A Framework for Rigorously Identifying Research Gaps in Qualitative Literature Reviews

Identifying research gaps is a fundamental goal of literature reviewing. While it is widely acknowledged that literature reviews should identify research gaps, there are no methodological guidelines for how to identify research gaps in qualitative literature reviews ensuring rigor and replicability. Our study addresses this gap and proposes a framework that should help scholars in this endeavor without stifling creativity. To develop the framework we thoroughly analyze the state-of-the-art procedure of identifying research gaps in 40 recent literature reviews using a grounded theory approach. Based on the data, we subsequently derive a framework for identifying research gaps in qualitative literature reviews and demonstrate its application with an example. Our results provide a modus operandi for identifying research gaps, thus enabling scholars to conduct literature reviews more rigorously, effectively, and efficiently in the future.

[1]  Michael R. Wade,et al.  A Comprehensive Review and Synthesis of Open Source Research , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Tejaswini Herath,et al.  A review and analysis of deterrence theory in the IS security literature: making sense of the disparate findings , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Carl Auerbach,et al.  Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis , 2003 .

[4]  Anand Jeyaraj,et al.  A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[5]  Manju K. Ahuja.  Women in the information technology profession: a literature review, synthesis and research agenda , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  A. Eagly,et al.  Using research syntheses to plan future research. , 1994 .

[7]  Angelika Dimoka,et al.  On the Use of Neuropyhsiological Tools in IS Research: Developing a Research Agenda for NeuroIS , 2012, MIS Q..

[8]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Joshua C. Collins,et al.  The Handbook of Scholarly Writing and Publishing , 2012 .

[10]  N. Hoffart.  Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[11]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems innovation among organizations , 1994 .

[12]  Janek Richter,et al.  Towards mindful case study research in IS: a critical analysis of the past ten years , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[14]  Andrea Bergmann.  Doing A Literature Review Releasing The Social Science Research Imagination , 2016 .

[15]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  Embodiment and presence in virtual worlds: a review , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[16]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process , 2009, ECIS.

[17]  Arlene Fink,et al.  Conducting research literature reviews : from the internet to paper , 2014 .

[18]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  The Neglected Continent of IS Research: A Research Agenda for Sub-Saharan Africa , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  David S. Preston,et al.  Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications , 2010, MIS Q..

[20]  Graham Pervan,et al.  A critical analysis of decision support systems research , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[21]  Blake Ives,et al.  Review: IT-Dependent Strategic Initiatives and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature , 2005, MIS Q..

[22]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Writing a literature review , 2013 .

[23]  Kieran Conboy,et al.  Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[24]  Mary Tate,et al.  A Descriptive Literature Review and Classification of Cloud Computing Research , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW , 2000 .

[26]  N. Eberhardt.  Conducting Research Literature Reviews From The Internet To Paper , 2016 .

[27]  Saonee Sarker,et al.  ICT innovation in emerging economies: a review of the existing literature and a framework for future research , 2013, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  A review of the IT outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[29]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development , 2012, MIS Q..

[30]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Information Systems Strategy and Strategy-as-Practice: A joint agenda , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[31]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations , 2014, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[33]  Ali Sunyaev,et al.  Determinant factors of cloud-sourcing decisions: reflecting on the IT outsourcing literature in the era of cloud computing , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[34]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Critical themes in electronic commerce research: a meta-analysis , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[35]  Karen A Robinson,et al.  Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[36]  France Bélanger,et al.  Digitizing Government Interactions with Constituents: An Historical Review of E-Government Research in Information Systems , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  The diffusion and use of institutional theory: a cross-disciplinary longitudinal literature survey , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[38]  James Backhouse,et al.  Current directions in IS security research: towards socio‐organizational perspectives , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[39]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Review: Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An Integrative Model of IT Business Value , 2004, MIS Q..

[40]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict , 2006, MIS Q..

[41]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design - The Case for Incentive Alignment , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Information technology and the transformation of industries: three research perspectives , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Guido Schryen,et al.  Revisiting IS business value research: what we already know, what we still need to know, and how we can get there , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[44]  C. Hart.  Doing a literature review: releasing the social science research imagination. , 1998 .

[45]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[46]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Research Commentary - The Design, Use, and Consequences of Virtual Processes , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[47]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations? , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[50]  J. Gosby.  MEDIA REVIEWS: Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd Edition by A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Sage Publications, , 2000 .

[51]  Nittaya Campbell,et al.  Improving The Writing Of Literature Reviews Through A Literature Integration Exercise , 2006 .

[52]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Modern information technology in an old workforce: Toward a strategic research agenda , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Business process outsourcing studies: a critical review and research directions , 2011, J. Inf. Technol..

[54]  Thanos Papadopoulos,et al.  Information systems strategy: Past, present, future? , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[55]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  E-Commerce Product Recommendation Agents: Use, Characteristics, and Impact , 2007, MIS Q..

[56]  Elfi Furtmueller,et al.  Using grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literature , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  State of the information privacy literature: where are we now and where should we go? , 2011 .

[58]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Grounded theory research: literature reviewing and reflexivity. , 2007, Journal of advanced nursing.

[59]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pluralist action research: a review of the information systems literature * , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[60]  H. Cooper.  Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews , 1988 .

[61]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Research Agenda for Trust in Online Environments , 2008, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future: Writing a Literature Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[63]  Yair Levy,et al.  A Systems Approach to Conduct an Effective Literature Review in Support of Information Systems Research , 2006, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[64]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[65]  Robert E. Crossler,et al.  Privacy in the Digital Age: A Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems , 2011, MIS Q..

[66]  Shahper Vodanovich,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Natives and Ubiquitous Information Systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  Elena Maceviciute,et al.  Review of: Einspruch, Eric L. An introductory guide to SPSS® for Windows®. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2005 , 2006, Inf. Res..