Imaging of unresolved objects, superresolution, and precision of distance measurement with video microscopy.

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the utility of video microscopy to visualize, resolve, and measure widths and distances to precisions that are conventionally considered to be below the limit of the resolution of the light microscope. In an image-forming system, resolution is generally expressed as a measure of the ability to separate the images of two neighboring object points. In the case of a light microscope, producing diffraction-limited images, the resolution limit is defined as the minimum distance between two self-luminous or incoherently illuminated objects or structures whose diffraction images can visually be distinguished as coming from two points. When the diffraction images of the two points overlap to an extent that they can no longer be distinguished from that of an individual object, the two are said not to be resolved or that the distance is less than the limit of resolution. For microscopy, the contrast boosting ability of video allows the use of the best corrected objective lenses not only for bright field and fluorescence but also for polarized light and differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy.

[1]  James A. Spudich,et al.  Myosin subfragment-1 is sufficient to move actin filaments in vitro , 1987, Nature.

[2]  C. M. Sparrow On Spectroscopic Resolving Power , 1916 .

[3]  M. Françon,et al.  Progress in Microscopy , 1962 .

[4]  D. F. Evans,et al.  Video enhanced differential interference contrast microscopy: a new tool for the study of association colloids and prebiotic assemblies , 1984 .

[5]  H. H. Hopkins,et al.  The Influence of the Condenser on Microscopic Resolution , 1950 .

[6]  D. Weiss,et al.  Gliding movement of and bidirectional transport along single native microtubules from squid axoplasm: evidence for an active role of microtubules in cytoplasmic transport , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[7]  J. L. Harris,et al.  Diffraction and Resolving Power , 1964 .

[8]  Harold Osterberg,et al.  Diffraction Images of Circular Self-Radiant Disks , 1961 .

[9]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Tracking kinesin-driven movements with nanometre-scale precision , 1988, Nature.

[10]  S. S. Ballard,et al.  Atlas of Optical Phenomena , 1963 .

[11]  C. Koester,et al.  Optimum Half-Shade Angle in Polarizing Instruments , 1959 .

[12]  Emil Wolf,et al.  Principles of Optics: Contents , 1999 .

[13]  E. Salmon,et al.  Microtubule dynamics in the chromosomal spindle fiber: analysis by fluorescence and high-resolution polarization microscopy. , 1988, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[14]  S Inoué,et al.  Video microscopy of living cells and dynamic molecular assemblies. , 1987, Applied optics.

[15]  C W McCutchen,et al.  Superresolution in microscopy and the Abbe resolution limit. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[16]  Colin J. R. Sheppard,et al.  Information capacity and resolution in an optical system , 1986 .

[17]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Single microtubules from squid axoplasm support bidirectional movement of organelles , 1985, Cell.

[18]  E. H. Linfoot,et al.  Diffraction Images in Systems with an Annular Aperture , 1953 .

[19]  S Inoué,et al.  Acrosomal reaction of Thyone sperm. II. The kinetics and possible mechanism of acrosomal process elongation , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[20]  M. Koonce,et al.  Reactivation of organelle movements along the cytoskeletal framework of a giant freshwater ameba , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  G. J. Brakenhoff,et al.  Confocal scanning light microscopy with high aperture immersion lenses , 1979 .

[22]  K. Castleman,et al.  Spatial and photometric resolution and calibration requirements for cell image analysis instruments. , 1987, Applied optics.

[23]  Luther W. Smith Diffraction Images of Disk-Shaped Particles Computed for Full Köhler Illumination , 1960 .

[24]  G. D. Francia Resolving Power and Information , 1955 .

[25]  M. Fordham,et al.  An evaluation of confocal versus conventional imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[26]  L Ellis,et al.  Nerve growth cones isolated from fetal rat brain. IV. Preparation of a membrane subfraction and identification of a membrane glycoprotein expressed on sprouting neurons , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.

[27]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Direct observation of motion of single F-actin filaments in the presence of myosin , 1984, Nature.

[28]  S Kamimura,et al.  Direct measurement of nanometric displacement under an optical microscope. , 1987, Applied optics.

[29]  R D Allen,et al.  Video-enhanced contrast polarization (AVEC-POL) microscopy: a new method applied to the detection of birefringence in the motile reticulopodial network of Allogromia laticollaris. , 1981, Cell motility.

[30]  R D Allen,et al.  Video-enhanced contrast, differential interference contrast (AVEC-DIC) microscopy: a new method capable of analyzing microtubule-related motility in the reticulopodial network of Allogromia laticollaris. , 1981, Cell motility.

[31]  S Inoué,et al.  Video image processing greatly enhances contrast, quality, and speed in polarization-based microscopy , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  Light Microscopy‐A Modern Renaissance a , 1986, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.