Bounding the Plausibility of Physical Theories in a Device-Independent Setting via Hypothesis Testing

The device-independent approach to physics is one where conclusions about physical systems (and hence of Nature) are drawn directly and solely from the observed correlations between measurement outcomes. This operational approach to physics arose as a byproduct of Bell’s seminal work to distinguish, via a Bell test, quantum correlations from the set of correlations allowed by local-hidden-variable theories. In practice, since one can only perform a finite number of experimental trials, deciding whether an empirical observation is compatible with some class of physical theories will have to be carried out via the task of hypothesis testing. In this paper, we show that the prediction-based-ratio method—initially developed for performing a hypothesis test of local-hidden-variable theories—can equally well be applied to test many other classes of physical theories, such as those constrained only by the nonsignaling principle, and those that are constrained to produce any of the outer approximation to the quantum set of correlations due to Navascués-Pironio-Acín. We numerically simulate Bell tests using hypothetical nonlocal sources of correlations to illustrate the applicability of the method in both the independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) scenario and the non-i.i.d. scenario. As a further application, we demonstrate how this method allows us to unveil an apparent violation of the nonsignaling conditions in certain experimental data collected in a Bell test. This, in turn, highlights the importance of the randomization of measurement settings, as well as a consistency check of the nonsignaling conditions in a Bell test.

[1]  J. Bell,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Preface to the first edition , 2004 .

[2]  T. Fritz,et al.  Local orthogonality as a multipartite principle for quantum correlations , 2012, Nature Communications.

[3]  A. Acín,et al.  Almost quantum correlations , 2014, Nature Communications.

[4]  Le Phuc Thinh,et al.  Randomness Extraction from Bell Violation with Continuous Parametric Down-Conversion. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[5]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[6]  S. Popescu,et al.  Quantum nonlocality as an axiom , 1994 .

[7]  V. Scarani,et al.  Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[8]  W Dür,et al.  Experimental violation of multipartite Bell inequalities with trapped ions. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[9]  Jean-Daniel Bancal,et al.  Device-independent entanglement quantification and related applications. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[10]  Mohamed Bourennane,et al.  Avoiding apparent signaling in Bell tests for quantitative applications , 2018, 1801.05739.

[11]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[12]  Yang Liu,et al.  Test of Local Realism into the Past without Detection and Locality Loopholes. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[13]  Valerio Scarani,et al.  All pure bipartite entangled states can be self-tested , 2016, Nature Communications.

[14]  E. Knill,et al.  A strong loophole-free test of local realism , 2015, 2016 Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (CLEO).

[15]  A. Falcon Physics I.1 , 2018 .

[16]  Daniele C. Struppa,et al.  Quantum Theory: A Two-Time Success Story , 2013 .

[17]  Adrian Kent,et al.  No signaling and quantum key distribution. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[18]  Stephanie Wehner,et al.  The Quantum Moment Problem and Bounds on Entangled Multi-prover Games , 2008, 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[19]  Yang Liu,et al.  Device-independent quantum random-number generation , 2018, Nature.

[20]  Yeong-Cherng Liang,et al.  Bell inequalities with three ternary-outcome measurements - from theory to experiments , 2015 .

[21]  Koon Tong Goh,et al.  Geometry of the set of quantum correlations , 2017, 1710.05892.

[22]  C. Monroe,et al.  Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality with efficient detection , 2001, Nature.

[23]  Ericka Stricklin-Parker,et al.  Ann , 2005 .

[24]  Valerio Scarani,et al.  THE DEVICE-INDEPENDENT OUTLOOK ON QUANTUM PHYSICS , 2013 .

[25]  A. Shimony,et al.  Proposed Experiment to Test Local Hidden Variable Theories. , 1969 .

[26]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Arbitrarily small amount of measurement independence is sufficient to manifest quantum nonlocality. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[27]  Michael Stingl,et al.  PENLAB: A MATLAB solver for nonlinear semidefinite optimization , 2013 .

[28]  A. Bednorz Analysis of assumptions of recent tests of local realism , 2015, 1511.03509.

[29]  N. Gisin,et al.  From Bell's theorem to secure quantum key distribution. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[30]  T. Jennewein,et al.  Experimental three-photon quantum nonlocality under strict locality conditions , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[31]  Adrian Kent,et al.  Private randomness expansion with untrusted devices , 2010, 1011.4474.

[32]  C. Ross Found , 1869, The Dental register.

[33]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Bell violation using entangled photons without the fair-sampling assumption , 2012, Nature.

[34]  Tony Leggett,et al.  Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics: Collected Papers on Quantum Philosophy , 1988 .

[35]  S. Wehner,et al.  Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres , 2015, Nature.

[36]  Wim van Dam Implausible consequences of superstrong nonlocality , 2012, Natural Computing.

[37]  Jeffrey T. Leek,et al.  Statistics: P values are just the tip of the iceberg , 2015, Nature.

[38]  Emal Pasarly Time , 2011, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.

