Knowledge-driven preferences in informal inbound open innovation modes. An explorative view on small to medium enterprises

Purpose This paper aims to investigate three key factors (i.e. cognitive dimensions, the knowledge-driven approach and absorptive capacity) that are likely to determine the preference for informal inbound open innovation (OI) modes, through the lens of the OI model and knowledge-based view (KBV). The innovation literature has differentiated these collaborations into informal inbound OI entry modes and formal inbound OI modes, offering an advocative and conceptual view. However, empirical studies on these collaborations are still limited. Design/methodology/approach Building on the above-mentioned theoretical framework, the empirical research was performed in two stages. First, data were collected via a closed-ended questionnaire distributed to all the participants from the sample by e-mail. Second, to assess the hypotheses, structural equation modelling (SEM) via IBM® SPSS® Amos 20 was applied. Findings The empirical research was conducted on 175 small to medium enterprises in the United Kingdom, suggesting that the knowledge-driven approach is the strongest determinant, leading to a preference for informal inbound OI modes. The findings were obtained using SEM and are discussed in line with the theoretical framework. Research limitations/implications Owing to the chosen context and sector of the empirical analysis, the research results may lack generalisability. Hence, new studies are proposed. Practical implications The paper includes implications for the development of informal inbound OI led by knowledge-driven approach. Originality/value This paper offers an empirical research to investigate knowledge-driven preferences in informal inbound OI modes.

[1]  Pedro López-Sáez,et al.  Directions of external knowledge search: investigating their different impact on firm performance in high-technology industries , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[3]  H. Keskin.  Market Orientation, Learning Orientation and Innovation Capabilities in SMEs: An extended Model , 2006 .

[4]  M. Nieto,et al.  Technological Collaboration: Bridging the Innovation Gap between Small and Large Firms** , 2010 .

[5]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Towards knowledge networking , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  A. Link,et al.  Dynamic entrepreneurship and technology-based innovation , 2016 .

[7]  Nieves L. Diaz-Diaz,et al.  The interaction between external and internal knowledge sources: an open innovation view , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Harry Matlay,et al.  SME financing in the UK and in China: a comparative perspective , 2006 .

[9]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  High-technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities , 1998 .

[10]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  New ICTs for Knowledge Management in Organizations , 2016, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  Veronica Scuotto,et al.  Innovation, Second Mover and Network System , 2012 .

[12]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Partnering strategies and performance of SMEs' international joint ventures , 2006 .

[13]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[14]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[16]  B. Tether.  Do Services Innovate (Differently)? Insights from the European Innobarometer Survey , 2005 .

[17]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[18]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[19]  R. Likert.  “Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes, A” , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Does Customer Interaction Enhance New Product Success , 2000 .

[21]  A. Hughes,et al.  Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledge , 2014 .

[22]  R. Grant,et al.  A Knowledge Accessing Theory of Strategic Alliances , 2004 .

[23]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[24]  Alberto Ferraris,et al.  How SMEs Engage in Open Innovation: a Survey , 2018 .

[25]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  Managerial practices and operative directions of knowledge management within inter-firm networks: a global view , 2014, J. Knowl. Manag..

[26]  Michela Gallo,et al.  Waste management in Smart Cities: the application of circular economy in Genoa (Italy) , 2014 .

[27]  Wim Vanhaverbeke,et al.  Theories of the firm and Open Innovation , 2014 .

[28]  A. Ferraris,et al.  Innovation-receiving subsidiaries and dual embeddedness: impact on business performance , 2016 .

[29]  Bernard L. Simonin.  Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances , 1999 .

[30]  H. Chesbrough.  Managing Open Innovation , 2004 .

[31]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  E-business, organizational innovation and firm performance in manufacturing SMEs: an empirical study in Spain , 2015 .

[32]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[33]  Joanne Roberts,et al.  University-Industry Collaboration: A CoPs Approach to KTPs , 2011, J. Knowl. Manag..

[34]  Carlo Salvato,et al.  Knowledge Internalization and Product Development in Family Firms: When Relational and Affective Factors Matter , 2014 .

[35]  T. Minshall,et al.  How do large multinational companies implement open innovation , 2011 .

[36]  Stefano Bresciani,et al.  Internet of Things: Applications and challenges in smart cities: a case study of IBM smart city projects , 2016, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[37]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  Use of ULS-SEM and PLS-SEM to Measure a Group Effect in a Regression Model Relating Two Blocks of Binary Variables , 2010 .

[38]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[39]  V. Parida,et al.  Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High‐Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance , 2012 .

[40]  F. Malerba.  Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and innovation systems : evidence from Europe , 2010 .

[41]  Gordon E. Greenley,et al.  THE PERFORMANCE IMPACT OF MARKETING RESOURCES , 2005 .

[42]  Pierpaolo Pontrandolfo,et al.  Different practices for open innovation: a context-based approach , 2013, J. Knowl. Manag..

[43]  B. Looy,et al.  Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach , 2005 .

