protection, new vaccines administered orally have more promise. Killed Vibrio cholerae, alone or given with the B subunit of cholera toxin, was evaluated in adult volunteers. Vaccinees, who received three doses of either vaccine, and unvaccinated controls ingested 10(6) V. cholerae organisms to determine the protective efficacy of the vaccines. The combination vaccine provided 64% protection, and the whole vibrio vaccine given alone provided 56% protection. In addition, illnesses in vaccines were milder than those in controls, and both vaccines gave complete protection against more severe disease. This substantial level of protection against a dose of V. cholerae that caused cholera in nearly 90% of controls suggests that these vaccines might provide at least as high a level of protection if given to the population of an endemic area. Indeed, a field efficacy trial is underway in Bangladesh, and preliminary data indicate a protective efficacy of 85% for a killed whole vibrio plus B subunit vaccine similar to that tested in volunteers and an efficacy of 58% for the killed whole vibrio vaccine alone. Thus, the studies in human volunteers were successful in predicting the substantial protection afforded by the vaccines in a cholera endemic area.

[1]  D. Sack,et al.  FIELD TRIAL OF ORAL CHOLERA VACCINES IN BANGLADESH , 1986, The Lancet.

[2]  M. Levine,et al.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure antibodies to purified heat-labile enterotoxins from human and porcine strains of Escherichia coli and to cholera toxin: application in serodiagnosis and seroepidemiology , 1985, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[3]  D. Sack,et al.  Mucosal antitoxic and antibacterial immunity after cholera disease and after immunization with a combined B subunit-whole cell vaccine. , 1984, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[4]  M. Levine,et al.  Evaluation of the human immune response to outer membrane proteins of Vibrio cholerae , 1984, Infection and immunity.

[5]  M. Levine,et al.  New knowledge on pathogenesis of bacterial enteric infections as applied to vaccine development. , 1983, Microbiological reviews.

[6]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Receptor-like glycocompounds in human milk that inhibit classical and El Tor Vibrio cholerae cell adherence (hemagglutination) , 1983, Infection and immunity.

[7]  W. Cray,et al.  Oral Immunization of Dogs with Purified Cholera Toxin, Crude Cholera Toxin, or B Subunit: Evidence for Synergistic Protection by Antitoxic and Antibacterial Mechanisms , 1982, Infection and immunity.

[8]  M. Levine,et al.  Magnitude, kinetics, and duration of vibriocidal antibody responses in North Americans after ingestion of Vibrio cholerae. , 1982, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[9]  J. Holmgren Actions of cholera toxin and the prevention and treatment of cholera , 1981, Nature.

[10]  L. Cisneros,et al.  Duration of infection-derived immunity to cholera. , 1981, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[11]  M. Rennels,et al.  Selective vs. nonselective media and direct plating vs. enrichment technique in isolation of Vibrio cholerae: recommendations for clinical laboratories. , 1980, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[12]  M. Levine Immunity to Cholera as Evaluated in Volunteers , 1980 .

[13]  N. Pierce The role of antigen form and function in the primary and secondary intestinal immune responses to cholera toxin and toxoid in rats , 1978, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[14]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Development of improved cholera vaccine based on subunit toxoid , 1977, Nature.

[15]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Synergistic protective effect in rabbits of immunization with Vibrio cholerae lipopolysaccharide and toxin/toxoid , 1976, Infection and immunity.

[16]  N. Pierce,et al.  Response of man to infection with Vibrio cholerae. II. Protection from illness afforded by previous disease and vaccine. , 1974, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[17]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Cholera Serology , 1973, Infection and immunity.

[18]  R. Finkelstein,et al.  PATHOGENESIS OF EXPERIMENTAL CHOLERA : PREPARATION AND ISOLATION OF CHOLERAGEN AND CHOLERAGENOID , 1969 .

[19]  J. Heremans,et al.  Immunochemical quantitation of antigens by single radial immunodiffusion. , 1965, Immunochemistry.

[20]  D. Sack,et al.  Local and systemic antibody responses and immunological memory in humans after immunization with cholera B subunit by different routes. , 1984, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[21]  J. Holmgren,et al.  Receptor-specific large-scale purification of cholera toxin on silica beads derivatized with lysoGM1 ganglioside. , 1981, European journal of biochemistry.

[22]  A. Svennerholm The Nature of Protective Immunity in Cholera1 , 1980 .

[23]  K. Aziz,et al.  Immunological aspects of a cholera toxoid field trial in Bangladesh. , 1978 .

[24]  W. Dewitt,et al.  A controlled field trial of plain and aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed cholera vaccines in Surabaya, Indonesia, during 1973--75. , 1978, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[25]  R. Wenzel,et al.  Response of man to infection with Vibrio cholerae. I. Clinical, serologic, and bacteriologic responses to a known inoculum. , 1974, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[26]  W. Mosley,et al.  The relationship of vibriocidal antibody titre to susceptibility to cholera in family contacts of cholera patients. , 1968, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.