Subcellular pH and predicted pH‐dependent features of proteins

A characteristic of two‐dimensional proteomics gels is a general bimodal distribution of isoelectric (pI) values. Discussion of this feature has focussed on the balance of acidic and basic ionisable residues, and potential relationships between pI distributions and organism classification or protein subcellular location. Electrostatics calculations on a set of protein structures with known subcellular location show that predicted folded state pI are similar to those calculated from sequence alone, but adjusted according to a general stabilising effect from interactions between ionisable groups. Bimodal distributions dominate both pI and the predicted pH of maximal stability. However, there are significant differences between these features. The average pH of maximal stability generally follows organelle pH. Average pI values are well removed from organelle pH in most subcellular environments, consistent with the view that proteins have evolved to carry (on average) net charge in a given subcellular location, and relevant to discussion of solubility in crowded environments. Correlation of the predicted pH of maximum stability with subcellular pH suggests an evolutionary pressure to adjust folded state interactions according to environment. Finally, our analysis of ionisable group contributions to stability suggests that Golgi proteins have the largest such term, although this dataset is small.

[1]  K C Chou,et al.  Prediction of protein structural classes and subcellular locations. , 2000, Current protein & peptide science.

[2]  O. Seksek,et al.  Nuclear pH gradient in mammalian cells revealed by laser microspectrofluorimetry. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[3]  M. Gerstein,et al.  A Bayesian system integrating expression data with sequence patterns for localizing proteins: comprehensive application to the yeast genome. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  R. Ellis.  Macromolecular crowding : obvious but underappreciated , 2022 .

[5]  Guoli Wang,et al.  PISCES: a protein sequence culling server , 2003, Bioinform..

[6]  F. Neidhardt,et al.  Diagnosis of cellular states of microbial organisms using proteomics , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[7]  E. Alexov,et al.  Combining conformational flexibility and continuum electrostatics for calculating pK(a)s in proteins. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[8]  A. Fersht,et al.  Perturbed pKA-values in the denatured states of proteins. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Jinrang Kim,et al.  Are acidic and basic groups in buried proteins predicted to be ionized? , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Zhiyong Lu,et al.  Predicting subcellular localization of proteins using machine-learned classifiers , 2004, Bioinform..

[11]  L. Brocchieri.  Environmental signatures in proteome properties. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  M. Gilson,et al.  Prediction of pH-dependent properties of proteins. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  R. Schwartz,et al.  Whole proteome pI values correlate with subcellular localizations of proteins for organisms within the three domains of life. , 2001, Genome research.

[14]  M. Kanehisa,et al.  A knowledge base for predicting protein localization sites in eukaryotic cells , 1992, Genomics.

[15]  Burkhard Rost,et al.  LOC3D: annotate sub-cellular localization for protein structures , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  J. Warwicker,et al.  Simplified methods for pKa and acid pH‐dependent stability estimation in proteins: Removing dielectric and counterion boundaries , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[17]  M. Kanehisa,et al.  Expert system for predicting protein localization sites in gram‐negative bacteria , 1991, Proteins.

[18]  P. Beroza,et al.  Protonation of interacting residues in a protein by a Monte Carlo method: application to lysozyme and the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  S. White,et al.  Membrane protein folding and stability: physical principles. , 1999, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[20]  G von Heijne,et al.  Prediction of organellar targeting signals. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[21]  I. Humphery-Smith,et al.  ‘Proteomic contigs’ of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis (BCG) using novel immobilised pH gradients , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[22]  J. Visser,et al.  Intracellular pH homeostasis in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus niger. , 2002, European journal of biochemistry.

[23]  A. Elcock.  Realistic modeling of the denatured states of proteins allows accurate calculations of the pH dependence of protein stability. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  R. Vaughan-Jones,et al.  Modelling intracellular H(+) ion diffusion. , 2003, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[25]  Hanno Steen,et al.  Analysis of protein phosphorylation using mass spectrometry: deciphering the phosphoproteome. , 2002, Trends in biotechnology.

[26]  K. Wirtz,et al.  Peroxisomes in human fibroblasts have a basic pH , 1999, Nature Cell Biology.

[27]  L. Hood,et al.  Understanding the adaptation of Halobacterium species NRC-1 to its extreme environment through computational analysis of its genome sequence. , 2001, Genome research.

[28]  M. Karplus,et al.  pKa's of ionizable groups in proteins: atomic detail from a continuum electrostatic model. , 1990, Biochemistry.

[29]  A Miyawaki,et al.  Measurement of cytosolic, mitochondrial, and Golgi pH in single living cells with green fluorescent proteins. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Cathy H. Wu,et al.  The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  Jim Warwicker,et al.  Improved pKa calculations through flexibility based sampling of a water‐dominated interaction scheme , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[33]  Michael Grabe,et al.  Regulation of Organelle Acidity , 2001, The Journal of general physiology.

[34]  B. Rost,et al.  Adaptation of protein surfaces to subcellular location. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  S. Grinstein,et al.  The pH of the secretory pathway: measurement, determinants, and regulation. , 2004, Physiology.

[36]  Paul B Rainey,et al.  Global analysis of predicted proteomes: functional adaptation of physical properties. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Emil Alexov,et al.  Numerical calculations of the pH of maximal protein stability. The effect of the sequence composition and three-dimensional structure. , 2003, European journal of biochemistry.

[38]  Jean-Michel Claverie,et al.  Genomic Correlates of Hyperthermostability, an Update* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  O. Emanuelsson,et al.  Analysis of Curated and Predicted Plastid Subproteomes of Arabidopsis. Subcellular Compartmentalization Leads to Distinctive Proteome Properties1[w] , 2004, Plant Physiology.

[40]  G. Caraux,et al.  The modal distribution of protein isoelectric points reflects amino acid properties rather than sequence evolution , 2004, Proteomics.

[41]  K Watanabe,et al.  Archaeal adaptation to higher temperatures revealed by genomic sequence of Thermoplasma volcanium. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.