Exploring factors affecting on-farm renewable energy adoption in Scotland using large-scale microdata

This paper uses large-scale micro data to identify key factors affecting the decision to adopt renewable energy generation (wind, solar and biomass) on farms in Scotland. We construct an integrated dataset that includes the compulsory agricultural census and farm structural survey that cover almost all farms in Scotland. In addition to farm owner demographics and farm business structures, we also assess the effect of diversification activities such as tourism and forestry, as well as the spatial, biophysical and geophysical attributes of the farms on the adoption decision. We find that diversified farms are more likely to adopt renewable energy, especially solar and biomass energy. Farms are also more likely to adopt renewable energy if they have high local demand for energy, or suitable conditions for renewable energy production. We find that biophysical factors such as the agricultural potential of farm land are important in adoption decisions. We identify adopter profiles for each type of renewable energy, and map the geographic location of potential adopters. We argue that renewable energy policy should be more integrated with farm diversification policy and farm support schemes. It should also be tailored for each type of renewable energy, for the potential adopter profiles of wind, solar and biomass energy all differ in farm characteristics and geographic distribution.

[1]  A. Bergmann,et al.  Valuing the attributes of renewable energy investments , 2006 .

[2]  Joseph Coveney,et al.  FIRTHLOGIT: Stata module to calculate bias reduction in logistic regression , 2008 .

[3]  Calliope Panoutsou,et al.  Bioenergy in Greece : Policies, diffusion framework and stakeholder interactions , 2008 .

[4]  Graham Tate,et al.  A comparison of the drivers influencing farmers' adoption of enterprises associated with renewable energy , 2012 .

[5]  Neveen Hamza,et al.  Renewable energy adoption in an ageing population: Heterogeneity in preferences for micro-generation technology adoption , 2011 .

[6]  T. Amon,et al.  Bioenergy from permanent grassland--a review: 2. Combustion. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[7]  Jamey Menard,et al.  Farmer Willingness to Grow Switchgrass for Energy Production , 2007 .

[8]  L. Sutherland,et al.  Future-proofing the farm: On-farm wind turbine development in farm business decision-making , 2014 .

[9]  D. Moran,et al.  Farm-level constraints on the domestic supply of perennial energy crops in the UK , 2008 .

[10]  Gary King,et al.  ReLogit: Rare Events Logistic Regression , 2003 .

[11]  Paavo Pelkonen,et al.  The effects of policy incentives in the adoption of willow short rotation coppice for bioenergy in Sweden , 2008 .

[12]  D. Moran,et al.  Modelling farmer uptake of perennial energy crops in the UK , 2010 .

[13]  Bohumil Frantál,et al.  Wind turbines in tourism landscapes: Czech Experience , 2011 .

[14]  Steven Ruggles,et al.  Big Microdata for Population Research , 2014, Demography.

[15]  André Faaij,et al.  Bio-energy in Europe: changing technology choices , 2006 .

[16]  Pablo del Río,et al.  Overcoming the lock-out of renewable energy technologies in Spain: The cases of wind and solar electricity , 2007 .

[17]  D. McFadden Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[18]  S. Mulholland,et al.  USE AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE SCOTTISH GOVERNMENT URBAN RURAL CLASSIFICATION , 2009 .

[19]  J. Whitaker,et al.  The impact of sustainable energy production on land use in Britain through to 2050 , 2009 .

[20]  Filippo Sgroi,et al.  Economic analysis of PV systems on buildings in Sicilian farms , 2013 .

[21]  Filippo Spertino,et al.  Economic analysis of investment in the rooftop photovoltaic systems: A long-term research in the two main markets , 2013 .

[22]  D. Horst NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies , 2007 .

[23]  Georg Heinze,et al.  A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  L. Sutherland,et al.  Patterns of attention to renewable energy in the British farming press from 1980 to 2013 , 2016 .

[25]  Gary King,et al.  Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data , 2001, Political Analysis.

[26]  Lee-Ann Sutherland,et al.  Conceptualising multi-regime interactions: The role of the agriculture sector in renewable energy transitions , 2015 .

[27]  Kevin G. Wilkinson,et al.  A comparison of the drivers influencing adoption of on-farm anaerobic digestion in Germany and Australia , 2011 .

[28]  G. Bocquého,et al.  The adoption of switchgrass and miscanthus by farmers: Impact of liquidity constraints and risk preferences , 2010 .

[29]  Developing a local house price index: the case of Aberdeen, Scotland , 2013 .

[30]  D. Firth Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates , 1993 .

[31]  Philip Jones,et al.  Assessing the potential for the uptake of on-farm anaerobic digestion for energy production in England. , 2011 .

[32]  T Amon,et al.  Bioenergy from permanent grassland--a review: 1. Biogas. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[33]  G. Fisher,et al.  Land Capability Classification for Agriculture , 1982 .