Dimensionality of the Strategic Grid Framework: The Construct and Its Measurement

The recent dramatic impact of information technology (IT) on organizational performance has necessitated appropriate strategies for managing this organizational resource. IT im- pacts firms in different ways, and management needs a clear and systematic understanding of both the current and future relevance and impact of its IT before selecting management tools and approaches. The strategic grid framework, developed for the purpose of helping man- agement gain this understanding, is one of the most highly recognized and quoted conceptual frameworks in information systems literature. Despite such recognition, valid operational measures of this construct are not available for use in empirical research studies. The research reported in this paper is an attempt to develop and validate operational measures for the dimensions of the strategic grid, with the understanding that the availability of such measures will promote future empirical studies. Data for this study consist of the responses of 231 IS executives to a survey instrument. Operational models of the grid dimensions are specified and the measurement properties of the models are assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) within the LISREL framework. Measures resulting from the analysis are shown to meet the requirements of rigorous tests of measurement properties. The CFA results also show that the current portfolio dimension of the strategic grid is unidimensional, while the future port- folio dimension has three factors: management support, differentiation, and enhancement.

[1]  G. Premkumar An empirical study of IS planning characteristics among industries , 1992 .

[2]  K. Jöreskog Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests , 1971 .

[3]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Information management : the strategic dimension , 1988 .

[4]  James A. Senn,et al.  Information systems in management: 3rd ed , 1987 .

[5]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Multivariate Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1984 .

[6]  D. Lance Revenaugh,et al.  Business Process Re‐engineering: The Unavoidable Challenge , 1994 .

[7]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness , 1993 .

[8]  T. Raghunathan,et al.  Planning Implications of the Information Systems Strategic Grid: An Empirical Investigation , 1990 .

[9]  Niv Ahituv,et al.  Principles of information systems for management , 1982 .

[10]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Industry‐Level Impact of Information Technology: An Empirical Analysis of Three Industries* , 1995 .

[11]  Robert C. MacCallum,et al.  SPECIFICATION SEARCHES IN COVARIANCE STRUCTURE MODELING , 1986 .

[12]  James A. Senn Information Systems in Management , 1978 .

[13]  Vijay Sethi,et al.  Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage , 1994 .

[14]  VenkatramanN. Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises , 1989 .

[15]  M. Porter,et al.  How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage , 1985 .

[16]  Ralph H. Sprague,et al.  Information systems management in practice , 1985 .

[17]  Thomas L. Case,et al.  Management information systems: Strategy and action , 1989 .

[18]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate data analysis (4th ed.): with readings , 1995 .

[19]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Information Systems Concepts for Management , 1982 .

[20]  F. Warren McFarlan,et al.  Corporate information systems management : text and cases , 1988 .

[21]  C. Wiseman Strategic Information Systems: Trends and Challenges over the Next Decade. , 1988 .

[22]  R. Bagozzi An Examination Of The Validity Of Two Models Of Attitude. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[23]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  A Primer of LISREL , 1989 .

[24]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Management information systems : conceptual foundations, structure, and development , 1985 .

[25]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[26]  Yannis Bakos,et al.  Information Technology and Corporate Strategy: A Research Perspective , 2015, MIS Q..

[27]  Sanjay L. Ahire,et al.  Development and Validation of TQM Implementation Constructs , 1996 .

[28]  K. G. Jöreskog,et al.  Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests , 1971 .

[29]  Blake Ives,et al.  The information system as a competitive weapon , 1984, CACM.

[30]  B. Byrne A Primer of Lisrel: Basic Applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Models , 1989 .

[31]  T. S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  Research Report - Adaptation of a Planning System Success Model to Information Systems Planning , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[32]  H. Marsh,et al.  Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. , 1985 .

[33]  A. Farhoomand Review of "Corporate Information Systems Management: Text and Cases, Third Edition, by James I. Cash, Jr., F. W. McFarlan, James L. McKenney, and Lynda M. Applegate." Richard D. Irwin, Inc., 1992 , 1993, DATB.

[34]  Laurence Prusak,et al.  Managing Information Strategically , 1993 .

[35]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .