Interpersonal Problems and personality characteristics: Psychometric studies of the Swedish version of the IIP

Abstract The Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP) is a self-report instrument, designed to measure interpersonal distress. The properties of the Swedish IIP-version were studied in three different samples: non-psychiatric subjects, psychiatric out-patients, and psychiatric in-patients. The Swedish data were compared with Horowitz' normative American IIP-data. The patterns of correlation between the Swedish IIP and personality characteristics as assessed by personality inventory, self-report measures of alexithymia, and interview-based psychodynamic interviews were investigated. The results indicate that the Swedish IIP version possesses acceptable internal consistency, and construct validity in terms of its circumplex properties, and that it manifests meaningful patterns of correspondence with the self-report and interview-based instruments, developed within other theoretical frameworks, for assessing personality characteristics. For example, the pattern of correlations between the IIP and the alexithymia measures suggests alexithymia to be associated with problems of intimacy avoidance.

[1]  G J Taylor,et al.  The Twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. , 1994, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[2]  M. J. Lynch,et al.  Biological Bases of Sensation Seeking, Impulsivity, and Anxiety , 1984 .

[3]  M. Åsberg,et al.  Markers for vulnerability to psychopathology: Temperament traits associated with platelet MAO activity , 1987, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[4]  J. Mezquita.  FOUR YEARS OF INDUSTRIAL THERAPY AT MAPPERLEY HOSPITAL: A SURVEY , 1973, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[5]  P. Sifneos.  A reconsideration of psychodynamic mechanisms in psychosomatic symptom formation in view of recent clinical observations. , 1974, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[6]  RM Weinryb,et al.  Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile , 1991, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[7]  H. Gough.  Theory and measurement of socialization. , 1960 .

[8]  M. Åsberg,et al.  Stability over time of character assessment using a psychodynamic instrument and personality inventories , 1992, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[9]  M. Eysenck,et al.  Personality and Individual Differences: A Natural Science Approach , 1985 .

[10]  S. Briggs,et al.  The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales , 1986 .

[11]  Edward G. Carmines,et al.  Reliability and Validity Assessment , 1979 .

[12]  L. Horowitz,et al.  Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[13]  Timothy Leary,et al.  Interpersonal diagnosis of personality : a functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation , 1958 .

[14]  L. Benjamin.  Interpersonal Diagnosis and Treatment of Personality Disorders , 1993 .

[15]  P. Sifneos,et al.  Alexithymia: concept and measurement. , 1979, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[16]  R. Brislin.  The wording and translation of research instruments. , 1986 .

[17]  M. Åsberg,et al.  The Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile. I. Validity and dimensionality , 1991, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[18]  L. Benjamin.  Structural analysis of social behavior. , 1974 .

[19]  J. H. Steiger,et al.  Evaluating circumplexity in personality data. , 1981 .

[20]  P E Sifneos,et al.  The prevalence of 'alexithymic' characteristics in psychosomatic patients. , 1973, Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.

[21]  J. Berry,et al.  Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research , 1986 .

[22]  H. Eysenck.  Biological Basis of Personality , 1963, Nature.

[23]  R. Bagby,et al.  The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. , 1994, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[24]  H Krystal,et al.  Alexithymia and the effectiveness of psychoanalytic treatment. , 1982, International journal of psychoanalytic psychotherapy.

[25]  H. Sjöbring.  Personality structure and development. A model and its application. , 1973, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[26]  A. Buss,et al.  An inventory for assessing different kinds of hostility. , 1957, Journal of consulting psychology.

[27]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .

[28]  S. Nowicki,et al.  An Examination of the Leary Circumplex through the Interpersonal Check List , 1986 .

[29]  L. Horowitz,et al.  The Capacity to Describe other People Clearly: A Predictor of Interpersonal Problems in Brief Dynamic Psychotherapy , 1992 .

[30]  K. Bartholomew,et al.  Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Construction of circumplex scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. , 1990, Journal of personality assessment.

[32]  M. Åsberg,et al.  The Karolinska Psychodynamic Profile. II. Interdisciplinary and cross‐cultural reliability , 1991, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[33]  M. Åsberg,et al.  The concept of alexithymia: an empirical study using psychodynamic ratings and self‐reports , 1992, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[34]  D. Kiesler.  The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. , 1983 .