Coupling state-of-the-art supercritical fluid chromatography and mass spectrometry: from hyphenation interface optimization to high-sensitivity analysis of pharmaceutical compounds.

The recent market release of a new generation of supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) instruments compatible with state-of-the-art columns packed with sub-2μm particles (UHPSFC) has contributed to the reemergence of interest in this technology at the analytical scale. However, to ensure performance competitiveness of this technique with modern analytical standards, a robust hyphenation of UHPSFC to mass spectrometry (MS) is mandatory. UHPSFC-MS hyphenation interface should be able to manage the compressibility of the SFC mobile phase and to preserve as much as possible the chromatographic separation integrity. Although several interfaces can be envisioned, each will have noticeable effects on chromatographic fidelity, flexibility and user-friendliness. In the present study, various interface configurations were evaluated in terms of their impact on chromatographic efficiency and MS detection sensitivity. An interface including a splitter and a make-up solvent inlet was found to be the best compromise and exhibited good detection sensitivity while maintaining more than 75% of the chromatographic efficiency. This interface was also the most versatile in terms of applicable analytical conditions. In addition, an accurate model of the fluidics behavior of this interface was created for a better understanding of the influence of chromatographic settings on its mode of operation. In the second part, the most influential experimental factors affecting MS detection sensitivity were identified and optimized using a design-of-experiment approach. The application of low capillary voltage and high desolvation temperature and drying gas flow rate were required for optimal ESI ionization and nebulization processes. The detection sensitivity achieved using the maximized UHPSFC-ESI-MS/MS conditions for a mixture of basic pharmaceutical compounds showed 4- to 10-fold improvements in peak intensity compared to the best performance achieved by UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS with the same MS detector.

[1]  P. Arpino,et al.  Packed-column supercritical fluid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry , 1993 .

[2]  W. Goetzinger,et al.  Ammonia as a preferred additive in chiral and achiral applications of supercritical fluid chromatography for small, drug-like molecules. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  J. Veuthey,et al.  Contribution of various types of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry instruments to band broadening in fast analysis. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[4]  P. Arpino,et al.  Supercritical fluid chromatography—mass spectrometry coupling , 1987 .

[5]  L. T. Taylor,et al.  Packed column supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectroscopy: A review , 1997 .

[6]  J. Veuthey,et al.  Maximizing kinetic performance in supercritical fluid chromatography using state-of-the-art instruments. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  Jean W. Lee,et al.  Supercritical fluid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for fast bioanalysis of R/S-warfarin in human plasma. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[8]  D. T. Stanton,et al.  Comparison of LC/MS and SFC/MS for screening of a large and diverse library of pharmaceutically relevant compounds. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  J. Veuthey,et al.  Quantification of glucuronidated and sulfated steroids in human urine by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry , 2011, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[10]  L. T. Taylor,et al.  Supercritical fluid chromatographic resolution of water soluble isomeric carboxyl/amine terminated peptides facilitated via mobile phase water and ion pair formation. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[11]  E. Lesellier Efficiency in supercritical fluid chromatography with different superficially porous and fully porous particles ODS bonded phases. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  J. David Pinkston,et al.  Advantages and Drawbacks of Popular Supercritical Fluid Chromatography / Mass Spectrometry Interfacing Approaches—A User's Perspective , 2005 .

[13]  T. Berger,et al.  Minimizing UV noise in supercritical fluid chromatography. I. Improving back pressure regulator pressure noise. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[14]  Serge Rudaz,et al.  Coupling ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry , 2010 .

[15]  P. Sandra,et al.  Rapid method development for chiral separation in drug discovery using sample pooling and supercritical fluid chromatography-mass spectrometry. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[16]  J. Vial,et al.  Feasibility of ultra high performance supercritical neat carbon dioxide chromatography at conventional pressures. , 2011, Journal of separation science.

[17]  L. Ouyang New Correlations for Predicting the Density and Viscosity of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Under Conditions Expected in Carbon Capture and Sequestration Operations , 2011 .

[18]  Milton L. Lee,et al.  Supercritical fluid chromatography - mass spectrometry , 1983 .

[19]  James F Cuff,et al.  Greening analytical chromatography , 2010 .

[20]  T. Berger Separation of polar solutes by packed column supercritical fluid chromatography , 1997 .

[21]  T. Berger Demonstration of High Speeds with Low Pressure Drops Using 1.8 μm Particles in SFC , 2010 .

[22]  Davy Guillarme,et al.  Comparison of ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography for the analysis of pharmaceutical compounds. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[23]  E. Fukusaki,et al.  Development of a polar lipid profiling method by supercritical fluid chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 2011, Journal of separation science.

[24]  Timothy D Veenstra,et al.  Clinical and pharmaceutical applications of packed-column supercritical fluid chromatography. , 2008, Journal of separation science.

[25]  Davy Guillarme,et al.  Analysis of basic compounds by supercritical fluid chromatography: attempts to improve peak shape and maintain mass spectrometry compatibility. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[26]  T. Berger Characterization of a 2.6 μm Kinetex porous shell hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography column in supercritical fluid chromatography with a comparison to 3 μm totally porous silica. , 2011, Journal of chromatography. A.

[27]  Ben Bolanos,et al.  Preserving the chromatographic integrity of high-speed supercritical fluid chromatography separations using time-of-flight mass spectrometry. , 2003, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[28]  E. Fukusaki,et al.  Metabolic profiling of lipids by supercritical fluid chromatography/mass spectrometry. , 2012, Journal of chromatography. A.

[29]  J. Veuthey,et al.  Systematic comparison of sensitivity between hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and reversed phase liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[30]  E. Lesellier,et al.  Characterization of five chemistries and three particle sizes of stationary phases used in supercritical fluid chromatography. , 2013, Journal of chromatography. A.

[31]  T. Berger,et al.  Separation of Natural Food Pigments in Saponified and Un-Saponified Paprika Oleoresin by Ultra High Performance Supercritical Fluid Chromatography (UHPSFC) , 2013, Chromatographia.

[32]  T. Berger Packed Column SFC , 1995 .

[33]  C. Pierron,et al.  Determination of 10-chromatographonates in pharmaceutical formulations by high-performance liquid chromatography , 1990 .

[34]  T. Peart,et al.  Gas chromatographic and mass spectrometric determination of some resin and fatty acids in pulpmill effluents as their pentafluorobenzyl ester derivatives , 1990 .