The complementarity of internal integration and product modularity: An empirical study of their interaction effect on competitive capabilities

Modular product design and internal integration are commonly adopted by manufacturers to improve operational performance. A number of studies argue that the adoption of product modularity significantly alters organization design, which affects the impact of internal integration on competitive capabilities. This paper thus aims to empirically explore the individual effects as well as interaction effects of product modularity and internal integration on competitive capabilities. The competitive capabilities studied in this paper include product innovativeness, low price, product quality, delivery, flexibility and customer services. After analysing the data from 251 Hong Kong manufacturers through moderated multiple regression analysis, the study found that better internal integration can significantly improve product innovativeness, product quality, delivery, flexibility and customer services, while a high level of product modularity enhances product innovativeness, flexibility and customer services. More importantly, the study shows that internal integration and product modularity can interact to improve product innovativeness and product quality. These results enhance our understanding of the interaction of product design and organizational coordination.

[1]  R. M. Hall,et al.  A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage , 1993 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Modularity and Innovation in Complex Systems , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[3]  S. Kotha Mass customization: Implementing the emerging paradigm for competitive advantage , 1995 .

[4]  Erwin Danneels,et al.  Product innovativeness from the firm's perspective: Its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance , 2001 .

[5]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  The Quality Movement Organization Theory , 1999 .

[6]  J. Barney,et al.  Resource-Based Theory: Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 2007 .

[7]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[8]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Modularity, product variety, production volume and component sourcing: Theorizing beyond generic prescriptions , 2002 .

[9]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Correlation and causality , 1979 .

[10]  Dieter Ernst,et al.  Limits to Modularity: Reflections on Recent Developments in Chip Design , 2005 .

[11]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[12]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[13]  Juliana Hsuan Mikkola,et al.  Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[14]  M. Kotabe,et al.  Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automotive industries , 2003 .

[15]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Component Sharing in the Management of Product Variety: a Study of Automotive Braking Systems , 1999 .

[16]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Perceptual measures of performance: Fact or fiction? , 2004 .

[17]  O. Sorenson,et al.  Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data , 2001 .

[18]  Mohammad Z. Meybodi Using Principles of Just-in-Time to Improve New Product Development Process , 2003 .

[19]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[20]  Richard K. Lester,et al.  Made by Hong Kong , 1997 .

[21]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: evidence from Japanese and Korean firms , 2002 .

[22]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[23]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[24]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[25]  Don A. Dillman,et al.  Chapter 10 – Mail and Other Self-Administered Questionnaires1 , 1983 .

[26]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  An exploratory study of the nature of cumulative capabilities , 2004 .

[27]  M. Primo,et al.  An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes , 2002 .

[28]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Fundamentals of Product Modularity , 1994 .

[29]  Ricardo Ernst,et al.  Evaluation of supply chain structures through modularization and postponement , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  R. Sanchez Strategic flexibility in product competition , 1995 .

[31]  J. Barney Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage , 1996 .

[32]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[33]  S. Kotha Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition , 1992 .

[34]  K. Scott Swan,et al.  A Product and Process Model of the Technology-Sourcing Decision , 2003 .

[35]  J. R. Dixon,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies revisited , 2001 .

[36]  P. Cardona,et al.  Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry , 2002 .

[37]  Patricia J. Daugherty,et al.  Marketing/Logistics Integration and Firm Performance , 1999 .

[38]  John R. Baldwin,et al.  Innovation and Knowledge Creation in an Open Economy , 2003 .

[39]  Roger G. Schroeder,et al.  Generic manufacturing strategies and plant performance , 2004 .

[40]  Z. Kevin Weng,et al.  Risk-pooling over demand uncertainty in the presence of product modularity , 1999 .

[41]  S. Thomke,et al.  Agile Product Development: Managing Development Flexibility in Uncertain Environments , 1998 .

[42]  Morgan Swink,et al.  Core manufacturing capabilities and their links to product differentiation , 1998 .

