Challenges and opportunities for biogeography—What can we still learn from von Humboldt?
暂无分享,去创建一个
Richard Field | Franziska Schrodt | F. Schrodt | M. Santos | Joseph J. Bailey | Richard Field | Maria J. Santos
[1] R. Irizarry. ggplot2 , 2019, Introduction to Data Science.
[2] Brian J. McGill,et al. The what, how and why of doing macroecology , 2018, Global Ecology and Biogeography.
[3] M. Gray. The confused position of the geosciences within the “natural capital” and “ecosystem services” approaches , 2018, Ecosystem Services.
[4] Y. Malhi,et al. Widespread but heterogeneous responses of Andean forests to climate change , 2018, Nature.
[5] Martin A. Nuñez,et al. Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters , 2018, PLoS biology.
[6] D. Boyd,et al. Models of upland species’ distributions are improved by accounting for geodiversity , 2018, Landscape Ecology.
[7] Susanne A. Fritz,et al. Geological and climatic influences on mountain biodiversity , 2018, Nature Geoscience.
[8] Damien A. Fordham,et al. Cracking the Code of Biodiversity Responses to Past Climate Change. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[9] Christine Laney,et al. Facilitating and Improving Environmental Research Data Repository Interoperability , 2018, Data Sci. J..
[10] Anne D. Bjorkman,et al. Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
[11] Lynsey R. Harper,et al. Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds , 2018, Hydrobiologia.
[12] L. Clausen,et al. The sceptical optimist: challenges and perspectives for the application of environmental DNA in marine fisheries , 2018 .
[13] J. Svenning,et al. Geography of Plants in the New World: Humboldt's Relevance in the Age of Big Data 1 , 2018, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden.
[14] J. Hjort,et al. The role of geodiversity in providing ecosystem services at broad scales , 2018, Ecological Indicators.
[15] Stefan B. Williams,et al. BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene , 2018, Global Ecology and Biogeography.
[16] Emily S. Darling,et al. Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? , 2018, FACETS.
[17] Luke J. Harmon,et al. Building up biogeography: Pattern to process , 2018 .
[18] D. Tilman,et al. Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
[19] Ben Somers,et al. The functional characterization of grass- and shrubland ecosystems using hyperspectral remote sensing: trends, accuracy and moderating variables , 2018 .
[20] Niklaus E. Zimmermann,et al. Accelerated increase in plant species richness on mountain summits is linked to warming , 2018, Nature.
[21] Walter Jetz,et al. A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling , 2018, Scientific Data.
[22] Derek Rogge,et al. Building an exposed soil composite processor (SCMaP) for mapping spatial and temporal characteristics of soils with Landsat imagery (1984–2014) , 2018 .
[23] Martin A. Nuñez,et al. Lags in the response of mountain plant communities to climate change , 2018, Global change biology.
[24] Jianguo Wu,et al. How can landscape ecology contribute to sustainability science? , 2018, Landscape Ecology.
[25] Christopher B. Blackwood,et al. Fine-Root Ecology Database (FRED): A Global Collection of Root Trait Data with Coincident Site, Vegetation, Edaphic, and Climatic Data, Version 2. , 2018 .
[26] J. Gurevitch,et al. Explaining global variation in the latitudinal diversity gradient: Meta‐analysis confirms known patterns and uncovers new ones , 2018 .
[27] James H. Thorne,et al. The relative influence of change in habitat and climate on elevation range limits in small mammals in Yosemite National Park, California, U.S.A. , 2017, Climate Change Responses.
[28] Doreen S. Boyd,et al. Modelling native and alien vascular plant species richness: At which scales is geodiversity most relevant? , 2017 .
[29] Duccio Rocchini,et al. A multi-temporal approach in MaxEnt modelling: A new frontier for land use/land cover change detection , 2017, Ecol. Informatics.
[30] F. Arnaud,et al. From core referencing to data re-use: two French national initiatives to reinforce paleodata stewardship (National Cyber Core Repository and LTER France Retro-Observatory) , 2017 .
[31] B. Scanlon,et al. The food‐energy‐water nexus: Transforming science for society , 2017 .
[32] Richard H. Ree,et al. Uplift-driven diversification in the Hengduan Mountains, a temperate biodiversity hotspot , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[33] W. Lotko. The Unifying Principle of Coordinated Measurements in Geospace Science , 2017 .
