C1 Pedicle Screws Versus C1 Lateral Mass Screws: Comparisons of Pullout Strengths and Biomechanical Stabilities

Study Design. In vitro biomechanical study. Objective. To compare the pullout strengths and the biomechanical stabilities afforded by C1 lateral mass screws and C1 pedicle screws using bicortical and unicortical fixation techniques. Summary of Background Data. Posterior screw fixation techniques in the atlas including C1 lateral mass screw and C1 pedicle screw. The shortcomings of C1 lateral mass screw technique and potential risks of bicortical fixation method were recently described; C1 pedicle screw technique with unicortical fixation might overcome these anatomic and clinical drawbacks. However, it is unknown whether the biomechanical characteristics of unicortical C1 pedicle screw are comparable with that of bicortical C1 lateral mass screw. Methods. Bicortical or unicortical C1 pedicle screws and C1 lateral mass screws were inserted into 12 adult fresh human C1 specimens. Pullout strength was evaluated using a material testing machine. The construct’s stability of bicortical C1 lateral mass screws or unicortical C1 pedicle screws incorporating unicortical C2 pedicle screws was compared with bilateral transarticular screws using another 6 fresh cervical cadaver spines. Pullout strength and biomechanical stability differences were compared statistically. Results. Bicortical C1 pedicle screws provided the biggest pullout strength (1757.0 ± 318.7 N) of all 4 methods, whereas unicortical C1 lateral mass screws provided the weakest(794.5 ± 314.8 N). However, there were no statistically significant differences between bicortical C1 lateral mass screws (1243.8 ± 350.0 N) and unicortical C1 pedicle screws (1192.5 ± 172.6 N). Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference of biomechanical construct stability between unicortical C1 pedicle screw-rod constructs and bicortical C1 lateral mass screw-rod constructs. Conclusion. C1 pedicle screws are stiffer than C1 lateral mass screws. Unicortical C1 pedicle screw provided the same pullout resistance and three-dimensional stability as bicortical C1 lateral mass fixation. Although lateral mass screw placement into C1 requires bicortical purchase, pedicle screw insertion into the atlas only requires unicortical fixation.

[1]  Robert K. Eastlack,et al.  C1 Anatomy and Dimensions Relative to Lateral Mass Screw Placement , 2007, Spine.

[2]  D. Riew,et al.  The Feasibility of Inserting Atlas Lateral Mass Screws via the Posterior Arch , 2006, Spine.

[3]  C. Puttlitz,et al.  Constructs Incorporating Intralaminar C2 Screws Provide Rigid Stability for Atlantoaxial Fixation , 2005, Spine.

[4]  S. Zhong,et al.  Anatomic Considerations for the Pedicle Screw Placement in the First Cervical Vertebra , 2005, Spine.

[5]  S. Lee,et al.  Posterior atlantoaxial transpedicular screw and plate fixation. Technical note. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[6]  N. Crawford,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of C1-2 posterior fixation techniques. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[7]  V. Goel,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Two Stabilization Techniques of the Atlantoaxial Joints: Transarticular Screw Fixation versus Screw and Rod Fixation , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[8]  A. Goel,et al.  Re: Tan M, Wang H, Wang Y, et al: Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass. Spine. 2003; 28:888-95. , 2004, Spine.

[9]  Michael Y. Wang,et al.  CADAVERIC MORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS FOR ATLANTAL LATERAL MASS SCREW PLACEMENT , 2004, Neurosurgery.

[10]  M. Yaszemski,et al.  The use of C1 lateral mass fixation in the cervical spine , 2004 .

[11]  Yin Dong,et al.  Posterior Screw Placement on the Lateral Mass of Atlas: An Anatomic Study , 2004, Spine.

[12]  T. J. Lim,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of anterior and posterior stabilization methods in atlantoaxial instability. , 2004, Journal of neurosurgery.

[13]  M. Yaszemski,et al.  Anatomic Relationship of the Internal Carotid Artery to the C1 Vertebra: A Case Report of Cervical Reconstruction for Chordoma and Pilot Study to Assess the Risk of Screw Fixation of the Atlas , 2003, Spine.

[14]  Ping Yi,et al.  Morphometric Evaluation of Screw Fixation in Atlas via Posterior Arch and Lateral Mass , 2003, Spine.

[15]  Atul Goel,et al.  Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: a report of 160 treated patients. , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[16]  Jeffrey C Lotz,et al.  Biomechanical Testing of Posterior Atlantoaxial Fixation Techniques , 2002, Spine.

[17]  A. Goel.  C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation with rigid cantilever beam construct: case report and technical note. , 2002, Neurosurgery.

[18]  Lutz Claes,et al.  Posterior Atlantoaxial Fixation: Biomechanical In Vitro Comparison of Six Different Techniques , 2002, Spine.