[39]  N. Gisin,et al.  Violation of Bell Inequalities by Photons More Than 10 km Apart , 1998, quant-ph/9806043.

[40]  Guillaume Adenier,et al.  Test of the no‐signaling principle in the Hensen loophole‐free CHSH experiment , 2016, 1606.00784.

[41]  A. J. Short,et al.  Quantum nonlocality and beyond: limits from nonlocal computation. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[42]  N. Lazar,et al.  The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose , 2016 .

[43]  Aaron J. Miller,et al.  Detection-loophole-free test of quantum nonlocality, and applications. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[44]  Umesh Vazirani,et al.  Fully device-independent quantum key distribution. , 2012, 1210.1810.

[45]  Jean-Daniel Bancal,et al.  Device-independent Point Estimation from Finite Data , 2017, 1705.09245.

[46]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[47]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Event-Ready Bell Test Using Entangled Atoms Simultaneously Closing Detection and Locality Loopholes. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[48]  Shin-Liang Chen,et al.  Exploring the framework of assemblage moment matrices and its applications in device-independent characterizations , 2018, Physical Review A.

[49]  H. Weinfurter,et al.  Violation of Bell's Inequality under Strict Einstein Locality Conditions , 1998, quant-ph/9810080.

[50]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Exploring the Limits of Quantum Nonlocality with Entangled Photons , 2015, 1506.01649.

[51]  Peter Grünwald,et al.  The statistical strength of nonlocality proofs , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[52]  Emanuel Knill,et al.  Efficient quantification of experimental evidence against local realism , 2013, 1303.7464.

[53]  Marian Kupczynski,et al.  Is Einsteinian no-signalling violated in Bell tests? , 2017, 1709.00708.

[54]  Alejo Salles,et al.  Macroscopically local correlations can violate information causality. , 2010, Nature communications.

[55]  Andrew Chi-Chih Yao,et al.  Self testing quantum apparatus , 2004, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[56]  A. Acín,et al.  Bounding the set of quantum correlations. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[57]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Tripartite quantum state violating the hidden-influence constraints , 2013, 1304.1812.

[58]  A. Winter,et al.  Information causality as a physical principle , 2009, Nature.

[59]  Pavel Sekatski,et al.  Certifying the Building Blocks of Quantum Computers from Bell's Theorem. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[60]  A. Acín,et al.  A convergent hierarchy of semidefinite programs characterizing the set of quantum correlations , 2008, 0803.4290.

[61]  G. Roger,et al.  Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying Analyzers , 1982 .

[62]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Family of Bell-like Inequalities as Device-Independent Witnesses for Entanglement Depth. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[63]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Quantum non-locality based on finite-speed causal influences leads to superluminal signalling , 2011, Nature Physics.

[64]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Optimal bell tests do not require maximally entangled states. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[65]  J. Bell On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox , 1964 .

[66]  Ekert,et al.  Quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem. , 1991, Physical review letters.

[67]  S. Massar,et al.  Nonlocal correlations as an information-theoretic resource , 2004, quant-ph/0404097.

[68]  Christian Kurtsiefer,et al.  Approaching Tsirelson's Bound in a Photon Pair Experiment. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[69]  M. Navascués,et al.  A glance beyond the quantum model , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[70]  H. Buhrman,et al.  Limit on nonlocality in any world in which communication complexity is not trivial. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[71]  R. Lathe Phd by thesis , 1988, Nature.

[72]  V. Scarani,et al.  Testing the dimension of Hilbert spaces. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[73]  S. Wehner,et al.  Bell Nonlocality , 2013, 1303.2849.

[74]  Daniel Rohrlich,et al.  PR-Box Correlations Have No Classical Limit , 2014, 1407.8530.

[75]  Richard D. Gill Time, Finite Statistics, and Bell's Fifth Position , 2003 .

[76]  Miguel Navascués,et al.  Robust and versatile black-box certification of quantum devices. , 2014, Physical review letters.

[77]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Classical command of quantum systems , 2013, Nature.

[78]  Shin-Liang Chen,et al.  Natural Framework for Device-Independent Quantification of Quantum Steerability, Measurement Incompatibility, and Self-Testing. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[79]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Random numbers certified by Bell’s theorem , 2009, Nature.

[80]  H. Bechmann-Pasquinucci,et al.  Quantum cryptography , 2001, quant-ph/0101098.

[81]  Emanuel Knill,et al.  Statistical strength of experiments to reject local realism with photon pairs and inefficient detectors , 2010, 1001.1750.

[82]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[83]  Emanuel Knill,et al.  Asymptotically optimal data analysis for rejecting local realism , 2011 .

[84]  M. T. Cunha,et al.  Exclusivity principle forbids sets of correlations larger than the quantum set. , 2013, 1306.6289.

[85]  Roger Colbeck,et al.  Quantum And Relativistic Protocols For Secure Multi-Party Computation , 2009, 0911.3814.

[86]  Regina Nuzzo,et al.  Scientific method: Statistical errors , 2014, Nature.