Design of the helium cooled lithium lead breeding blanket in CEA: from TBM to DEMO

The helium cooled lithium lead (HCLL) blanket concept was originally developed in CEA at the beginning of 2000: it is one of the two European blanket concepts to be tested in ITER in the form of a test blanket module (TBM) and one of the four blanket concepts currently being considered for the DEMOnstration reactor that will follow ITER. The TBM is a highly optimized component for the ITER environment that will provide crucial information for the development of the DEMO blanket, but its design needs to be adapted to the DEMO reactor. With respect to the TBM design, reduction of the steel content in the breeding zone (BZ) is sought in order to maximize tritium breeding reactions. Different options are being studied, with the potential of reaching tritium breeding ratio (TBR) values up to 1.21. At the same time, the design of the back supporting structure (BSS), which is a DEMO specific component that has to support the blanket modules inside the vacuum vessel (VV), is ongoing with the aim of maximizing the shielding power and minimizing pumping power. This implies a re-engineering of the modules' attachment system. Design changes however, will have an impact on the manufacturing and assembly sequences that are being developed for the HCLL-TBM. Due to the differences in joint configurations, thicknesses to be welded, heat dissipation and the various technical constraints related to the accessibility of the welding tools and implementation of non-destructive examination (NDE), the manufacturing procedure should be adapted and optimized for DEMO design. Laser welding instead of TIG could be an option to reduce distortions. The time-of-flight diffraction (TOFD) technique is being investigated for NDE. Finally, essential information expected from the HCLL-TBM program that will be needed to finalize the DEMO design is discussed.

[1]  Jose Galabert,et al.  The European ITER Test Blanket Modules: Current status of fabrication technologies development and a way forward , 2015 .

[2]  Rosaria Villari,et al.  Comparison over the nuclear analysis of the HCLL blanket for the European DEMO , 2016 .

[3]  Yves Poitevin,et al.  Design activities toward the achievement of the conceptual phase of the EU-TBM sets , 2016 .

[4]  Rosaria Villari,et al.  Neutronic performance issues of the breeding blanket options for the European DEMO fusion power plant , 2016 .

[5]  Jean-Charles Jaboulay,et al.  Nuclear analysis of the HCLL blanket for the European DEMO , 2017 .

[6]  J.-F. Salavy,et al.  Assessment of design limits and criteria requirements for Eurofer structures in TBM components , 2011 .

[7]  Mikio Enoeda,et al.  Overview of the ITER TBM Program , 2012 .

[8]  T. Franke,et al.  Overview of the design approach and prioritization of R&D activities towards an EU DEMO , 2016 .

[9]  L. V. Boccaccini,et al.  Objectives and status of EUROfusion DEMO blanket studies , 2016 .

[10]  E. Diegele,et al.  Materials and design of the European DEMO blankets , 2004 .

[11]  Giuseppe Vella,et al.  On the influence of the supporting frame on the nuclear response of the Helium-Cooled Lithium Lead Test Blanket Module for ITER , 2006 .

[12]  P. Calderoni,et al.  Technologies and modelling issues for tritium processing in the European Test Blanket Systems and perspectives for DEMO , 2014 .

[13]  P. Calderoni,et al.  The F4E programme on nuclear data validation and nuclear instrumentation techniques for TBM in ITER , 2014 .

[14]  D. P. Luigi,et al.  DEMO and fusion power plant conceptual studies in Europe , 2006 .

[15]  J.-F. Salavy,et al.  HCLL TBM design status and development , 2011 .

[16]  J. P. Friconneau,et al.  Progress and Challenges of the ITER TBM Program from the IO Perspective , 2016 .

[17]  P. Calderoni,et al.  Progresses and challenges in supporting activities toward a license to operate European TBM systems in ITER , 2014 .

[18]  E. Diegele,et al.  The European breeding blankets development and the test strategy in ITER , 2005 .