Guided search for triple conjunctions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Koen Lamberts,et al. The time course of categorization. , 1998 .
[2] Joseph Krummenacher,et al. Inter-trial and redundant-signals effects in visual search and discrimination tasks: Separable pre-attentive and post-selective effects , 2010, Vision Research.
[3] DeLiang Wang,et al. The role of priming in conjunctive visual search , 2002, Cognition.
[4] Marius Usher,et al. Competitive guided search: meeting the challenge of benchmark RT distributions. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[5] J. Wolfe,et al. Second-order parallel processing: visual search for the odd item in a subset. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[6] H. Müller,et al. Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.
[7] Hanna Benoni,et al. Diluting the burden of load: Perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects , 2010 .
[8] P. McLeod,et al. Motion coherence and conjunction search: Implications for guided search theory , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[9] J. T. Mordkoff,et al. Feature integration without visual attention: Evidence from the correlated flankers task , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[10] James T. Townsend,et al. A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .
[11] G W Humphreys,et al. Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.
[12] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.
[13] J. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[14] A. Treisman,et al. Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[15] Ken Nakayama,et al. Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.
[16] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[17] J. Duncan,et al. Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.
[18] M. Eckstein. The Lower Visual Search Efficiency for Conjunctions Is Due to Noise and not Serial Attentional Processing , 1998 .
[19] S. Yantis,et al. Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[20] Alexander B. Bilsky,et al. Parallel processing of park-whole information in visual search tasks , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[21] F. edridge-green. Tests for Colour-Blindness , 1895, Nature.
[22] H. Egeth,et al. Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[23] S Ullman,et al. Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. , 1987, Science.
[24] S. Dehaene. Discriminability and dimensionality effects invisual search for featural conjunctions: A functional pop-out , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[25] Takatsune Kumada,et al. A conjunctive feature similarity effect for visual search , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[26] S. Yantis,et al. Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[27] H. Nothdurft. Saliency effects across dimensions in visual search , 1993, Vision Research.
[28] J. Townsend,et al. The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[29] Hermann J Müller,et al. Dimensional weighting in cross-dimensional singleton conjunction search. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[30] M. Carrasco,et al. The temporal dynamics of visual search: evidence for parallel processing in feature and conjunction searches. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[31] Denis Cousineau,et al. Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .
[32] F. W. Edridge-Green,et al. Test for Colour Blindness , 1895 .
[33] P. McLeod,et al. Filtering by movement in visual search. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[34] Alan Kingstone,et al. Influence of inter-item symmetry in visual search. , 2004, Spatial vision.
[35] Richard D. Morey,et al. Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .
[36] Yuanzhen Li,et al. Measuring visual clutter. , 2007, Journal of vision.
[37] Y. Tsal,et al. Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.
[38] G. Humphreys,et al. Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .
[39] Nilli Lavie,et al. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010). , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[40] Frank E. Ritter,et al. The Rise of Cognitive Architectures , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.
[41] C. Eriksen,et al. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .
[42] Charles Curtis Eriksen,et al. The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays , 1973 .
[43] J. Wolfe,et al. What Can 1 Million Trials Tell Us About Visual Search? , 1998 .
[44] Denis Cousineau,et al. Error bars in within-subject designs: a comment on Baguley (2012) , 2014, Behavior research methods.
[45] J. Wolfe,et al. Limitations on the Parallel Guidance of Visual Search : Color x Color and Orientation x Orientation Conjuctions , 2004 .
[46] V. Lollo. The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[47] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[48] Søren Kyllingsbæk,et al. Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: A computational approach , 2011, Neuropsychologia.
[49] K. Nakayama,et al. Stimulus discriminability in visual search , 1994, Vision Research.
[50] Melina A. Kunar,et al. Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[51] J. Palmer. Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .
[52] Andreas Bartels,et al. Coding and binding of color and form in visual cortex. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[53] H. Pashler,et al. Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.
[54] Ralph Weidner,et al. Dimensional weighting of primary and secondary target-defining dimensions in visual search for singleton conjunction targets , 2009, Psychological research.
[55] J M Wolfe,et al. Part—whole information is useful in visual search for size × size but not orientation × orientation conjunctions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[56] Melina A. Kunar,et al. Time to guide: Evidence for delayed attentional guidance in contextual cueing , 2008, Visual cognition.
[57] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[58] Joseph Krummenacher,et al. Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: parallel-coactive processing of dimensions is location specific. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[59] M. Proulx. Bottom-up guidance in visual search for conjunctions. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[60] A Found,et al. Parallel coding of conjunctions in visual search , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.
[61] Vincent Di Lollo. The feature-binding problem is an ill-posed problem. , 2012, Trends in cognitive sciences.
[62] M. R. Houck,et al. Conjunction of color and form without attention: evidence from an orientation-contingent color aftereffect. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[63] Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al. The binding problem lives on: comment on Di Lollo , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[64] J. T. Mordkoff,et al. Dividing attention between color and shape revisited: redundant targets coactivate only when parts of the same perceptual object , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[65] G W Humphreys,et al. Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[66] Jeff Miller,et al. Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.
[67] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.
[68] C. McCollough. Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1965, Science.
[69] J. Wolfe,et al. Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.
[70] Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers articles in press , 1992 .
[71] D E Williams,et al. Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.