Challenges and opportunities for biogeography—What can we still learn from von Humboldt?

Alexander von Humboldt was arguably the most influential scientist of his day. Although his fame has since lessened relative to some of his contemporaries, we argue that his influence remains strong—mainly because his approach to science inspired others and was instrumental in furthering other scientific disciplines (such as evolution, through Darwin, and conservation science, through Muir)—and that he changed the way that large areas of science are done and communicated. Indeed, he has been called the father of a range of fields, including environmental science, earth system science, plant geography, ecology and conservation. His approach was characterized by making connections between non‐living and living nature (including humans), based on interdisciplinary thinking and informed by large amounts of data from systematic, accurate measurements in a geographical framework. Although his approach largely lacked an evolutionary perspective, he was fundamental to creating the circumstances for Darwin and Wallace to advance evolutionary science. He devoted considerable effort illustrating, communicating and popularizing science, centred on the excitement of pure science. In biogeography, his influence remains strong, including in relating climate to species distributions (e.g. biomes and latitudinal and elevational gradients) and in the use of remote sensing and species distribution modelling in macroecology. However, some key aspects of his approach have faded, particularly as science fragmented into specific disciplines and became more reductionist. We argue that asking questions in a more Humboldtian way is important for addressing current global challenges. This is well‐exemplified by researching links between geodiversity and biodiversity. Progress on this can be made by (a) systematic data collection to improve our knowledge of biodiversity and geodiversity around the world; (b) improving our understanding of the linkages between biodiversity and geodiversity; and (c) developing our understanding of the interactions of geological, biological, ecological, environmental and evolutionary processes in biogeography.

[1]  R. Irizarry ggplot2 , 2019, Introduction to Data Science.

[2]  Brian J. McGill,et al.  The what, how and why of doing macroecology , 2018, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[3]  M. Gray The confused position of the geosciences within the “natural capital” and “ecosystem services” approaches , 2018, Ecosystem Services.

[4]  Y. Malhi,et al.  Widespread but heterogeneous responses of Andean forests to climate change , 2018, Nature.

[5]  Martin A. Nuñez,et al.  Biodiversity assessments: Origin matters , 2018, PLoS biology.

[6]  D. Boyd,et al.  Models of upland species’ distributions are improved by accounting for geodiversity , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[7]  Susanne A. Fritz,et al.  Geological and climatic influences on mountain biodiversity , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[8]  Damien A. Fordham,et al.  Cracking the Code of Biodiversity Responses to Past Climate Change. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  Christine Laney,et al.  Facilitating and Improving Environmental Research Data Repository Interoperability , 2018, Data Sci. J..

[10]  Anne D. Bjorkman,et al.  Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[11]  Lynsey R. Harper,et al.  Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds , 2018, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  L. Clausen,et al.  The sceptical optimist: challenges and perspectives for the application of environmental DNA in marine fisheries , 2018 .

[13]  J. Svenning,et al.  Geography of Plants in the New World: Humboldt's Relevance in the Age of Big Data 1 , 2018, Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden.

[14]  J. Hjort,et al.  The role of geodiversity in providing ecosystem services at broad scales , 2018, Ecological Indicators.

[15]  Stefan B. Williams,et al.  BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene , 2018, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[16]  Emily S. Darling,et al.  Scientists on Twitter: Preaching to the choir or singing from the rooftops? , 2018, FACETS.

[17]  Luke J. Harmon,et al.  Building up biogeography: Pattern to process , 2018 .

[18]  D. Tilman,et al.  Plant spectral diversity integrates functional and phylogenetic components of biodiversity and predicts ecosystem function , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[19]  Ben Somers,et al.  The functional characterization of grass- and shrubland ecosystems using hyperspectral remote sensing: trends, accuracy and moderating variables , 2018 .

[20]  Niklaus E. Zimmermann,et al.  Accelerated increase in plant species richness on mountain summits is linked to warming , 2018, Nature.

[21]  Walter Jetz,et al.  A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling , 2018, Scientific Data.

[22]  Derek Rogge,et al.  Building an exposed soil composite processor (SCMaP) for mapping spatial and temporal characteristics of soils with Landsat imagery (1984–2014) , 2018 .

[23]  Martin A. Nuñez,et al.  Lags in the response of mountain plant communities to climate change , 2018, Global change biology.

[24]  Jianguo Wu,et al.  How can landscape ecology contribute to sustainability science? , 2018, Landscape Ecology.

[25]  Christopher B. Blackwood,et al.  Fine-Root Ecology Database (FRED): A Global Collection of Root Trait Data with Coincident Site, Vegetation, Edaphic, and Climatic Data, Version 2. , 2018 .

[26]  J. Gurevitch,et al.  Explaining global variation in the latitudinal diversity gradient: Meta‐analysis confirms known patterns and uncovers new ones , 2018 .

[27]  James H. Thorne,et al.  The relative influence of change in habitat and climate on elevation range limits in small mammals in Yosemite National Park, California, U.S.A. , 2017, Climate Change Responses.