[19]  D. Resnick,et al.  Anatomic Suitability of the C1-C2 Complex for Pedicle Screw Fixation , 2002, Spine.

[20]  P. Mummaneni,et al.  Atlantal lateral mass screws for posterior spinal reconstruction: technical note and case series. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.

[21]  J. P. Johnson,et al.  Posterior atlantoaxial stabilization: new alternative to C1-2 transarticular screws. , 2002, Neurosurgical focus.

[22]  J. Harms,et al.  Posterior C1–C2 Fusion With Polyaxial Screw and Rod Fixation , 2001, Spine.

[23]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical Comparison of Five Different Atlantoaxial Posterior Fixation Techniques , 2000, Spine.

[24]  C. Petersilge,et al.  Morphologic Considerations of C2 Isthmus Dimensions for the Placement of Transarticular Screws , 2000, Spine.

[25]  T. Mittlmeier,et al.  Biomechanical Assessment of Transoral Plate Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability , 2000, Spine.

[26]  R. Yeasting,et al.  The optimal transarticular c1-2 screw length and the location of the hypoglossal nerve. , 2000, Surgical neurology.

[27]  Crockard Ha,et al.  Peroperative determination of safe superior transarticular screw trajectory through the lateral mass. , 1999 .

[28]  Y. Aydın,et al.  Posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[29]  B Y Jun,et al.  Anatomic Study for Ideal and Safe Posterior C1‐C2 Transarticular Screw Fixation , 1998, Spine.

[30]  N. Wright,et al.  Vertebral artery injury in C1-2 transarticular screw fixation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons. , 1998, Journal of neurosurgery.

[31]  N. Wright,et al.  Vertebral artery injury in C1-2 transarticular screw fixation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves , 1998 .

[32]  H. Crockard,et al.  Variation of the groove in the axis vertebra for the vertebral artery. Implications for instrumentation. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[33]  H. Crockard,et al.  Variation of the Groove in the Axis Vertebra for the Vertebral Artery , 1997 .

[34]  H A Crockard,et al.  Radiological and anatomical evaluation of the atlantoaxial transarticular screw fixation technique. , 1997, Journal of neurosurgery.

[35]  C L Branch,et al.  Arteriovenous fistula as a complication of C1-2 transarticular screw fixation. Case report and review of the literature. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[36]  C. Dickman,et al.  The anatomical suitability of the C1-2 complex for transarticular screw fixation. , 1996, Journal of neurosurgery.

[37]  N. Ebraheim,et al.  Anatomic Consideration of C2 Pedicle Screw Placement , 1996, Spine.

[38]  M. Bernstein,et al.  C1-C2 posterior cervical fusion: long-term evaluation of results and efficacy. , 1995, Neurosurgery.

[39]  C. Dickman,et al.  Surgical management of atlantoaxial nonunions. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[40]  R. Yeasting,et al.  Morphology of the Second Cervical Vertebra and the Posterior Projection of the C2 Pedicle Axis , 1995, Spine.

[41]  Brian J. Doherty,et al.  The Quantitative Anatomy of the Atlas , 1994, Spine.

[42]  C. Dickman,et al.  Posterior atlantoaxial facet screw fixation. , 1993, Journal of neurosurgery.

[43]  John A. Wilson,et al.  Atlanto-axial stabilization with posterior transarticular screw fixation: technical description and report of 22 cases. , 1993, Neurosurgery.

[44]  G. Kotzar,et al.  A Biomechanical Analysis of Atlantoaxial Stabilization Methods Using a Bovine Model C1/C2 Fixation Analysis , 1993, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[45]  F. Magerl,et al.  Primary posterior fusion C1/2 in odontoid fractures: indications, technique, and results of transarticular screw fixation. , 1992, Journal of spinal disorders.

[46]  M M Panjabi,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Four Different Posterior Atlantoaxial Fixation Techniques , 1992, Spine.

[47]  M. Aebi,et al.  Atlanto-axial fusion with transarticular screw fixation. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[48]  W Rauschning,et al.  Anatomic and Biomechanical Assessment of Transarticular Screw Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability , 1991, Spine.

[49]  B. Son,et al.  NSJ-Spine january 2004 , 2006 .

[50]  J. Štulík,et al.  [Harms technique of C1-C2 fixation with polyaxial screws and rods]. , 2005, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[51]  A. Goel,et al.  Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation , 2005, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[52]  H. Crockard,et al.  Peroperative determination of safe superior transarticular screw trajectory through the lateral mass. , 1999, Spine.

[53]  F. Magerl,et al.  Stable Posterior Fusion of the Atlas and Axis by Transarticular Screw Fixation , 1987 .