[34] J. Hjort,et al. Combining geodiversity with climate and topography to account for threatened species richness , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[35] M. Ribeiro,et al. Additions of landscape metrics improve predictions of occurrence of species distribution models , 2017, Journal of Forestry Research.
[36] Isabelle Mougenot,et al. Towards a thesaurus of plant characteristics: an ecological contribution , 2017 .
[37] Catherine Badgley,et al. Biodiversity and Topographic Complexity: Modern and Geohistorical Perspectives. , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[38] N. Cooper,et al. A Guide to Reproducible Code in Ecology and Evolution , 2017 .
[39] Anna F. Cord,et al. Linking earth observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: local to ecosystem perspectives , 2016 .
[40] J.G.B. Leenaars,et al. WoSIS: providing standardised soil profile data for the world , 2016 .
[41] Gary N. Geller,et al. The role of space agencies in remotely sensed essential biodiversity variables , 2016 .
[42] P. V. Beukering,et al. Geosystem services:A concept in support of sustainable development of the subsurface , 2016 .
[43] S. Renner. Available data point to a 4‐km‐high Tibetan Plateau by 40 Ma, but 100 molecular‐clock papers have linked supposed recent uplift to young node ages , 2016 .
[44] M. Kuitunen,et al. The role of landscape, topography, and geodiversity in explaining vascular plant species richness in a fragmented landscape , 2016 .
[45] Daniel S Falster,et al. The Coral Trait Database, a curated database of trait information for coral species from the global oceans , 2016, Scientific Data.
[46] Martin Hermy,et al. Combining Biodiversity Resurveys across Regions to Advance Global Change Research , 2017 .
[47] Markus Reichstein,et al. The imprint of plants on ecosystem functioning: A data-driven approach , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.
[48] Anuj Karpatne,et al. BHPMF – a hierarchical Bayesian approach to gap-filling and trait prediction for macroecology and functional biogeography , 2015 .
[49] Jens-Christian Svenning,et al. Strong upslope shifts in Chimborazo's vegetation over two centuries since Humboldt , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[50] S. Dobrowski,et al. The theory behind, and the challenges of, conserving nature's stage in a time of rapid change , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[51] Craig McClain,et al. Ten Simple Rules for Effective Online Outreach , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[52] Boris Schröder,et al. Biodiversity research: data without theory—theory without data , 2015, Front. Ecol. Evol..
[53] Jarrett J. Barber,et al. Quantifying ecological memory in plant and ecosystem processes. , 2015, Ecology letters.
[54] E. Sudicky,et al. Hyper‐resolution global hydrological modelling: what is next? , 2015 .
[55] Andrea Wulf. The Invention of Nature , 2015 .
[56] H. Kreft,et al. Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. , 2014, Ecology letters.
[57] B. Enquist,et al. The n‐dimensional hypervolume , 2014 .
[58] P. Jones,et al. Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .
[59] M. Nicolson. Community concepts in plant ecology: from Humboldtian plant geography to the superorganism and beyond , 2013 .
[60] P. Reich,et al. New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .
[61] J. Rockström,et al. Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet , 2013, Nature.
[62] R. Gillespie. The International Biogeography Society: enabling a dynamic discipline , 2013 .
[63] Y. Laumonier,et al. Suitability of Local Resource Management Practices Based on Supernatural Enforcement Mechanisms in the Local Social-cultural Context , 2012 .
[64] Inclusion of explicit measures of geodiversity improve biodiversity models in a boreal landscape , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.
[65] A. Buttimer. Alexander von Humboldt and planet earth’s green mantle , 2012 .
[66] M. Luoto,et al. Can geodiversity be predicted from space , 2012 .
[67] Päivi Elisabet Haapasaari,et al. Growing into Interdisciplinarity: How to Converge Biology, Economics, and Social Science in Fisheries Research? , 2012 .
[68] John Ingram,et al. Responding to complex societal challenges: A decade of Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP) interdisciplinary research , 2012 .
[69] R. Dorn,et al. Revisiting Alexander von Humboldt’s Initiation of Rock Coating Research , 2012, The Journal of Geology.
[70] G. Mace,et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[71] S. Higgins,et al. TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.
[72] Alicia Lubowski-Jahn. A Comparative Analysis of the Landscape Aesthetics of Alexander von Humboldt and John Ruskin , 2011 .
[73] S. Doney,et al. Riverine coupling of biogeochemical cycles between land, oceans, and atmosphere , 2011 .
