The Andes Physics Tutoring System: An Experiment in Freedom

The Andes physics tutoring system is an experiment in student freedom. It allows students to solve a physics problem in virtually any legal way. This means that Andes must recognize an extremely large number of possible steps occurring in an extraordinarily large number of possible orders. Such freedom raises several research questions. (1) How can Andes solve the technical challenge of understanding student’s behavior in such a wide-open context? (2) How can Andes give pedagogically useful help and guidance? In particular, how can it guide students who are floundering without curtailing the freedom of students who are not floundering? (3) Will Andes be effective in getting students in real classrooms to learn physics? (4) What does it take to scale up Andes and disseminate it widely? The Andes project, which began in the mid 1990’s, has achieved workable solutions to the first three goals: Andes can understand student behavior; It provides pedagogical help similar to that of human experts; Most importantly, Andes causes large, reliable learning gains compared to control classes taught with convention, paper-based instruction. This chapter summarizes the first three results and discusses our progress on the fourth goal, scale-up.

[1]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  Andes: A Coached Problem Solving Environment for Physics , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[2]  L. R Gleitman,et al.  Proceedings of the twenty-second annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2000 .

[3]  D. Norman Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[4]  J. Gregory Trafton,et al.  Effective Tutoring Techniques: A Comparison of Human Tutors and Intelligent Tutoring Systems , 1992 .

[5]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Limitations of Student Control: Do Students Know When They Need Help? , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[6]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  An Intelligent SQL Tutor on the Web , 2003, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[7]  B. Bloom The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[8]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Behavior of Tutoring Systems , 2006, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[9]  Mao Yibin,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring System for Symbolic Calculation , 1992, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[10]  Johanna D. Moore,et al.  Using Natural Language Processing to Analyze Tutorial Dialogue Corpora Across Domains Modalities , 2009, AIED.

[11]  Joel A. Michael,et al.  Hinting as a Tactic in One-on-One Tutoring , 1996 .

[12]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  Adapting to When Students Game an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2006, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[13]  Jean-François Nicaud,et al.  Towards a product for teaching formal algebra , 1998 .

[14]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[15]  Thomas Bay,et al.  Gaming the system , 2011 .

[16]  Cristina Conati,et al.  Procedural Help in Andes: Generating Hints Using a Bayesian Network Student Model , 1998, AAAI/IAAI.

[17]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  An Evaluation of a Hybrid Language Understanding Approach for Robust Selection of Tutoring Goals , 2002, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[18]  D. Kane,et al.  A Computer-based Course in Classical Mechanics. , 1980 .

[19]  Mark K. Singley The Reification of Goal Structures in a Calculus Tutor: Effects on Problem-Solving Performance , 1990, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[20]  Joel A. Shapiro Algebra Subsystem for an Intelligent Tutoring System , 2002 .

[21]  Antonija Mitrovic,et al.  Evaluation of a Constraint-Based Tutor for a Database Language , 1999 .

[22]  Joel A. Shapiro An Algebra Subsystem for Diagnosing Students' Input in a Physics Tutoring System , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[23]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Educational Software Features that Encourage and Discourage "Gaming the System" , 2009, AIED.

[24]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Conceptual Helper: An Intelligent Tutoring System for Teaching Fundamental Physics Concepts , 2000, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[25]  Paul Brna,et al.  The Application of Cognitive Diagnosis to the Quantitative Analysis of Simple Electrical Circuits , 1992, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[26]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Lessons Learned , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..