On the Assessment of Decision Quality: Considerations Regarding Utility, Conflict and Accountability
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Asch. Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments , 1951 .
[2] N. Miller,et al. Displacement: greater generalization of approach than avoidance in a generalized approach avoidance conflict. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.
[3] S. Asch. Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .
[4] J. O. Whittaker,et al. A Repetition of Asch's “Effects of Group Pressure upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgment” , 1957 .
[5] P. Wason. On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task , 1960 .
[6] A. D. Nicholl,et al. Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision , 1963 .
[7] P. Samuelson. Risk and uncertainty: a fallacy of large numbers , 1963 .
[8] P. Swingle,et al. The structure of conflict , 1970 .
[9] C. H. Coombs,et al. Mathematical psychology : an elementary introduction , 1970 .
[10] E. E. Jones,et al. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. , 1972 .
[11] Daniel Kahneman,et al. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .
[12] Herbert A. Simon,et al. The Structure of Ill Structured Problems , 1973, Artif. Intell..
[13] A. D. Jones,et al. Obedience to Authority , 1974 .
[14] A. Tversky,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.
[15] I. Janis,et al. Decision Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment , 1977 .
[16] R. Hogarth,et al. Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .
[17] R. L. Keeney,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.
[18] D. Winterfeldt. Structuring decision problems for decision analysis , 1980 .
[19] Lola L. Lopes. Decision Making in the Short Run. , 1981 .
[20] P. Schoemaker. The Expected Utility Model: Its Variants, Purposes, Evidence and Limitations , 1982 .
[21] N. Sahlin,et al. The role of second-order probabilities in decision making , 1983 .
[22] J. Christensen-Szalanski. Discount Functions and the Measurement of Patients' Values , 1984, Medical decision making.
[23] Charles Vlek,et al. WHAT CONSTITUTES A GOOD DECISION , 1984 .
[24] H. Arkes,et al. The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .
[25] H. J. Einhorn,et al. Accepting error to make less error. , 1986, Journal of personality assessment.
[26] Lola L. Lopes,et al. [Advances in Experimental Social Psychology] Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Volume 20 Volume 20 || Between Hope and Fear: The Psychology of Risk , 1987 .
[27] B. Fischhoff,et al. KNOWING WHAT YOU WANT: MEASURING LABILE VALUES , 1988 .
[28] William Samuelson,et al. Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .
[29] I. Levin,et al. How Consumers Are Affected by the Framing of Attribute Information Before and After Consuming the Product , 1988 .
[30] J. Baron,et al. Outcome bias in decision evaluation. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[31] J. Kagan,et al. Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .
[32] R. Dawes,et al. Heuristics and Biases: Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment , 2002 .
[33] J. Elster,et al. The Cement Of Society , 1989 .
[34] Raanan Lipshitz,et al. Either a medal or a corporal: the effects of success and failure on the evaluation of decision making and decision makers , 1989 .
[35] D. Kahneman,et al. Propensities and counterfactuals: The loser that almost won , 1990 .
[36] Jonathan Baron,et al. Behavioral Law and Economics: Reluctance to Vaccinate: Omission Bias and Ambiguity , 1990 .
[37] Gideon Keren,et al. Additional tests of utility theory under unique and repeated conditions , 1991 .
[38] J. Baron,et al. Omission and commission in judgment and choice , 1991 .
[39] Karen Zelan. Cognition and Communication , 1991 .
[40] G. Keren. Calibration and probability judgements: Conceptual and methodological issues , 1991 .
[41] Philip E. Tetlock,et al. An Alternative Metaphor in the Study of Judgment and Choice: People as Politicians , 1991 .
[42] B. Fischhoff,et al. Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? , 1991 .
[43] Jonathan Baron,et al. Judgment by outcomes: When is it justified? , 1992 .
[44] J. Baron,et al. Status-quo and omission biases , 1992 .
[45] G. Loewenstein,et al. Anomalies in Intertemporal Choice: Evidence and an Interpretation , 1992 .
[46] Donald A. Redelmeier,et al. On the Framing of Multiple Prospects , 1992 .
[47] Eldar Shafir,et al. Reason-based choice , 1993, Cognition.
[48] Steven K. Jones,et al. Assessing the Accuracy of Decisions , 1993 .
[49] F. B. Vernadat,et al. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .
[50] R. Clemen,et al. Beyond expected utility: rethinking behavioral decision research. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[51] E. Weber. From Subjective Probabilities to Decision Weights: The Effect of Asymmetric Loss Functions on the Evaluation of Uncertain Outcomes and Events , 1994 .
[52] S. Epstein,et al. Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[53] Raanan Lipshitz. Judgment by Outcomes: Why Is It Interesting? A Reply to Hershey and Baron: "Judgment by Outcomes: When Is It Justified?" , 1995 .
[54] Sean A. Spence,et al. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain , 1995 .
[55] N. Roese,et al. What Might Have Been: The Social Psychology of Counterfactual Thinking , 1995 .
[56] T. Gilovich,et al. The experience of regret: what, when, and why. , 1995, Psychological review.
[57] P. Slovic. The Construction of Preference , 1995 .
[58] Judgment by Outcomes: When Is It Warranted? , 1995 .
[59] Fischhoff,et al. The Real World : What Good Is It ? , 1996 .
[60] G. Keren. Perspectives of Behavioral Decision Making: Some Critical Notes , 1996 .
[61] S. Sloman. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .
[62] G. Loewenstein. Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior , 1996 .
[63] Steven K. Jones,et al. The Effect of Outcome Information on the Evaluation and Recall of Individuals' Own Decisions , 1997 .
[64] D. Kahneman,et al. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experience utility , 1997 .
[65] E. Higgins. Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as A Motivational Principle , 1998 .
[66] J. Elster. Emotions and Economic Theory , 1998 .
[67] Edna Ullmann-Margalit,et al. Second‐Order Decisions* , 1999, Ethics.
[68] P. Tetlock,et al. Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.
[69] E. Higgins. Making a good decision: value from fit. , 2000, The American psychologist.
[70] Gideon Keren,et al. Why isp = .90 better thanp = .70? Preference for definitive predictions by lay consumers of probability judgments , 2001 .
[71] J. Haidt. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. , 2001, Psychological review.
[72] K. Teigen,et al. Why is p = .90 better than p = .70? Preference for definitive predictions by lay consumers of probability judgements. , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[73] Christopher K. Hsee,et al. Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.
[74] Chris Snijders,et al. Do you trust? Whom do you trust? When do you trust? , 2001 .
[75] B. Fischhoff,et al. Hindsight ≠ foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty* , 2003 .
[76] H. Gaertner. The quest for optimality : A positive heuristic of science ? , 2004 .