[74] T. Stadler,et al. Amazonia Through Time: Andean Uplift, Climate Change, Landscape Evolution, and Biodiversity , 2010, Science.
[75] H. Bohn,et al. Views of Nature: Or, Contemplations on the Sublime Phenomena of Creation , 2010 .
[76] J. Tollefson. Climate science: An erosion of trust? , 2010, Nature.
[77] Hadley Wickham,et al. ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .
[78] F. Egerton. A History of the Ecological Sciences, Part 32: Humboldt, Nature's Geographer , 2009 .
[79] S. T. Jackson. Alexander von Humboldt and the General Physics of the Earth , 2009, Science.
[80] Daniel E. Bunker,et al. TraitNet: furthering biodiversity research through the curation, discovery, and sharing of species trait data , 2009 .
[81] C. Eliot. Method and metaphysics in Clements's and Gleason's ecological explanations. , 2007, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.
[82] Thomas Söderqvist. :Alexander von Humboldt: A Metabiography , 2007 .
[83] J. Platt. Strong Inference , 2007 .
[84] Eileen M. O'Brien. Biological relativity to water–energy dynamics , 2006 .
[85] O. Vetaas. Biological relativity to water–energy dynamics: a potential unifying theory? , 2006 .
[86] S. Zeller. Humboldt and the Habitability of Canada's Great Northwest* , 2006 .
[87] Humboldt and the History of Environmental Thought , 2006 .
[88] Exploring the Americas in a Humboldt Digital Library , 2006 .
[89] K. Zimmerer. Humboldt's Nodes and Modes of Interdisciplinary Environmental Science in the Andean World* , 2006 .
[90] S. Shapin. Lives after death , 2006, Nature.
[91] M. Ebach,et al. The first biogeographical map , 2006 .
[92] C. Graham,et al. Niche Conservatism: Integrating Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation Biology , 2005 .
[93] Keith Richards,et al. Earth System Science: an oxymoron? , 2005 .
[94] V. Santucci. Historical Perspectives on Biodiversity and Geodiversity , 2005 .
[95] M. Donoghue,et al. Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[96] A. Sachs. The Ultimate “Other”: Post-Colonialism and Alexander von Humboldt's Ecological Relationship with Nature , 2003 .
[97] Susan Stocklmayer,et al. Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition , 2003 .
[98] Adrienne Martin,et al. Methods and issues in exploring local knowledge of soils , 2003 .
[99] R. P. McIntosh,et al. H.A. Gleason and the individualistic hypothesis revisisted , 2002 .
[100] B. Hawkins. Ecology's oldest pattern? , 2001, Endeavour.
[101] A. Buttimer,et al. BEYOND HUMBOLDTIAN SCIENCE AND GOETHE'S WAY OF SCIENCE: CHALLENGES OF ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT'S GEOGRAPHY , 2001 .
[102] M. Dettelbach. The Face of Nature: Precise Measurement, Mapping, and Sensibility in the Work of Alexander von Humboldt , 1999 .
[103] Paul R. Ehrlich,et al. Managing Earth's Ecosystems: An Interdisciplinary Challenge , 1999, Ecosystems.
[104] Jürgen Osterhammel. Alexander von Humboldt: Historiker der Gesellschaft, Historiker der Natur , 1999 .
[105] R. Whittaker,et al. Climate and woody plant diversity in southern Africa : relationships at species, genus and family levels , 1998 .
[106] Eileen M. O'Brien. Water‐energy dynamics, climate, and prediction of woody plant species richness: an interim general model , 1998 .
[107] R. Mitchell,et al. Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modelling , 1992 .
[108] Malcolm Nicolson,et al. Alexander von Humboldt, Humboldtian Science and the Origins of the Study of Vegetation , 1987 .
[109] D. Worster. Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas , 1986 .
[110] M. Bowen. Mind and nature the physical geography of Alexander Von Humboldt , 1970 .
[111] F. Egerton,et al. Humboldt, Darwin, and population , 1970, Journal of the history of biology.
[112] J. Platt. Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.
[113] Alexander von . Humboldt,et al. Kosmos. Entwurf einer physischen Weltbeschreibung , 1849, The British and foreign medico-chirurgical review.
[114] A. V. Humboldt,et al. Kosmos. Entwurf einer physischen Weltbeschreibung von Alexander von Humboldt ... , 1845 .