Counterpoint: bias from population stratification is not a major threat to the validity of conclusions from epidemiological studies of common polymorphisms and cancer.

In their Point, Thomas and Witte [(1)][1] forcefully lay out their case for seriously considering the impact of population stratification in so-called “association” studies of genetic factors and cancer. In our Counterpoint, we discuss the nature of population stratification; the conditions that

[1]  R. Millikan.  Re: Population stratification in epidemiologic studies of common genetic variants and cancer: quantification of bias. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  N. Risch.  Searching for genetic determinants in the new millennium , 2000, Nature.

[3]  G A Satten,et al.  Accounting for unmeasured population substructure in case-control studies of genetic association using a novel latent-class model. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[4]  N. Rothman,et al.  NAT2 slow acetylation and bladder cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 22 case-control studies conducted in the general population. , 2000, Pharmacogenetics.

[5]  K. Buetow,et al.  The use of common genetic polymorphisms to enhance the epidemiologic study of environmental carcinogens. , 2001, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[6]  S Wacholder,et al.  Parity, oral contraceptives, and the risk of ovarian cancer among carriers and noncarriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  B Langholz,et al.  Cohort studies for characterizing measured genes. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[8]  N Risch,et al.  The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases I. DNA pooling. , 1998, Genome research.

[9]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Replication validity of genetic association studies , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[10]  W. Browner,et al.  Are all significant P values created equal? The analogy between diagnostic tests and clinical research. , 1987, JAMA.

[11]  Debra T. Silverman,et al.  Selection of controls in case-control studies. II. Types of controls. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[12]  C B Begg,et al.  The search for cancer risk factors: when can we stop looking? , 2001, American journal of public health.

[13]  J. Kelsey,et al.  Use of race and ethnicity in epidemiologic research: concepts, methodological issues, and suggestions for research. , 2000, Epidemiologic reviews.

[14]  N Risch,et al.  The relative power of family-based and case-control designs for linkage disequilibrium studies of complex human diseases. II. Individual genotyping. , 1999, Genome research.

[15]  R. Williams,et al.  Gm3;5,13,14 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: an association in American Indians with genetic admixture. , 1988, American journal of human genetics.

[16]  N E Morton,et al.  Tests and estimates of allelic association in complex inheritance. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic dissection of complex traits science , 1994 .

[18]  S. Higuchi,et al.  Reliability of a flushing questionnaire and the ethanol patch test in screening for inactive aldehyde dehydrogenase-2 and alcohol-related cancer risk. , 1997, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[19]  D. Reich,et al.  Detecting association in a case‐control study while correcting for population stratification , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.

[20]  John S Witte,et al.  Point: population stratification: a problem for case-control studies of candidate-gene associations? , 2002, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[21]  J. Pritchard,et al.  Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  N. Risch.  The genetic epidemiology of cancer: interpreting family and twin studies and their implications for molecular genetic approaches. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[23]  N. Rothman,et al.  Case-control studies of common alleles and environmental factors. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[24]  K. Weiss,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium mapping of complex disease: fantasy or reality? , 1998, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[25]  J K McLaughlin,et al.  Selection of controls in case-control studies. I. Principles. , 1992, American journal of epidemiology.

[26]  N. Rothman,et al.  Population stratification in epidemiologic studies of common genetic variants and cancer: quantification of bias. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  J. Witte,et al.  Asymptotic bias and efficiency in case-control studies of candidate genes and gene-environment interactions: basic family designs. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[28]  K. Roeder,et al.  Genomic Control for Association Studies , 1999, Biometrics.