Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Technologies for Mobility and Their Implications for Active Ageing

Purpose: Active ageing is defined as the process of optimizing opportunities for physical, social and mental health to enable older people to actively take part in society without discrimination and to enjoy independence and good quality of life. The World Health Organization assumed this to be a process for increasing and maintaining an individual’s participation in activities to enhance his/her quality of life. In this survey, the authors addressed the following question: is assistive technology (AT) for mobility contributing to enhancement of lifelong capacity and performance? Method: From June 2015 until February 2016, 96 community dwelling adults, AT users for mobility (powered wheelchairs, manual wheelchairs, lower limb prostheses, walkers, crutches and canes), aged 45–97, mean 67.02 ± 14.24 years old, 56.3% female, were interviewed using the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (P-PIADS), the Activities and Participation Profile related to Mobility (APPM) and demographics, clinical and questions about AT use and training. Results and Discussion: The participants’ profiles revealed moderate limitation and restrictions in participation, measured by the APPM (2.03). Most participants displayed a positive impact from AT; average scores obtained from the P-PIADS subscales were: Self-esteem 0.62, Competency 1.11 and Adaptability 1.10. The P-PIADS total was 0.96, with the powered wheelchair users scoring the highest (1.53) and the walker users scoring the lowest (0.73). All subscales and the P-PIADS total were positively correlated with the activities and participation profile. There was no relation between age and the psychosocial impact of AT or activities and participation profile. These results encourage the authors to follow up with these participants for a lifelong intervention. To accomplish that aim, currently, the protocol is implemented at the AT prescribing centers in Coimbra, Portugal in order to assess the impact of AT on participation in society, one of the domains of the Active Ageing Index, a new analytical tool to help policy makers in developing policies for active and healthy ageing.

[1]  M. Scherer,et al.  Assistive Technology Use and Stigma , 2004 .

[2]  Å. Brandt,et al.  Older people's use of powered wheelchairs for activity and participation. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[3]  Marcia J. Scherer,et al.  Assessing the Benefits of Assistive Technologies for Activities and Participation. , 2005 .

[4]  J. Jutai,et al.  Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) , 2002 .

[5]  A. Ross,et al.  Medical and Assistive Health Technology: Meeting the Needs of Aging Populations. , 2016, The Gerontologist.

[6]  Daniel Fok,et al.  Evaluating use and outcomes of mobility technology: A multiple stakeholder analysis , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[7]  M. Post,et al.  Is manual wheelchair satisfaction related to active lifestyle and participation in people with a spinal cord injury? , 2011, Spinal Cord.

[8]  Kyung-Ah Kang,et al.  Meaning of life for adolescents with a physical disability in Korea. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  S. Studenski,et al.  Successful aging as a continuum of functional independence: lessons from physical disability models of aging. , 2012, Aging and disease.

[10]  Jeffrey W Jutai,et al.  The Effect of Wheelchair Use on the Quality of Life of Persons with Multiple Sclerosis , 2004, Occupational therapy in health care.

[11]  Peter R. Giacobbi,et al.  Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[12]  Kelly Carr,et al.  Universal Design: A Step toward Successful Aging , 2013, Journal of aging research.

[13]  Michael L Boninger,et al.  Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[14]  T. Z. Berra,et al.  Integrated health service delivery networks and tuberculosis avoidable hospitalizations: is there a relation between them in Brazil? , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[15]  Philippa Clarke,et al.  Environments for healthy ageing: a critical review. , 2009, Maturitas.

[16]  R. Jackson,et al.  Mobility and aging: new directions for public health action. , 2012, American journal of public health.

[17]  L. Gitlin,et al.  Emerging concerns of older stroke patients about assistive device use. , 1998, The Gerontologist.

[18]  James M. Keller,et al.  Technology for Successful Aging , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[19]  Gert Jan Gelderblom,et al.  The Role of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and Quality Criteria for Improving Assistive Technology Service Delivery in Europe , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[20]  S. Söderberg,et al.  Disabled Persons' Experience of Dependence on Assistive Devices , 2002 .

[21]  Reliability and validity of the telephone administration of the wheelchair outcome measure (WhOM) for middle-aged and older users of power mobility devices. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[22]  A. Ross,et al.  Assistive technologies for ageing populations in six low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review , 2015, BMJ Innovations.

[23]  C. Löfqvist,et al.  Mobility and mobility-related participation outcomes of powered wheelchair and scooter interventions after 4-months and 1-year use , 2012, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[24]  Jordan Carver,et al.  The impact of mobility assistive technology devices on participation for individuals with disabilities , 2015, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[25]  Albert M. Cook,et al.  Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice , 1995 .

[26]  Annika Näslund,et al.  The psychosocial impact on standing devices , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[27]  Sung-Il Cho,et al.  The relationship between social participation and self-rated health by sex and age: a cross-sectional survey. , 2008, International journal of nursing studies.