Exploring Theta Burst Stimulation as an intervention to improve motor recovery in chronic stroke

OBJECTIVE To explore the effects of a single session of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, given as Theta Burst Stimulation, on behavioural and physiological measures of hand function in chronic stroke patients. METHODS Six chronic stroke patients with incomplete recovery of the hand were tested under three conditions: excitatory TBS over the stroke hemisphere (iTBS(SH)), inhibitory TBS (cTBS(IH)) over the intact hemisphere and sham stimulation. Behavioural outcomes included simple and choice reaction time paradigms. Physiological effects were assessed using single pulse TMS on both sides. Changes were sought for up to 40min after TBS. RESULTS Immediately after iTBS(SH) simple reaction times in the paretic hands were decreased and, compared to sham stimulation, remained significantly shorter throughout the testing period. The amplitude of the MEPs at rest and during background contraction and the area under the Input-Output curves were also increased on the stroke side after iTBS(SH). cTBS(IH) suppressed the MEPs evoked in the healthy hands but did not change motor behaviour or the electrophysiology of the paretic hands. No side effects were encountered. CONCLUSIONS TBS seems safe in chronic stroke patients. iTBS over the stroke hemisphere transiently improved motor behaviour and corticospinal output in the paretic hands. SIGNIFICANCE Excitatory TBS may represent a useful rTMS protocol to apply to the stroke hemisphere in future longer term therapy trials.

[1]  Jing Z. Liu,et al.  Human brain activation during sustained and intermittent submaximal fatigue muscle contractions: an FMRI study. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Y. Z. Huang,et al.  Theta‐burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation suppresses specific excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Charles Capaday,et al.  Neurophysiological methods for studies of the motor system in freely moving human subjects , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  M. Bilodeau,et al.  Changes in upper limb joint torque patterns and EMG signals with fatigue following a stroke , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[5]  Steven D. Freedman,et al.  A Sham-Controlled Trial of a 5-Day Course of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Unaffected Hemisphere in Stroke Patients , 2006, Stroke.

[6]  D. Gravel,et al.  Maximal grip force in chronic stroke subjects and its relationship to global upper extremity function , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[7]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. , 2004, Postgraduate medical journal.

[8]  E. Bézard,et al.  Cortical stimulation and epileptic seizure: a study of the potential risk in primates. , 1999, Neurosurgery.

[9]  Jacquie Kurland,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Complementary Treatment for Aphasia , 2004, Seminars in speech and language.

[10]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Techniques and mechanisms of action of transcranial stimulation of the human motor cortex , 1997, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[12]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke , 2005, Neurology.

[13]  E. Roth,et al.  Multivariate analysis of improvement and outcome following stroke rehabilitation. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[14]  D. Wade,et al.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. , 1990, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[16]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neurology.

[17]  M. Ridding,et al.  Does induction of plastic change in motor cortex improve leg function after stroke? , 2003, Neurology.

[18]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Scanning patients with tasks they can perform , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[20]  M. Hallett,et al.  Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Pharmacological Modulation of Cortical Excitability Shifts Induced by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Humans , 2003, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Ichiro Watanabe,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex Improves Hand Function After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[23]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Motor Cortex Stimulation for the Enhancement of Recovery from Stroke: A Prospective, Multicenter Safety Study , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[24]  M. Hallett,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation–Induced Corticomotor Excitability and Associated Motor Skill Acquisition in Chronic Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[25]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  J. Marler,et al.  Underlying structure of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale: results of a factor analysis. NINDS tPA Stroke Trial Investigators. , 1999, Stroke.

[27]  Measuring TMS Stimulus/Response Characteristics From Both Hemispheres Simultaneously for Proximal and Distal Upper Limb Muscles , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[28]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[29]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Arm function after stroke: Neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  S. Olney,et al.  Muscle strengthening and physical conditioning to reduce impairment and disability in chronic stroke survivors. , 1999, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  Christian Gerloff,et al.  The Role of Multiple Contralesional Motor Areas for Complex Hand Movements after Internal Capsular Lesion , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  H. Sackeim,et al.  Sham TMS: intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentials , 2001, Biological Psychiatry.

[33]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Direct Demonstration That Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Can Enhance Corticospinal Excitability in Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[34]  A. Thiel,et al.  Role of the Contralateral Inferior Frontal Gyrus in Recovery of Language Function in Poststroke Aphasia: A Combined Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Positron Emission Tomography Study , 2005, Stroke.