[28]  Doreen S. Boyd,et al.  Modelling native and alien vascular plant species richness: At which scales is geodiversity most relevant? , 2017 .

[29]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  A multi-temporal approach in MaxEnt modelling: A new frontier for land use/land cover change detection , 2017, Ecol. Informatics.

[30]  F. Arnaud,et al.  From core referencing to data re-use: two French national initiatives to reinforce paleodata stewardship (National Cyber Core Repository and LTER France Retro-Observatory) , 2017 .

[31]  B. Scanlon,et al.  The food‐energy‐water nexus: Transforming science for society , 2017 .

[32]  Richard H. Ree,et al.  Uplift-driven diversification in the Hengduan Mountains, a temperate biodiversity hotspot , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  W. Lotko The Unifying Principle of Coordinated Measurements in Geospace Science , 2017 .

[34]  J. Hjort,et al.  Combining geodiversity with climate and topography to account for threatened species richness , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[35]  M. Ribeiro,et al.  Additions of landscape metrics improve predictions of occurrence of species distribution models , 2017, Journal of Forestry Research.

[36]  Isabelle Mougenot,et al.  Towards a thesaurus of plant characteristics: an ecological contribution , 2017 .

[37]  Catherine Badgley,et al.  Biodiversity and Topographic Complexity: Modern and Geohistorical Perspectives. , 2017, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[38]  N. Cooper,et al.  A Guide to Reproducible Code in Ecology and Evolution , 2017 .

[39]  Anna F. Cord,et al.  Linking earth observation and taxonomic, structural and functional biodiversity: local to ecosystem perspectives , 2016 .

[40]  J.G.B. Leenaars,et al.  WoSIS: providing standardised soil profile data for the world , 2016 .

[41]  Gary N. Geller,et al.  The role of space agencies in remotely sensed essential biodiversity variables , 2016 .

[42]  P. V. Beukering,et al.  Geosystem services:A concept in support of sustainable development of the subsurface , 2016 .

[43]  S. Renner Available data point to a 4‐km‐high Tibetan Plateau by 40 Ma, but 100 molecular‐clock papers have linked supposed recent uplift to young node ages , 2016 .

[44]  M. Kuitunen,et al.  The role of landscape, topography, and geodiversity in explaining vascular plant species richness in a fragmented landscape , 2016 .

[45]  Daniel S Falster,et al.  The Coral Trait Database, a curated database of trait information for coral species from the global oceans , 2016, Scientific Data.

[46]  Martin Hermy,et al.  Combining Biodiversity Resurveys across Regions to Advance Global Change Research , 2017 .

[47]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  The imprint of plants on ecosystem functioning: A data-driven approach , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[48]  Anuj Karpatne,et al.  BHPMF – a hierarchical Bayesian approach to gap-filling and trait prediction for macroecology and functional biogeography , 2015 .

[49]  Jens-Christian Svenning,et al.  Strong upslope shifts in Chimborazo's vegetation over two centuries since Humboldt , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[50]  S. Dobrowski,et al.  The theory behind, and the challenges of, conserving nature's stage in a time of rapid change , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[51]  Craig McClain,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for Effective Online Outreach , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[52]  Boris Schröder,et al.  Biodiversity research: data without theory—theory without data , 2015, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[53]  Jarrett J. Barber,et al.  Quantifying ecological memory in plant and ecosystem processes. , 2015, Ecology letters.

[54]  E. Sudicky,et al.  Hyper‐resolution global hydrological modelling: what is next? , 2015 .

[55]  Andrea Wulf The Invention of Nature , 2015 .

[56]  H. Kreft,et al.  Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[57]  B. Enquist,et al.  The n‐dimensional hypervolume , 2014 .

[58]  P. Jones,et al.  Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .

[59]  M. Nicolson Community concepts in plant ecology: from Humboldtian plant geography to the superorganism and beyond , 2013 .

[60]  P. Reich,et al.  New handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2013 .

[61]  J. Rockström,et al.  Policy: Sustainable development goals for people and planet , 2013, Nature.

[62]  R. Gillespie The International Biogeography Society: enabling a dynamic discipline , 2013 .

[63]  Y. Laumonier,et al.  Suitability of Local Resource Management Practices Based on Supernatural Enforcement Mechanisms in the Local Social-cultural Context , 2012 .

[64]  Inclusion of explicit measures of geodiversity improve biodiversity models in a boreal landscape , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[65]  A. Buttimer Alexander von Humboldt and planet earth’s green mantle , 2012 .

[66]  M. Luoto,et al.  Can geodiversity be predicted from space , 2012 .

[67]  Päivi Elisabet Haapasaari,et al.  Growing into Interdisciplinarity: How to Converge Biology, Economics, and Social Science in Fisheries Research? , 2012 .

[68]  John Ingram,et al.  Responding to complex societal challenges: A decade of Earth System Science Partnership (ESSP) interdisciplinary research , 2012 .