[44]  Ralph Katz,et al.  Shifting Innovation to Users via Toolkits , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[45]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Relation‐specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: creating advantage through network relationships , 2006 .

[46]  R. Henson.  Understanding Internal Consistency Reliability Estimates: A Conceptual Primer on Coefficient Alpha , 2001 .

[47]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Outbound Open Innovation and its Effect on Firm Performance: Examining Environmental Influences , 2009 .

[48]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[49]  Dominik Walcher,et al.  Toolkits for Idea Competitions: A Novel Method to Integrate Users in New Product Development , 2006 .

[50]  Dirk Meissner,et al.  Building an Innovation-Driven Economy – The Case of BRIC and GCC Countries , 2014 .

[51]  Robert P. Garrett,et al.  Internal Corporate Venture Operations Independence and Performance: A Knowledge�?Based Perspective , 2015 .

[52]  Vito Albino,et al.  From Technological Inventions to New Products: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda of the Main Enabling Factors , 2015 .

[53]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Social web knowledge sharing and innovation performance in knowledge-intensive manufacturing SMEs , 2017 .

[54]  Elizabeth A. Smith.  The role of tacit and explicit knowledge in the workplace , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[55]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[56]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[57]  Tim Minshall,et al.  Beyond absorptive capacity in open innovation process: the relationships between openness, capacities and firm performance , 2016, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[58]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[59]  Jaehoon Rhee,et al.  Drivers of innovativeness and performance for innovative SMEs in South Korea: Mediation of learning orientation , 2010 .

[60]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  An investigation of the effect of electronic business on financial performance of Spanish manufacturing SMEs , 2016, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[61]  V. Chiesa,et al.  Organisational modes for Open Innovation in the bio-pharmaceutical industry: An exploratory analysis , 2011 .

[62]  O. Gassmann,et al.  The Future of Open Innovation , 2010 .

[63]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[64]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[65]  Dirk Meissner,et al.  “Keep open”: the potential of gatekeepers for the aligning universities to the new Knowledge Triangle , 2017 .

[66]  D. Meissner,et al.  Conceptualizing the innovation process towards the ‘active innovation paradigm’—trends and outlook , 2016 .

[67]  Sue Newell,et al.  Depth and breadth of external knowledge search and performance: The mediating role of absorptive capacity , 2015 .

[68]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[69]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[70]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[71]  Michael R. Mullen,et al.  Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit , 2008 .

[72]  J. Darroch,et al.  Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation , 2002 .

[73]  P. Landoni,et al.  Small and Medium Enterprises Collaborations with Knowledge Intensive Services: An Explorative Analysis of the Impact of Innovation Vouchers , 2016 .

[74]  S. Brunswicker,et al.  Open Innovation in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprises (SMEs): External Knowledge Sourcing Strategies and Internal Organizational Facilitators , 2015 .

[75]  U. Lichtenthaler,et al.  A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive Capacity , 2009 .

[76]  Maribel Guerrero,et al.  Technology entrepreneurship research opportunities: insights from across Europe , 2016, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[77]  Nina Rosenbusch,et al.  Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs , 2011 .

[78]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[79]  Jeannie L. Johnson,et al.  Inbound open innovation for enhanced performance: Enablers and opportunities , 2013 .

[80]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Making sense of corporate venture capital. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[81]  Pedro Soto-Acosta,et al.  Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs , 2017 .

[82]  D. Vrontis,et al.  Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms , 2017 .

[83]  B. N. Sánchez,et al.  Residual‐Based Diagnostics for Structural Equation Models , 2009, Biometrics.

[84]  Alexandra Waluszewski,et al.  The Development of a User Network as a Way to Re-launch an Unwanted Product , 2008 .

[85]  Spyros Lioukas,et al.  Radical Product Innovations in Smes: The Dominance of Entrepreneurial Orientation , 2003 .

[86]  Petra Andries,et al.  Small firm innovation performance and employee involvement , 2011 .

[87]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  The effect of social networking sites and absorptive capacity on SMES’ innovation performance , 2016, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[88]  David Tennenhouse,et al.  Intel's Open Collaborative Model of Industry-University Research , 2004 .

[89]  Jenny Darroch,et al.  Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[90]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  International diversification and firm performance: a four-stage model , 2016 .

[91]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[92]  Anthony W. Ulwick.  Turn customer input into innovation. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[93]  Stefano Bresciani,et al.  Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe , 2017 .

[94]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[95]  Gabriel Szulanski.  The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[96]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Effectiveness of technology investment: Impact of internal technological capability, networking and investment's strategic importance , 2012 .

[97]  Wenyu Dou,et al.  The effects of firm capabilities on external collaboration and performance: The moderating role of market turbulence , 2015 .

[98]  Manlio Del Giudice,et al.  Influences of cognitive dimensions on the collaborative entry mode choice of small and medium-sized enterprises , 2017 .

[99]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[100]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation , 2004 .

[101]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[102]  J. West,et al.  Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation , 2013 .