MyEmpowerNet.gov

A national web-based system called MyEmpowerNet.gov is proposed to empower citizens to become more involved in public decision making and to increase social capital. The system would be designed to allow citizens more voice in bureaucratic decision making on topics as diverse as the management of national forests to changes in local zoning ordinances. Each citizen would have a personal site on MyEmpowerNet.gov. The system would inform users of current and impending public federal, state, or local participation processes of potential interest to them. The system would help citizens organize their participation-related information. It is proposed that a new federal organization, titled the U.S. EmpowerNet Administration (USEA), be established to develop and manage the system and facilitate public participation nationwide. Major social and information science research issues will challenge the developers of My EmpowerNet.gov.

[1]  D. Yates,et al.  Bureaucratic Democracy: The Search for Democracy and Efficiency in American Government , 1983 .

[2]  John Sillince,et al.  A Theory of Planning , 1986 .

[3]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[4]  Ann Swidler,et al.  Habits of the Heart , 1986 .

[5]  I. Mitroff.  The age of paradox , 1994 .

[6]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  Everyday life's constraints on citizenship in the United States , 1998 .

[7]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  James Madison on Cyberdemocracy , 2002 .

[8]  Lori M. Weber,et al.  Who Participates and Why? , 2003 .

[9]  Sam Burns,et al.  Forest Service-Community Relationship Building: Recommendations , 2000 .

[10]  James Flynn,et al.  Who holds the stakes? A case study of stakeholder identification at two nuclear weapons production sites , 1995 .

[11]  Juliet B. Schor,et al.  The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline Of Leisure , 1991 .

[12]  S. Verba,et al.  The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations, An Analytic Study , 1964 .

[13]  Ronald A. Heifetz,et al.  Leadership Without Easy Answers , 1996 .

[14]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT: OPEN PROCESSES FOR REACHING DECISIONS ABOUT THE FUTURE USES OF CONTAMINATED SITES FINAL REPORT , 1993 .

[15]  B. Tonn,et al.  Community Networks or Networked Communities? , 2001 .

[16]  Stuart W. Shulman,et al.  Electronic rulemaking: a public participation research agenda for the social sciences , 2003 .

[17]  Paul G. Lewis,et al.  Municipal Institutions and Voter Turnout in Local Elections , 2003 .

[18]  Bruce Tonn,et al.  A Framework for Understanding and Improving Environmental Decision Making , 2000 .

[19]  C. Toregas.  The Politics of E‐Gov: The Upcoming Struggle for Redefining Civic Engagement , 2001 .

[20]  Martin Schweitzer,et al.  Measuring the success of public participation on environmental restoration and waste management activities in the U.S. Department of Energy , 1998 .

[21]  H. Fineberg,et al.  Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society , 1996 .

[22]  Seth Tuler,et al.  Designing an Analytic-Deliberative Process for Environmental Health Policy Making: An Illustration from the U.S. Nuclear Weapons Complex , 1999 .

[23]  J. C. Thomas.  Public Participation in Public Decisions: New Skills and Strategies for Public Managers , 1995 .

[24]  Zhong-Ren Peng,et al.  Internet GIS for Public Participation , 2001 .

[25]  K. A. Hill,et al.  Cyberpolitics: Citizen Activism in the Age of the Internet , 1998 .

[26]  S. Stehman,et al.  Public perceptions of the USDA Forest Service public participation process , 2001 .

[27]  Ray Oldenburg,et al.  The great good place : cafés, coffee shops, community centers, beauty parlors, general stores, bars, hangouts, and how they get you through the day , 1991 .

[28]  Lawrence K. Grossman.  The Electronic Republic: Reshaping Democracy in the Information Age , 1995 .