[43]  Kenneth B. Kahn Market orientation, interdepartmental integration, and product development performance , 2001 .

[44]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Competing—and Learning—in Modular Markets , 2001 .

[45]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[46]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[47]  J. Barney,et al.  On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage , 1998 .

[48]  Antonio K. W. Lau,et al.  Supply chain product co-development, product modularity and product performance: Empirical evidence from Hong Kong manufacturers , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[49]  Preston G. Smith,et al.  Developing products in half the time: new rules, new tools 10 [Book Review] , 1997, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[50]  L. Phillips Assessing Measurement Error in Key Informant Reports: A Methodological Note on Organizational Analysis in Marketing , 1981 .

[51]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[52]  John T. Mentzer,et al.  Logistics and interdepartmental integration , 1996 .

[53]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  New Product Strategy in Small Technology-Based Firms: A Pilot Study , 2011 .

[54]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[55]  Charles H. Fine Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control In The Age Of Temporary Advantage , 1998 .

[56]  R. Garud,et al.  Technological and Organizational Designs for Realizing Economies of Substitution , 1997 .

[57]  N. Sundgren,et al.  Managerial issues in parts sharing among product development projects: a case study , 2002 .

[58]  Bou-Wen Lin Cooperating for supply chain effectiveness: manufacturing strategy for Chinese OEMs , 2003, Int. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag..

[59]  Michael Song,et al.  Marketing and technology resource complementarity : An analysis of their Interaction Effect in two environmental contexts , 2005 .

[60]  A. Griffin The Effect of Project and Process Characteristics on Product Development Cycle Time , 1997 .

[61]  J. D. Sherman,et al.  Environmental Uncertainty, Organizational Integration, and New Product Development Effectiveness: A Test of Contingency Theory , 1998 .

[62]  Barry A. Colbert,et al.  The Complex Resource-Based View: Implications for Theory and Practice in Strategic Human Resource Management , 2004 .

[63]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance , 2007 .

[64]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[65]  Elizabeth Fenner The secrets of his success. , 2004, Fortune.

[66]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation , 1992 .

[67]  Andrea Prencipe,et al.  The Business of Systems Integration , 2004 .

[68]  R. Grant,et al.  Environments: Organizational Capability as Knowledge Integration , 2022 .

[69]  Juliana H. Mikkola,et al.  Capturing the Degree of Modularity Embedded in Product Architectures , 2006 .

[70]  Charles F. Sabel,et al.  Neither Modularity nor Relational Contracting: Inter-Firm Collaboration in the New Economy , 2004, Enterprise & Society.

[71]  J. D. Sherman,et al.  Differential effects of the primary forms of cross functional integration on product development cycle time , 2000 .

[72]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Statistical power problems with moderated multiple regression in management research. , 1995 .

[73]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[74]  John K. Gershenson,et al.  Product modularity: Definitions and benefits , 2003 .

[75]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[76]  Frits K. Pil,et al.  Modularity: Implications for Imitation, Innovation, and Sustained Advantage , 2006 .

[77]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design , 1996 .

[78]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Configurations of Manufacturing Strategy, Business Strategy, Environment and Structure , 1996 .

[79]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[80]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  International Diversification: Effects on Innovation and Firm Performance in Product-Diversified Firms , 1997 .

[81]  Beverly B. Tyler The complementarity of cooperative and technological competencies: a resource-based perspective , 2001 .

[82]  R. Calantone,et al.  Are Really New Product Development Projects Harder to Shut Down , 1998 .

[83]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[84]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[85]  Raghu Garud,et al.  Managing in the Modular Age , 2002 .

[86]  Richard B. Chase,et al.  Operations Management , 2019, CCSP (ISC)2 Certified Cloud Security Professional Official Study Guide, 2nd Edition.

[87]  Esteban Fernández,et al.  Analysis of manufacturing strategy as an explanatory factor of competitiveness in the large Spanish industrial firm , 2001 .

