Problems and Issues Relating to IT Investment Evaluation: Experiences from Scottish and Benelux Studies

Despite the growing number of IT investment evaluation methods and approaches, many organizations are still experiencing difficulties with this complex and sophisticated area. Within an environment of increasing competitiveness, pressures to reduce overheads as well as the introduction of new working practices, companies are turning to new IT investments in order to survive in uncertain and volatile markets. One sector that is experiencing such pressures is the financial services sector that is undergoing fundamental changes in terms of its structure, products and working practices, in which the investment in new IT has been a key enabling factor. This paper will report on initial findings from on-going research that has been conducted within the Benelux and Scottish financial service sectors in which the process of IT investment evaluation was critically evaluated from the perspectives of: key stakeholders, evaluation processes, evaluation criteria and project descriptions and champions. A comparison between the Benelux and Scottish financial sectors is made. The research confirms earlier research results regarding requirements to evaluation methods; however, it also identifies the concept of ‘power’ and power behaviour as a dominant factor regarding the actual use of evaluation methods. Capturing the concept of power in rational decision-making is identified as the next challenge in IT evaluation research.

[1]  Joan A. Ballantine,et al.  Information systems/technology evaluation practices: evidence from UK organizations , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[2]  Tom Renkema Boekbespreking Farbey, B.; Land, F.; Targett, D.: how to assess your IT investment, a study of methods and practice (Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1993) , 1994 .

[3]  J. Ward,et al.  Evaluation and realisation of IS/IT benefits: an empirical study of current practice , 1996 .

[4]  Mark C. Paulk,et al.  The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process , 1994 .

[5]  Egon Berghout,et al.  Methodologies for information systems investment evaluation at the proposal stage: a comparative review , 1997, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[6]  Philip Powell,et al.  Information Technology Evaluation: Is It Different? , 1992 .

[7]  Frank F. Land,et al.  Moving IS evaluation forward: learning themes and research issues , 1999, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  G. Vickers The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making , 1995 .

[9]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[10]  Egon Berghout Evaluation of Information System Proposals - Design of a decision support method , 1997 .

[11]  Brian Wilson,et al.  Systems: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications , 1990 .

[12]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[13]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Evaluating Information Technology investments: research findings and reappraisal , 1992, Inf. Syst. J..

[14]  Guy Fitzgerald,et al.  Evaluating information systems projects: a multidimensional approach , 1998, J. Inf. Technol..