[69]  R. Dorn,et al.  Revisiting Alexander von Humboldt’s Initiation of Rock Coating Research , 2012, The Journal of Geology.

[70]  G. Mace,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[71]  S. Higgins,et al.  TRY – a global database of plant traits , 2011, Global Change Biology.

[72]  Alicia Lubowski-Jahn A Comparative Analysis of the Landscape Aesthetics of Alexander von Humboldt and John Ruskin , 2011 .

[73]  S. Doney,et al.  Riverine coupling of biogeochemical cycles between land, oceans, and atmosphere , 2011 .

[74]  T. Stadler,et al.  Amazonia Through Time: Andean Uplift, Climate Change, Landscape Evolution, and Biodiversity , 2010, Science.

[75]  H. Bohn,et al.  Views of Nature: Or, Contemplations on the Sublime Phenomena of Creation , 2010 .

[76]  J. Tollefson Climate science: An erosion of trust? , 2010, Nature.

[77]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[78]  F. Egerton A History of the Ecological Sciences, Part 32: Humboldt, Nature's Geographer , 2009 .

[79]  S. T. Jackson Alexander von Humboldt and the General Physics of the Earth , 2009, Science.

[80]  Daniel E. Bunker,et al.  TraitNet: furthering biodiversity research through the curation, discovery, and sharing of species trait data , 2009 .

[81]  C. Eliot Method and metaphysics in Clements's and Gleason's ecological explanations. , 2007, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences.

[82]  Thomas Söderqvist :Alexander von Humboldt: A Metabiography , 2007 .

[83]  J. Platt Strong Inference , 2007 .

[84]  Eileen M. O'Brien Biological relativity to water–energy dynamics , 2006 .

[85]  O. Vetaas Biological relativity to water–energy dynamics: a potential unifying theory? , 2006 .

[86]  S. Zeller Humboldt and the Habitability of Canada's Great Northwest* , 2006 .

[87]  Humboldt and the History of Environmental Thought , 2006 .

[88]  Exploring the Americas in a Humboldt Digital Library , 2006 .

[89]  K. Zimmerer Humboldt's Nodes and Modes of Interdisciplinary Environmental Science in the Andean World* , 2006 .

[90]  S. Shapin Lives after death , 2006, Nature.

[91]  M. Ebach,et al.  The first biogeographical map , 2006 .

[92]  C. Graham,et al.  Niche Conservatism: Integrating Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation Biology , 2005 .

[93]  Keith Richards,et al.  Earth System Science: an oxymoron? , 2005 .

[94]  V. Santucci Historical Perspectives on Biodiversity and Geodiversity , 2005 .

[95]  M. Donoghue,et al.  Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[96]  A. Sachs The Ultimate “Other”: Post-Colonialism and Alexander von Humboldt's Ecological Relationship with Nature , 2003 .

[97]  Susan Stocklmayer,et al.  Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition , 2003 .

[98]  Adrienne Martin,et al.  Methods and issues in exploring local knowledge of soils , 2003 .

[99]  R. P. McIntosh,et al.  H.A. Gleason and the individualistic hypothesis revisisted , 2002 .

[100]  B. Hawkins Ecology's oldest pattern? , 2001, Endeavour.

[101]  A. Buttimer,et al.  BEYOND HUMBOLDTIAN SCIENCE AND GOETHE'S WAY OF SCIENCE: CHALLENGES OF ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT'S GEOGRAPHY , 2001 .

[102]  M. Dettelbach The Face of Nature: Precise Measurement, Mapping, and Sensibility in the Work of Alexander von Humboldt , 1999 .

[103]  Paul R. Ehrlich,et al.  Managing Earth's Ecosystems: An Interdisciplinary Challenge , 1999, Ecosystems.

[104]  Jürgen Osterhammel Alexander von Humboldt: Historiker der Gesellschaft, Historiker der Natur , 1999 .

[105]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Climate and woody plant diversity in southern Africa : relationships at species, genus and family levels , 1998 .

[106]  Eileen M. O'Brien Water‐energy dynamics, climate, and prediction of woody plant species richness: an interim general model , 1998 .

[107]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Testing evolutionary and ecological hypotheses using path analysis and structural equation modelling , 1992 .

[108]  Malcolm Nicolson,et al.  Alexander von Humboldt, Humboldtian Science and the Origins of the Study of Vegetation , 1987 .

[109]  D. Worster Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas , 1986 .

[110]  M. Bowen Mind and nature the physical geography of Alexander Von Humboldt , 1970 .

[111]  F. Egerton,et al.  Humboldt, Darwin, and population , 1970, Journal of the history of biology.

[112]  J. Platt Strong Inference: Certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. , 1964, Science.

[113]  Alexander von . Humboldt,et al.  Kosmos. Entwurf einer physischen Weltbeschreibung , 1849, The British and foreign medico-chirurgical review.

[114]  A. V. Humboldt,et al.  Kosmos. Entwurf einer physischen Weltbeschreibung von Alexander von Humboldt ... , 1845 .