[88]  Harry Boer,et al.  The International Manufacturing Strategy Survey , 2008 .

[89]  HA Henny Romijn,et al.  Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England , 2002 .

[90]  S. Brusoni,et al.  Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products and Organizations , 2001 .

[91]  Gianmario Verona A Resource-Based View of Product Development , 1999 .

[92]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships , 2003 .

[93]  James D. Wright,et al.  Handbook of Survey Research. , 1985 .

[94]  Óscar González-Benito,et al.  Cultural vs. operational market orientation and objective vs. subjective performance: Perspective of production and operations , 2005 .

[95]  A. Ledwith,et al.  Management of new product development in small electronics firms , 2000 .

[96]  Ron Sanchez,et al.  Modular Architectures in the Marketing Process , 1999 .

[97]  Dilip Chhajed,et al.  Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[98]  R. Parthasarthy,et al.  Product innovation input and outcome: moderating effects of the innovation process , 2002 .

[99]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Towards a Theory of Competitive Progression: Evidence from High‐Tech Manufacturing , 2004 .

[100]  Ieke le Blanc,et al.  Product Modularity and the Design of Closed-Loop Supply Chains , 2004 .

[101]  A. Carmeli,et al.  The relationships between intangible organizational elements and organizational performance , 2004 .

[102]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  Contingent Product Design and Marketing Strategies Influencing New Product Success and Failure in U.S. and Japanese Electronics Firms , 1997 .

[103]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  Factors influencing new product success and failure in small entrepreneurial high-technology electronics firms , 1994 .

[104]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Contingency Value of Complementary Capabilities in Product Development , 1999 .

[105]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[106]  R. Calantone,et al.  Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance , 2002 .

[107]  Jukka Nihtilä R&D–Production integration in the early phases of new product development projects , 1999 .

[108]  Rajesh Nellore,et al.  Factors influencing success in integrated product development (IPD) projects , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[109]  Melissa A. Schilling Toward a General Modular Systems Theory and Its Application to Interfirm Product Modularity , 2000 .

[110]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Re-exploring the Relationship Between Flexibility and the External Environment , 2004 .

[111]  Michael J. Stahl Perspectives in total quality , 1998 .

[112]  William L. Berry,et al.  Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation , 2000 .

[113]  S. Sanderson,et al.  Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman , 1995 .

[114]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[115]  T. Hill Operations management : strategic context and managerial analysis , 2000 .

[116]  K. Praveen Parboteeah,et al.  Creativity in innovative projects: How teamwork matters , 2007 .

[117]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Statistical Power with Moderated Multiple Regression in Management Research , 1995 .

[118]  Melissa A. Schilling,et al.  The Use of Modular Organizational Forms: An Industry-Level Analysis , 2001 .

[119]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[120]  A. Griffin PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT CYCLE TIME FOR BUSINESS-TO-BUSINESS PRODUCTS , 2002 .

[121]  Uday S. Karmarkar,et al.  Modular product design and product support , 1987 .

[122]  Gerard H. Gaynor,et al.  Handbook of Technology Management , 1996 .

[123]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Agile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectives , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[124]  M. Enright,et al.  The Hong Kong Advantage , 1997 .

[125]  K. Clark,et al.  Integration and Dynamic Capability: Evidence from Product Development in Automobiles and Mainframe Computers , 1994 .

[126]  Akira Takeishi,et al.  Bridging inter‐ and intra‐firm boundaries: management of supplier involvement in automobile product development , 2001 .

[127]  A. Weele,et al.  Purchasing and supply chain management : analysis, planning and practice , 2000 .

[128]  César Camisón-Zornoza,et al.  A Meta-analysis of Innovation and Organizational Size , 2004 .

[129]  George A. Marcoulides,et al.  Product development practices and performance: A structural equation modeling-based multi-group analysis , 2006 .

[130]  V. Krishnan,et al.  Technology Selection and Commitment in New Product Development: The Role of Uncertainty and Design Flexibility , 2002, Manag. Sci..