Economics of Microsurgical Cases and Routine Cases in a Medical Center

This report describes the economic impact of microsurgical cases and routine plastic surgery cases in our medical center. The study is based on a financial analysis of the practices of two surgeons. Financial data of patient encounters (admission to the hospital or a surgical unit) identified with each surgeon were categorized into microsurgical and related cases and routine cases (including cosmetic procedures and general hand cases). Revenues, costs, and profits were tabulated. Data were analyzed for 2 fiscal years (1994‐95 and 1995‐96). Analysis of the first fiscal year showed that microsurgery encounters (n = 188) generated $4.4 million in revenue with a profit margin after direct costs of $2.5 million (57 percent) and a net profit, after indirect costs, of $1 million (23 percent). Routine encounters (n = 262) generated $1.7 million with a net loss of —$145,000 after direct and indirect costs. In the second fiscal year, microsurgery encounters (n = 230) had income of $4.7 million, a profit over direct costs of $2.5 million (53 percent), and a net profit after indirect costs of $0.9 million (19 percent). Routine cases (n = 202) in the same period earned $1.3 million with a net loss of — $107,000. This analysis formulates a comprehensive definition of microsurgical practice and shows that cases within this definition generated dramatically higher hospital incomes and profits compared with routine plastic surgical practice. In the circumstances of our medical center, development of this subspecialty is fiscally justifiable. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105: 46, 2000.)

[1]  D A Hidalgo,et al.  A Review of 716 Consecutive Free Flaps for Oncologic Surgical Defects: Refinement in Donor‐Site Selection and Technique , 1998, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  J. Serletti,et al.  Free Versus the Pedicled TRAM Flap: A Cost Comparison and Outcome Analysis , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  R. Pearl,et al.  An Economic Analysis of Health Care Reform and Its Implications for Plastic Surgery , 1997, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[4]  P. Cordeiro,et al.  Soft tissue coverage of mandibular reconstruction plates , 1994, Head & neck.

[5]  R. Russell,et al.  Late Functional Outcome in Patients with Tibia Fractures Covered with Free Muscle Flaps , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[6]  M. Miller,et al.  Comparison of the rectus abdominis free flap with the pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for reconstructions in the head and neck. , 1992, American journal of surgery.

[7]  G. Carlson,et al.  Total Reconstruction of the Hypopharynx and Cervical Esophagus: A 20-Year Experience , 1992, Annals of plastic surgery.

[8]  G. Reece,et al.  Costs and Complications in Mandibular Reconstruction , 1992, Annals of plastic surgery.

[9]  W. Lineaweaver,et al.  Scalp Reconstruction by Microvascular Free Tissue Transfer , 1990, Annals of plastic surgery.

[10]  W. Lineaweaver,et al.  Reconstruction of the upper extremity with multiple microvascular transplants: analysis of method, cost, and complications. , 1989 .

[11]  M. Urist,et al.  Conventional TRAM flap versus free microsurgical TRAM flap for immediate breast reconstruction. , 1989, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[12]  Jurkiewicz Mj Reconstructive surgery of the cervical esophagus. , 1984 .

[13]  N. Georgiade,et al.  Comparison of free flaps with pedicled flaps for coverage of defects of the leg or foot. , 1977, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.